← Back

CLASS 6A · District 14-6A

Spring Lions

Enrollment: 2,369 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#211

was #211

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

955

#211 of 249

OVR Grade

68.4

#211 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Channelview (0-0) 1063	39% (-4)	—	—	—	—
2	@#41Waller (0-0) 1938	< 2% (-39)	—	—	—	—
3	Cy Lakes (0-0) 1481	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
5	@Spring Dekaney (0-0) 1361	15% (-16)	—	—	—	—
6	#45Spring Westfield (0-0) 1914	< 2% (-38)	—	—	—	—
7	@Aldine Eisenhower (0-0) 1248	23% (-12)	—	—	—	—
8	@Aldine MacArthur (0-0) 724	72% (+9)	—	—	—	—
9	Aldine Nimitz (0-0) 1474	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
10	@Aldine Davis (0-0) 1416	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
11	Aldine (0-0) 253	95% (+28)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 14-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		45	Spring Westfield (8) Mustangs	82.9 1914	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D2
2		126	Aldine Nimitz (3) Cougars	76.2 1474	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-2.1	89.7%	D1
3		142	Aldine Davis (2) Falcons	75.3 1416	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	84%	D1
4		154	Spring Dekaney (7) Wildcats	74.5 1361	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.3-2.7	75%	D2
5		175	Aldine Eisenhower (5) Eagles	72.8 1248	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	44.8%	—
6		211	Spring (6) Lions	68.4 955	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	6%	—
7		236	Aldine MacArthur (1) Generals	64.9 724	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.4-5.6	< 2%	—
8		249	Aldine (4) Mustangs	57.8 253	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Spring’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021

11-2

Rating 704 (94th)

#2 · 2014

10-4

Rating 701 (94th)

#3 · 2015

11-2

Rating 682 (92nd)

#4 · 2020

9-1

Rating 676 (91st)

#5 · 2017

8-2

Rating 638 (86th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	1014	9.0	32.2	−23.2	1432	−18.8	+8.0	−26.9	829	−5.47	+0.01	−5.48	390(13th)
2024	5-6	1536	22.6	28.6	−6.0	1472	−3.3	+1.1	−4.4	1391	−2.58	+0.63	−3.21	512(49th)
2023	5-6	1358	30.8	28.2	+2.6	1490	+2.5	+1.1	+1.4	1535	−2.56	+0.22	−2.78	519(52nd)
2022	4-6	1408	27.0	25.4	+1.6	1483	−3.0	−2.0	−1.0	1475	−3.34	+0.34	−3.69	508(47th)
2021	11-2	2289	46.5	17.3	+29.2	1569	+18.7	−13.7	+32.4	2311	+3.30	+3.40	−0.10	704(94th)
2020	9-1	2123	39.3	15.1	+24.2	1589	+14.9	−12.5	+27.4	2185	+3.10	+3.21	−0.10	676(91st)
2019	8-3	1671	34.9	21.0	+13.9	1437	+6.3	−4.4	+10.7	1768	−0.26	+0.85	−1.11	569(68th)
2018	5-6	1555	35.1	27.9	+7.2	1416	+4.1	+1.4	+2.7	1566	−3.62	+0.46	−4.08	532(56th)
2017	8-2	1932	29.0	9.3	+19.7	1404	+2.9	−14.7	+17.6	1940	+0.34	+1.08	−0.73	638(86th)
2016	9-3	1942	31.3	17.6	+13.8	1523	+4.8	−8.7	+13.6	1839	+0.79	+1.59	−0.79	615(81st)
2015	11-2	2247	31.7	15.4	+16.3	1716	+10.0	−15.5	+25.5	2137	+3.40	+3.65	−0.26	682(92nd)
2014	10-4	2217	32.4	20.1	+12.2	1830	+12.8	−14.3	+27.2	2179	+3.33	+4.31	−0.98	701(94th)
2013	2-8	1404	21.3	33.6	−12.3	1851	+0.2	−0.7	+0.9	1523	−3.29	+0.99	−4.28	526(54th)
2012	3-7	1644	39.7	41.0	−1.3	1807	+14.7	+3.8	+10.9	1773	−2.87	+0.95	−3.82	578(71st)
2011	4-5	1630	26.4	33.4	−7.0	1784	+4.3	−0.4	+4.7	1617	−1.29	+1.27	−2.56	555(64th)
2010	2-8	1200	25.7	37.4	−11.7	1637	+1.9	+8.0	−6.1	1346	−4.26	+0.24	−4.50	475(35th)
2009	2-8	1299	28.3	37.6	−9.3	1694	+5.7	+7.2	−1.4	1464	−5.29	+0.38	−5.66	499(44th)
2008	4-5	1574	21.1	20.1	+1.0	1620	−1.6	−6.6	+4.9	1623	−1.76	+1.55	−3.31	546(61st)
2007	5-5	1602	21.8	23.6	−1.8	1761	+3.2	−4.9	+8.2	1704	−0.31	+1.31	−1.62	565(67th)
2006	3-7	1437	20.9	30.3	−9.4	1755	+0.6	+1.4	−0.8	1479	−3.23	+0.46	−3.69	519(52nd)
2005	4-4	1585	31.0	26.6	+4.4	1437	+5.8	+4.3	+1.5	1537	−2.42	+0.46	−2.88	539(58th)
2004	8-3	1634	32.0	21.0	+11.0	1575	+9.1	−5.9	+14.9	1873	+0.33	+2.01	−1.69	589(75th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.