| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston Heights (2-4) 1367 |
84% (+16) | W 16-10 | 1556 | −10.5 | −12.7 | +0.20 | — |
| 2 | @Richmond Randle |
18% (-15) | L 0-3 | 2240 | −11.7 | −41.3 | — | −0.13 |
| 3 | #40Willis (4-2) 2033 |
19% (-14) | L 7-12 | 1878 | −11.7 | −26.8 | — | −0.15 |
| 5 | Aldine Eisenhower (3-3) 1292 |
92% (+23) | W 47-0 | 2352 | +17.9 | −16.2 | +0.10 | — |
| 6 | @Spring (2-4) 1061 |
98% (+36) | W 42-6 | 2006 | +7.0 | −13.3 | +0.03 | — |
| 7 | Aldine Nimitz (3-3) 1518 |
82% (+15) | W 37-6 | 2151 | +8.6 | −17.4 | +0.23 | — |
| 8 | @Aldine Davis (5-1) 1655 |
78% (+12) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Aldine (0-6) 143 |
> 98% (+72) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Spring Dekaney (3-3) 1327 |
93% (+25) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Aldine MacArthur (4-2) 943 |
> 98% (+41) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#49
was #52
Record
4-2
3-0 district
Elo
1956
#49 of 249
OVR Grade
83.5
#49 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
74.9
#124 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
93.1
#9 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2030
#49 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 14-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Spring Westfield’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2005
11-1
Rating 751 (97th)
#2 · 2017
11-1
Rating 744 (97th)
#3 · 2006
13-1
Rating 741 (97th)
#4 · 2021
12-1
Rating 739 (97th)
#5 · 2022
12-2
Rating 739 (97th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.