← Back
CLASS 6A · District 14-6A

Spring Dekaney Wildcats

Enrollment: 2,345 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7
Rank
#154
was #154
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1361
#154 of 249
OVR Grade
74.5
#154 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@#39Fulshear (0-0) 1944
8% (-23)
2
Alief Elsik (0-0) 1019
81% (+14)
3
Strake Jesuit (0-0) 1623
25% (-10)
5
Spring (0-0) 955
85% (+16)
6
@Aldine Nimitz (0-0) 1474
38% (-5)
7
@Aldine Davis (0-0) 1416
44% (-2)
8
Aldine (0-0) 253
> 98% (+44)
9 93% (+25)
10
@#45Spring Westfield (0-0) 1914
9% (-22)
11
@Aldine Eisenhower (0-0) 1248
62% (+5)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 14-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 45
Mustangs
82.9
1914
0-0 0-0 6.6-0.4 > 98% D2
2 126
Cougars
76.2
1474
0-0 0-0 4.9-2.1 89.7% D1
3 142
Falcons
75.3
1416
0-0 0-0 4.6-2.4 84% D1
4 154
Wildcats
74.5
1361
0-0 0-0 4.3-2.7 75% D2
5 175
Eagles
72.8
1248
0-0 0-0 3.7-3.3 44.8%
6 211
Lions
68.4
955
0-0 0-0 2.3-4.7 6%
7 236
Generals
64.9
724
0-0 0-0 1.4-5.6 < 2%
8 249
Mustangs
57.8
253
0-0 0-0 0.2-6.8 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Spring Dekaney’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2011
14-2
Rating 766 (98th)
#2 · 2012
6-4
Rating 628 (84th)
#3 · 2010
6-4
Rating 611 (80th)
#4 · 2014
5-5
Rating 603 (78th)
#5 · 2015
5-5
Rating 596 (76th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 3-7 1226 18.6 32.2 −13.6 1401 −10.1 +7.6 −17.7 1057 −4.45 +0.05 −4.50 440(24th)
2024 4-6 1505 27.5 23.1 +4.4 1413 0.0 −0.5 +0.5 1512 −3.78 +0.20 −3.98 525(54th)
2023 8-3 1804 33.0 17.2 +15.8 1291 +2.1 −7.0 +9.0 1726 −0.65 +0.89 −1.54 589(75th)
2022 9-4 1845 35.8 24.8 +11.0 1423 +6.4 −2.3 +8.7 1718 −0.03 +1.72 −1.75 591(75th)
2021 5-6 1401 24.0 33.6 −9.6 1507 −3.8 +4.4 −8.1 1297 −2.82 +0.17 −3.00 480(37th)
2020 6-4 1629 37.7 20.9 +16.8 1412 +8.8 −4.6 +13.4 1835 −1.33 +0.27 −1.61 574(70th)
2019 6-5 1595 33.6 20.8 +12.8 1451 +5.6 −5.4 +11.1 1777 −1.61 +0.50 −2.11 562(66th)
2018 5-5 1485 23.3 22.1 +1.2 1434 −5.1 −3.2 −1.9 1453 −2.42 +0.55 −2.97 510(48th)
2017 6-4 1701 23.6 15.2 +8.4 1575 +0.2 −10.5 +10.7 1768 −0.11 +1.31 −1.42 581(72nd)
2016 5-6 1771 25.7 21.5 +4.2 1711 +4.2 −8.1 +12.3 1806 −0.98 +0.31 −1.29 583(73rd)
2015 5-5 1871 25.5 24.4 +1.1 1768 +5.8 −6.4 +12.2 1804 +0.10 +0.93 −0.83 596(76th)
2014 5-5 1792 21.4 20.4 +1.0 1818 +1.7 −12.9 +14.6 1865 −0.79 +1.02 −1.81 603(78th)
2013 2-7 1548 22.4 27.8 −5.3 1729 −0.7 −5.0 +4.3 1607 −3.20 +0.19 −3.39 539(59th)
2012 6-4 2024 31.6 22.3 +9.3 1730 +3.8 −14.2 +18.0 1949 +0.27 +1.95 −1.69 628(84th)
2011 14-2 2551 37.8 20.4 +17.4 1799 +16.5 −13.4 +29.9 2248 +4.94 +5.73 −0.79 766(98th)
2010 6-4 1760 29.9 17.0 +12.9 1626 +6.6 −11.4 +18.0 1950 −0.72 +1.16 −1.87 611(80th)
2009 4-5 1497 22.7 26.0 −3.3 1722 +0.4 −6.5 +6.9 1672 −1.61 +1.66 −3.28 545(60th)
2008 0-9 967 9.7 38.1 −28.4 1593 −12.1 +12.3 −24.4 889 −5.51 0.00 −5.51 394(13th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.