← Back
CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

Wylie East Raiders

Enrollment: 2,832 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#82
was #82
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1679
#82 of 249
OVR Grade
79.3
#82 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Richardson (0-0) 1563
62% (+5)
2
@Texarkana Texas High
43% (-3)
3
Royse City (0-0) 1686
49% (0)
4
@North Garland (0-0) 1096
92% (+23)
5
Garland (0-0) 1259
85% (+17)
7
@Wylie (0-0) 1328
81% (+14)
8
Garland Rowlett (0-0) 1534
65% (+6)
9
@South Garland (0-0) 506
> 98% (+47)
10
Garland Sachse (0-0) 1529
65% (+6)
11 67% (+7)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 82
Raiders
79.3
1679
0-0 0-0 5.5-1.5 94.9% D1
2 102
Eagles
77.1
1534
0-0 0-0 4.7-2.3 83.1% D2
3 103
Mustangs
77
1529
0-0 0-0 4.7-2.3 82% D1
4 112
Patriots
76.8
1510
0-0 0-0 4.5-2.5 78.5% D2
5 162
Pirates
74
1328
0-0 0-0 3.4-3.6 34.4%
6 172
Owls
73
1259
0-0 0-0 3-4 22.4%
7 197
Raiders
70.5
1096
0-0 0-0 2-5 4.7%
8 246
Titans
61.6
506
0-0 0-0 0.2-6.8 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Wylie East’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2024
10-2
Rating 651 (88th)
#2 · 2023
10-2
Rating 647 (87th)
#3 · 2025
10-1
Rating 577 (71st)
#4 · 2022
9-2
Rating 569 (68th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 10-1 1846 34.7 17.7 +17.0 1205 +2.2 −3.5 +5.7 1642 +0.47 +0.86 −0.38 577(71st)
2024 10-2 2070 42.2 17.1 +25.2 1400 +12.0 −9.2 +21.2 2030 +1.07 +1.57 −0.51 651(88th)
2023 10-2 1849 41.2 13.2 +28.1 1378 +10.0 −12.1 +22.2 2054 +0.28 +1.03 −0.75 647(87th)
2022 9-2 1604 35.3 16.5 +18.7 1321 +3.2 −7.0 +10.2 1754 −0.32 +1.16 −1.48 569(68th)
2021 1-0 1417 29.0 28.0 +1.0 1181 +0.1 +6.2 −6.1 1348 +0.04 +0.04 0.00
2020 1-0 1403 42.0 18.0 +24.0 1070 +5.8 +2.1 +3.7 1592 +0.02 +0.02 0.00
2017 0-1 1355 10.0 34.0 −24.0 1698 −13.4 −0.1 −13.4 1166 −0.71 0.00 −0.71
2016 1-0 1408 24.0 21.0 +3.0 1643 −0.8 −13.6 +12.8 1820 +0.41 +0.41 0.00
2015 0-1 1290 20.0 43.0 −23.0 2293 +5.3 +0.5 +4.8 1620 −0.38 0.00 −0.38
2014 0-1 1290 26.0 36.0 −10.0 1723 +0.5 +5.4 −4.9 1377 −0.38 0.00 −0.38
2013 0-1 1286 10.0 37.0 −27.0 2040 −7.3 −1.5 −5.9 1353 −0.58 0.00 −0.58
2012 1-0 1301 34.0 31.0 +3.0 1731 +12.5 +2.2 +10.3 1757 +0.26 +0.26 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.