← Back
CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

Weslaco Panthers

Enrollment: 2,764 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#115
was #115
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1499
#115 of 249
OVR Grade
76.6
#115 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Weslaco East
 97% (+33) — — — —
2
@McAllen Memorial
 74% (+10) — — — —
3
Mission Veterans Memorial
 83% (+15) — — — —
4
PSJA North (0-0) 1658
 34% (-6) — — — —
5
@PSJA (0-0) 938
 91% (+22) — — — —
7
@Edinburg Vela (0-0) 1516
 48% (-1) — — — —
8
@Edinburg Economedes (0-0) 1220
 76% (+11) — — — —
9
Edinburg North (0-0) 663
 97% (+33) — — — —
10
@La Joya (0-0) 933
 91% (+23) — — — —
11
Edinburg (0-0) 1029
 88% (+19) — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 109
Sabercats
76.9
1516
0-0 0-0 — — 4.1-0.9 > 98% D2
2 115
Panthers
76.6
1499
0-0 0-0 — — 4-1 > 98% D1
3 178
Jaguars
72.4
1220
0-0 0-0 — — 2.8-2.2 90.8% D1
4 203
Bobcats
69.5
1029
0-0 0-0 — — 2-3 68.4% D2
5 216
Coyotes
68
933
0-0 0-0 — — 1.6-3.5 36% —
6 240
Cougars
64
663
0-0 0-0 — — 0.6-4.4 6.2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Weslaco’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018
11-2
Rating 617 (82nd)
#2 · 2019
10-3
Rating 572 (70th)
#3 · 2023
11-1
Rating 566 (67th)
#4 · 2015
9-3
Rating 560 (65th)
#5 · 2025
9-3
Rating 560 (65th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 9-3 1570 32.9 16.4 +16.5 1211 −0.8 −4.9 +4.1 1603 −1.46 +0.52 −1.99 560(65th)
2024 8-4 1435 31.3 22.2 +9.2 1060 −1.8 +5.6 −7.3 1316 −2.79 +0.47 −3.26 504(46th)
2023 11-1 1618 32.2 13.2 +18.9 1105 −2.1 −5.9 +3.8 1595 +0.45 +1.25 −0.80 566(67th)
2022 8-4 1400 22.8 20.5 +2.3 1329 −6.4 −2.5 −3.9 1403 −1.97 +0.70 −2.67 498(43rd)
2021 5-4 1389 26.6 20.9 +5.7 1262 −2.9 +0.2 −3.1 1423 −2.40 +0.40 −2.80 496(43rd)
2020 3-2 1782 30.8 23.0 +7.8 1278 −0.3 +1.2 −1.5 1463 −0.79 +0.14 −0.94 —
2019 10-3 1886 36.1 25.2 +10.8 1321 +6.0 +1.9 +4.1 1602 −0.33 +1.54 −1.87 572(70th)
2018 11-2 1876 35.4 14.3 +21.1 1386 +6.9 −9.0 +15.8 1896 +1.18 +1.55 −0.37 617(82nd)
2017 3-5 1227 24.0 29.5 −5.5 1367 −4.1 +5.7 −9.8 1255 −3.06 +0.04 −3.10 460(31st)
2016 5-5 1321 17.6 16.5 +1.1 1319 −12.7 −5.7 −6.9 1327 −3.12 +0.15 −3.28 485(38th)
2015 9-3 1604 35.5 19.8 +15.8 1281 +3.7 −3.0 +6.7 1667 −1.40 +0.85 −2.26 560(65th)
2014 7-5 1466 26.0 17.9 +8.1 1242 −4.5 −2.8 −1.7 1457 −3.47 +0.78 −4.25 512(49th)
2013 7-4 1286 26.9 22.5 +4.5 1243 −4.8 +2.6 −7.4 1315 −2.88 +0.67 −3.55 476(35th)
2012 7-5 1340 22.0 20.9 +1.1 1331 −7.4 −2.7 −4.7 1383 −3.35 +0.91 −4.25 494(42nd)
2011 10-2 1487 33.2 14.9 +18.3 1062 −3.7 −3.1 −0.6 1485 −1.03 +0.48 −1.50 540(59th)
2010 9-2 1418 42.7 18.5 +24.3 929 +4.2 +4.0 +0.2 1504 −1.48 +0.31 −1.79 522(53rd)
2009 2-8 731 23.9 35.5 −11.6 970 −15.3 +17.2 −32.5 687 −7.31 +0.02 −7.33 344(6th)
2008 7-4 1333 36.6 25.1 +11.5 984 −0.1 +7.9 −8.1 1298 −3.04 +0.32 −3.37 481(37th)
2007 10-3 1491 45.4 29.5 +15.9 1111 +10.9 +10.7 +0.2 1506 −1.38 +0.61 −1.99 532(56th)
2006 9-3 1376 41.4 25.3 +16.1 1029 +4.8 +7.9 −3.1 1422 −1.85 +0.36 −2.21 503(46th)
2005 7-4 947 30.6 21.6 +9.0 938 −4.2 +9.2 −13.4 1165 −3.56 +0.20 −3.76 432(22nd)
2004 2-8 593 19.6 30.5 −10.9 906 −20.5 +16.3 −36.7 581 −7.75 +0.04 −7.79 323(5th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.