← Back

CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Strake Jesuit Crusaders

Enrollment: 2,974 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2

Rank

#88

was #88

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1623

#88 of 249

OVR Grade

78.5

#88 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	#36Cy Falls (0-0) 1963	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
2	@#5Humble Summer Creek (0-0) 2589	< 2% (-39)	—	—	—	—
3	@Spring Dekaney (0-0) 1361	75% (+10)	—	—	—	—
4	@#19Fort Bend Ridge Point (0-0) 2225	7% (-24)	—	—	—	—
5	Fort Bend Hightower (0-0) 1756	36% (-5)	—	—	—	—
6	Fort Bend Clements (0-0) 718	98% (+36)	—	—	—	—
7	@Fort Bend Austin (0-0) 901	95% (+29)	—	—	—	—
9	Fort Bend Elkins (0-0) 1292	80% (+13)	—	—	—	—
10	@Fort Bend Bush (0-0) 1433	69% (+8)	—	—	—	—
11	Fort Bend Travis (0-0) 1526	60% (+4)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		19	Fort Bend Ridge Point (4) Panthers	87.5 2225	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		65	Fort Bend Hightower (8) Hurricanes	80.5 1756	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.1-1.9	94%	D2
3		88	Strake Jesuit (2) Crusaders	78.5 1623	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-2.5	82.5%	D1
4		105	Fort Bend Travis (1) Tigers	77 1526	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	67.2%	D1
5		138	Fort Bend Bush (7) Broncos	75.6 1433	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	41%	—
6		168	Fort Bend Elkins (3) Knights	73.5 1292	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	14.9%	—
7		221	Fort Bend Austin (5) Bulldogs	67.6 901	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.1-5.9	< 2%	—
8		237	Fort Bend Clements (6) Rangers	64.8 718	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Strake Jesuit’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018

10-2

Rating 653 (88th)

#2 · 2019

10-3

Rating 626 (84th)

#3 · 2025

10-3

Rating 601 (78th)

#4 · 2017

8-3

Rating 600 (77th)

#5 · 2008

9-2

Rating 590 (75th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	10-3	1884	37.5	26.8	+10.8	1435	+8.1	−1.3	+9.5	1736	+0.52	+1.57	−1.05	601(78th)
2024	9-4	1737	34.5	26.2	+8.4	1419	+5.3	−0.5	+5.7	1643	−0.71	+1.07	−1.79	575(70th)
2023	3-8	1231	20.1	33.7	−13.6	1441	−6.2	+7.7	−13.8	1154	−5.28	+0.14	−5.42	456(30th)
2022	4-6	1414	35.8	36.8	−1.0	1469	+8.2	+10.6	−2.5	1439	−3.32	+0.72	−4.04	504(46th)
2021	4-6	1633	32.4	25.5	+6.9	1661	+7.9	−4.2	+12.1	1803	−2.07	+0.30	−2.37	569(68th)
2020	4-6	1645	24.1	23.5	+0.6	1718	+2.1	−7.8	+9.9	1747	−2.20	+0.35	−2.55	557(64th)
2019	10-3	2040	34.3	21.5	+12.8	1562	+7.4	−7.4	+14.9	1871	+1.25	+2.36	−1.10	626(84th)
2018	10-2	1950	45.1	22.5	+22.6	1595	+18.3	−6.8	+25.1	2126	+1.59	+2.20	−0.61	653(88th)
2017	8-3	1808	25.7	16.8	+8.9	1564	+1.3	−10.5	+11.8	1796	+0.53	+0.96	−0.43	600(77th)
2016	5-5	1502	20.3	20.5	−0.2	1475	−7.9	−6.8	−1.1	1473	−2.41	+0.35	−2.77	515(50th)
2015	8-5	1667	32.6	36.5	−3.8	1566	+6.5	+6.3	+0.2	1506	−0.63	+1.38	−2.01	544(60th)
2014	3-7	1128	24.4	36.7	−12.3	1510	−2.9	+9.6	−12.5	1188	−3.80	+0.07	−3.87	443(26th)
2013	1-9	1025	22.2	40.2	−18.0	1640	−0.1	+11.5	−11.7	1208	−5.30	+0.01	−5.32	438(24th)
2012	2-7	1269	14.6	38.2	−23.7	1747	−9.7	+2.1	−11.9	1203	−2.97	+0.09	−3.06	463(31st)
2011	3-7	1304	20.5	32.2	−11.7	1643	−2.3	+3.7	−6.0	1350	−3.24	+0.16	−3.40	484(38th)
2010	3-7	1275	25.0	30.9	−5.9	1610	−2.5	−0.4	−2.1	1447	−3.38	+0.09	−3.47	496(43rd)
2009	5-5	1403	27.1	26.5	+0.6	1291	−3.6	+4.4	−8.0	1299	−3.35	+0.49	−3.84	486(39th)
2008	9-2	1759	27.8	14.4	+13.5	1344	+1.1	−5.7	+6.7	1669	−0.15	+1.18	−1.33	590(75th)
2007	8-3	1762	30.1	25.7	+4.4	1595	+5.3	−3.3	+8.6	1714	+0.81	+1.71	−0.90	577(71st)
2006	4-6	1528	23.2	30.4	−7.2	1595	0.0	+1.3	−1.3	1467	−3.57	+0.55	−4.12	522(53rd)
2005	9-2	1651	28.3	14.5	+13.7	1403	+0.9	−7.4	+8.3	1706	+0.07	+1.42	−1.35	580(72nd)
2004	4-6	1418	18.1	18.7	−0.6	1504	−4.8	−5.0	+0.2	1504	−3.52	+0.77	−4.30	521(52nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.