← Back

CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

Wylie Pirates

Enrollment: 3,288 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#103

was #85

Record

4-2

1-2 district

Elo

1571

#103 of 249

OVR Grade

77.7

#103 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

82.7

#55 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

74.2

#130 of 249 in 6A

Perf

1752

#85 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@Richardson Pearce (0-6) 1004	60% (+4)	W 41-23	1418	+4.8	+8.0	+0.07	—
2	@Richardson Lake Highlands (4-2) 1695	17% (-15)	W 41-26	2032	+15.7	−5.5	+0.43	—
3	Mesquite Horn (0-6) 1116	77% (+11)	W 56-28	1625	+1.8	−3.2	+0.10	—
4	Garland Sachse (6-0) 1785	42% (-3)	L 42-44	1830	+18.7	+5.5	—	−0.62
5	@Garland Lakeview Centennial (2-4) 1348	67% (+7)	W 53-22	2106	+22.7	−1.6	+0.16	—
7	Wylie East (4-2) 1720	59% (+4)	L 27-42	1502	+2.1	+2.1	—	−0.74
8	@Garland (2-4) 1176	84% (+16)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	North Garland (1-5) 760	97% (+32)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	Garland Rowlett (3-3) 1384	69% (+7)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	@South Garland (2-4) 442	> 98% (+45)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		69	Garland Sachse (3) Mustangs	80.9 1785	6-0	3-0	43.7	19.5	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		81	Wylie East (4) Raiders	79.9 1720	4-2	3-0	44.8	22.2	6.1-0.9	> 98%	D2
3		103	Wylie (1) Pirates	77.7 1571	4-2	1-2	43.3	30.8	4.5-2.5	95.7%	D1
4		146	Garland Rowlett (7) Eagles	74.8 1384	3-3	2-1	31.8	26.2	4.2-2.9	89.4%	D2
5		155	Garland Lakeview Centennial (6) Patriots	74.3 1348	2-4	1-2	25.3	28.0	3.2-3.8	9.6%	—
6		181	Garland (5) Owls	71.7 1176	2-4	1-2	17.7	36.8	2.5-4.5	6.1%	—
7		229	North Garland (2) Raiders	65.4 760	1-5	1-2	12.7	42.8	1.2-5.8	< 2%	—
8		245	South Garland (8) Titans	60.6 442	2-4	0-3	15.0	42.0	0.1-6.9	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Wylie’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2008

13-3

Rating 747 (97th)

#2 · 2017

3-7

Rating 586 (74th)

#3 · 2009

3-7

Rating 578 (71st)

#4 · 2007

5-6

Rating 577 (71st)

#5 · 2016

5-6

Rating 576 (70th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1185	28.6	27.4	+1.2	1177	−4.2	+8.4	−12.6	1186	−4.57	+0.32	−4.89	453(29th)
2024	6-5	1491	29.5	26.3	+3.2	1398	−0.9	+0.8	−1.7	1456	−2.66	+0.34	−2.99	517(51st)
2023	6-5	1331	24.4	29.5	−5.2	1383	−7.5	+2.3	−9.7	1257	−2.84	+0.46	−3.30	480(36th)
2022	8-4	1754	22.6	17.9	+4.7	1469	−6.1	−9.3	+3.2	1579	−0.87	+1.32	−2.19	567(68th)
2021	3-7	1144	22.3	29.1	−6.8	1320	−11.1	+2.4	−13.5	1162	−5.46	+0.20	−5.67	439(24th)
2020	3-6	1263	20.8	35.7	−14.9	1561	−6.6	+4.8	−11.5	1214	−3.97	+0.56	−4.53	452(28th)
2019	6-5	1470	22.2	21.6	+0.5	1491	−6.8	−6.6	−0.3	1493	−2.82	+1.11	−3.93	514(49th)
2018	6-6	1603	28.3	29.1	−0.8	1407	+0.7	+4.0	−3.3	1418	−3.11	+1.06	−4.17	527(54th)
2017	3-7	1695	30.7	29.5	+1.2	1792	+7.4	−5.7	+13.1	1827	−2.79	+0.73	−3.51	586(74th)
2016	5-6	1736	28.1	29.6	−1.5	1776	+4.0	−5.2	+9.2	1731	−1.45	+0.97	−2.42	576(70th)
2015	1-1	1517	37.0	30.0	+7.0	1321	+2.1	−1.3	+3.4	1585	−0.70	+0.04	−0.74	—
2014	1-1	1578	37.0	23.5	+13.5	1408	+0.3	−7.1	+7.4	1684	−0.33	+0.03	−0.36	—
2013	0-1	1594	52.0	56.0	−4.0	2013	+24.3	+12.5	+11.8	1796	−0.55	0.00	−0.55	—
2012	0-1	1634	36.0	44.0	−8.0	1818	+8.5	+4.5	+4.0	1601	−0.66	0.00	−0.66	—
2011	1-1	1727	23.0	28.5	−5.5	1786	−2.1	−8.1	+5.9	1649	−0.58	+0.28	−0.86	—
2010	1-0	1922	36.0	17.0	+19.0	1802	+14.2	−14.2	+28.4	2210	+0.51	+0.51	0.00	—
2009	3-7	1818	27.2	30.5	−3.3	1764	+3.2	−3.9	+7.2	1679	−2.34	+1.01	−3.35	578(71st)
2008	13-3	2348	35.8	19.7	+16.1	1908	+14.9	−15.3	+30.2	2255	+5.62	+5.88	−0.26	747(97th)
2007	5-6	1688	28.2	27.1	+1.1	1741	+5.6	−4.6	+10.2	1755	−1.24	+1.33	−2.57	577(71st)
2006	3-7	1442	23.1	31.2	−8.1	1687	+2.0	+2.3	−0.4	1490	−3.03	+0.67	−3.70	518(51st)
2005	0-1	1429	24.0	42.0	−18.0	1834	+5.4	+8.4	−3.1	1423	−0.73	0.00	−0.73	—
2004	1-0	1507	39.0	0.0	+39.0	1499	+15.1	−21.4	+36.5	2412	+0.20	+0.20	0.00	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.