← Back
CLASS 6A · District 13-6A

The Woodlands College Park Cavaliers

Enrollment: 3,192 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#36
was #37
Record
3-3
2-1 district
Elo
2049
#36 of 249
OVR Grade
84.9
#36 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
85.4
#36 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
82
#58 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2076
#42 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Iowa Colony
 50% (0) W 38-10 2619 +18.4 −26.4 +0.78 —
2
Cy-Fair (4-2) 1782
 89% (+20) L 45-53 1700 +20.5 +12.5 — −0.57
3
#6Sheldon CE King (6-1) 2580
 21% (-13) L 7-58 1514 +0.0 −0.5 — −0.09
5
@#40Willis (4-2) 2033
 27% (-10) W 63-21 3053 +44.3 −17.8 +0.86 —
6
#17The Woodlands (5-1) 2314
 75% (+11) L 7-39 1630 −5.8 −11.0 — −0.35
7
@Cleveland (2-4) 465
 > 98% (+63) W 56-0 1937 +11.1 −6.4 +0.00 —
8
Conroe (3-3) 1530
 90% (+21) — — — — — —
9
@Conroe Grand Oaks (4-2) 1841
 70% (+8) — — — — — —
10
Conroe Oak Ridge (1-5) 1070
 > 98% (+39) — — — — — —
11
Conroe Caney Creek (2-4) 744
 > 98% (+52) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 13-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 17
Highlanders
88.9
2314
 5-1 3-0 47.3 17.2 6.8-0.2 > 98% D1
2 36
Cavaliers
84.9
2049
 3-3 2-1 36.0 30.2 5.6-1.4 97.5% D2
3 40
Wildkats
84.6
2033
 4-2 1-2 29.0 28.8 4.9-2.1 96.1% D2
4 62
Grizzlies
81.8
1841
 4-2 2-1 30.2 30.3 4.4-2.6 > 98% D1
5 116
Tigers
77.1
1530
 3-3 2-1 35.5 32.5 3.2-3.8 7.9% —
6 230
Panthers
65.2
744
 2-4 1-2 20.8 33.5 1.2-5.8 < 2% —
7 198
War Eagles
70.1
1070
 1-5 1-2 23.0 30.3 1.8-5.2 < 2% —
8 242
Indians
61
465
 2-4 0-3 16.5 33.7 0-7 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how The Woodlands College Park’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2025
12-1
Rating 708 (95th)
#2 · 2007
9-2
Rating 592 (76th)
#3 · 2021
8-4
Rating 582 (73rd)
#4 · 2024
7-5
Rating 571 (69th)
#5 · 2020
7-2
Rating 568 (68th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 12-1 2244 49.8 15.8 +34.1 1496 +20.3 −11.7 +32.1 2302 +3.70 +3.75 −0.05 708(95th)
2024 7-5 1662 36.1 29.0 +7.1 1528 +5.7 −0.9 +6.5 1663 −0.65 +1.30 −1.95 571(69th)
2023 4-6 1427 33.4 36.7 −3.3 1567 +3.5 +5.4 −1.8 1454 −2.67 +0.35 −3.01 515(50th)
2022 3-7 1330 20.0 28.8 −8.8 1610 −7.5 −3.8 −3.7 1407 −3.40 +0.28 −3.68 492(41st)
2021 8-4 1698 30.8 19.8 +10.9 1491 +3.0 −8.4 +11.3 1783 −1.36 +1.06 −2.42 582(73rd)
2020 7-2 1797 24.8 19.4 +5.3 1549 −1.2 −9.9 +8.6 1716 +0.86 +1.25 −0.39 568(68th)
2019 5-5 1465 22.2 21.8 +0.4 1515 −4.1 −6.6 +2.5 1562 −1.60 +0.65 −2.25 522(53rd)
2018 6-4 1368 24.7 20.9 +3.8 1522 −3.4 −8.3 +4.9 1623 −0.92 +0.51 −1.43 522(53rd)
2017 1-8 938 9.3 35.4 −26.1 1745 −14.0 +2.4 −16.5 1088 −4.21 +0.22 −4.43 415(18th)
2016 1-9 1102 17.7 40.3 −22.6 1740 −6.8 +6.2 −13.1 1173 −5.33 +0.09 −5.42 440(25th)
2015 3-8 1315 12.9 24.4 −11.5 1723 −7.2 −6.7 −0.5 1488 −3.60 +0.50 −4.10 500(44th)
2014 3-8 1397 19.4 27.6 −8.3 1706 −2.1 −3.8 +1.7 1542 −3.54 +0.29 −3.83 515(50th)
2013 5-5 1400 20.6 22.5 −1.9 1480 −7.1 −5.5 −1.6 1460 −2.35 +0.34 −2.68 505(46th)
2012 3-6 1195 23.9 27.8 −3.9 1504 −6.2 −1.3 −4.9 1378 −3.67 +0.14 −3.81 476(35th)
2011 5-5 1589 29.4 27.3 +2.1 1711 +5.2 −3.7 +8.9 1724 −1.54 +0.65 −2.19 560(65th)
2010 3-7 1357 18.8 26.4 −7.6 1544 −8.4 −2.3 −6.0 1349 −4.21 +0.30 −4.51 490(40th)
2009 4-6 1353 25.2 23.9 +1.3 1602 +0.6 −4.0 +4.6 1615 −2.53 +0.21 −2.74 523(53rd)
2008 4-5 1426 24.3 29.8 −5.4 1557 +0.9 +1.8 −0.9 1478 −2.52 +0.68 −3.20 513(49th)
2007 9-2 1757 30.9 16.6 +14.3 1437 +4.3 −7.5 +11.8 1795 +0.87 +1.38 −0.51 592(76th)
2006 5-5 1344 23.3 26.9 −3.6 1505 −0.7 +3.1 −3.8 1405 −2.04 +0.63 −2.68 498(43rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.