← Back
CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

Weslaco Panthers

Enrollment: 2,764 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#142
was #136
Record
3-3
0-1 district
Elo
1417
#142 of 249
OVR Grade
75.3
#142 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
75.3
#120 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
76.6
#106 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1558
#112 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Weslaco East
 97% (+33) W 30-0 1390 −15.2 −10.8 +0.01 —
2
@McAllen Memorial
 74% (+10) W 55-7 2343 +19.9 −13.9 +0.08 —
3
Mission Veterans Memorial
 87% (+18) L 24-26 1252 −8.0 +2.0 — −0.96
4
PSJA North (5-1) 1798
 29% (-9) L 24-35 1719 +2.2 −6.5 — −0.65
5
@PSJA (2-4) 934
 88% (+19) W 31-28 1063 −1.5 +16.0 +0.02 —
7
@Edinburg Vela (5-1) 1690
 29% (-9) L 33-37 1582 +5.4 +2.1 — −0.69
8
@Edinburg Economedes (2-4) 1062
 82% (+14) — — — — — —
9
Edinburg North (0-6) 447
 > 98% (+39) — — — — — —
10
@La Joya (3-3) 963
 87% (+18) — — — — — —
11
Edinburg (4-2) 874
 91% (+22) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 87
Sabercats
79.5
1690
 5-1 1-0 36.8 27.3 4.8-0.1 > 98% D2
2 142
Panthers
75.3
1417
 3-3 0-1 32.8 22.2 3.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 199
Jaguars
70
1062
 2-4 1-0 23.2 33.3 2.8-2.2 97.2% D1
4 208
Coyotes
68.5
963
 3-3 1-0 36.8 35.7 2.2-2.8 76.7% D2
5 216
Bobcats
67.2
874
 4-2 0-1 27.2 19.8 1.4-3.6 26.5% —
6 244
Cougars
60.7
447
 0-6 0-1 13.5 47.5 0.2-4.8 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Weslaco’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018
11-2
Rating 617 (82nd)
#2 · 2019
10-3
Rating 572 (70th)
#3 · 2023
11-1
Rating 566 (67th)
#4 · 2015
9-3
Rating 560 (65th)
#5 · 2025
9-3
Rating 560 (65th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 9-3 1570 32.9 16.4 +16.5 1211 −0.8 −4.9 +4.1 1603 −1.46 +0.52 −1.99 560(65th)
2024 8-4 1435 31.3 22.2 +9.2 1060 −1.8 +5.6 −7.3 1316 −2.79 +0.47 −3.26 504(46th)
2023 11-1 1618 32.2 13.2 +18.9 1105 −2.1 −5.9 +3.8 1595 +0.45 +1.25 −0.80 566(67th)
2022 8-4 1400 22.8 20.5 +2.3 1329 −6.4 −2.5 −3.9 1403 −1.97 +0.70 −2.67 498(43rd)
2021 5-4 1389 26.6 20.9 +5.7 1262 −2.9 +0.2 −3.1 1423 −2.40 +0.40 −2.80 496(43rd)
2020 3-2 1782 30.8 23.0 +7.8 1278 −0.3 +1.2 −1.5 1463 −0.79 +0.14 −0.94 —
2019 10-3 1886 36.1 25.2 +10.8 1321 +6.0 +1.9 +4.1 1602 −0.33 +1.54 −1.87 572(70th)
2018 11-2 1876 35.4 14.3 +21.1 1386 +6.9 −9.0 +15.8 1896 +1.18 +1.55 −0.37 617(82nd)
2017 3-5 1227 24.0 29.5 −5.5 1367 −4.1 +5.7 −9.8 1255 −3.06 +0.04 −3.10 460(31st)
2016 5-5 1321 17.6 16.5 +1.1 1319 −12.7 −5.7 −6.9 1327 −3.12 +0.15 −3.28 485(38th)
2015 9-3 1604 35.5 19.8 +15.8 1281 +3.7 −3.0 +6.7 1667 −1.40 +0.85 −2.26 560(65th)
2014 7-5 1466 26.0 17.9 +8.1 1242 −4.5 −2.8 −1.7 1457 −3.47 +0.78 −4.25 512(49th)
2013 7-4 1286 26.9 22.5 +4.5 1243 −4.8 +2.6 −7.4 1315 −2.88 +0.67 −3.55 476(35th)
2012 7-5 1340 22.0 20.9 +1.1 1331 −7.4 −2.7 −4.7 1383 −3.35 +0.91 −4.25 494(42nd)
2011 10-2 1487 33.2 14.9 +18.3 1062 −3.7 −3.1 −0.6 1485 −1.03 +0.48 −1.50 540(59th)
2010 9-2 1418 42.7 18.5 +24.3 929 +4.2 +4.0 +0.2 1504 −1.48 +0.31 −1.79 522(53rd)
2009 2-8 731 23.9 35.5 −11.6 970 −15.3 +17.2 −32.5 687 −7.31 +0.02 −7.33 344(6th)
2008 7-4 1333 36.6 25.1 +11.5 984 −0.1 +7.9 −8.1 1298 −3.04 +0.32 −3.37 481(37th)
2007 10-3 1491 45.4 29.5 +15.9 1111 +10.9 +10.7 +0.2 1506 −1.38 +0.61 −1.99 532(56th)
2006 9-3 1376 41.4 25.3 +16.1 1029 +4.8 +7.9 −3.1 1422 −1.85 +0.36 −2.21 503(46th)
2005 7-4 947 30.6 21.6 +9.0 938 −4.2 +9.2 −13.4 1165 −3.56 +0.20 −3.76 432(22nd)
2004 2-8 593 19.6 30.5 −10.9 906 −20.5 +16.3 −36.7 581 −7.75 +0.04 −7.79 323(5th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.