← Back

CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

South Garland Titans

Enrollment: 1,915 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8

Rank

#246

was #246

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

506

#246 of 249

OVR Grade

61.6

#246 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Dallas Spruce	56% (+2)	—	—	—	—
2	@Nevada Community	51% (+0)	—	—	—	—
3	Irving Nimitz (0-0) 487	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
4	@Garland Rowlett (0-0) 1534	< 2% (-41)	—	—	—	—
5	North Garland (0-0) 1096	8% (-24)	—	—	—	—
7	Garland Sachse (0-0) 1529	< 2% (-41)	—	—	—	—
8	@Garland Lakeview Centennial (0-0) 1510	< 2% (-40)	—	—	—	—
9	Wylie East (0-0) 1679	< 2% (-47)	—	—	—	—
10	@Garland (0-0) 1259	4% (-30)	—	—	—	—
11	Wylie (0-0) 1328	3% (-33)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		82	Wylie East (4) Raiders	79.3 1679	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-1.5	94.9%	D1
2		102	Garland Rowlett (7) Eagles	77.1 1534	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	83.1%	D2
3		103	Garland Sachse (3) Mustangs	77 1529	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	82%	D1
4		112	Garland Lakeview Centennial (6) Patriots	76.8 1510	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	78.5%	D2
5		162	Wylie (1) Pirates	74 1328	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	34.4%	—
6		172	Garland (5) Owls	73 1259	0-0	0-0	—	—	3-4	22.4%	—
7		197	North Garland (2) Raiders	70.5 1096	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	4.7%	—
8		246	South Garland (8) Titans	61.6 506	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how South Garland’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2007

10-2

Rating 647 (87th)

#2 · 2005

8-5

Rating 623 (83rd)

#3 · 2010

8-4

Rating 609 (80th)

#4 · 2004

9-2

Rating 607 (79th)

#5 · 2009

8-5

Rating 592 (76th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	0-9	434	4.8	49.1	−44.3	1186	−27.7	+29.8	−57.5	64	−7.88	0.00	−7.88	236(1st)
2024	3-7	830	19.2	35.8	−16.6	1225	−14.1	+15.0	−29.1	772	−5.16	+0.05	−5.21	367(9th)
2023	2-8	680	18.7	41.1	−22.4	1192	−15.3	+19.5	−34.7	631	−6.70	+0.01	−6.71	338(6th)
2022	1-9	580	12.3	46.1	−33.8	1257	−19.4	+23.9	−43.2	419	−7.68	+0.03	−7.71	293(2nd)
2021	0-10	648	14.7	59.3	−44.6	1351	−17.1	+33.3	−50.4	241	−8.45	0.00	−8.45	271(1st)
2020	2-5	928	21.1	39.7	−18.6	1325	−9.2	+15.1	−24.3	892	−4.23	+0.09	−4.32	—
2019	1-9	682	18.0	42.5	−24.5	1249	−14.2	+20.7	−34.8	629	−7.61	+0.01	−7.62	328(5th)
2018	2-8	742	22.8	37.6	−14.8	1227	−9.3	+16.6	−26.0	851	−6.26	+0.02	−6.27	363(9th)
2017	1-9	658	17.8	45.8	−28.0	1307	−15.0	+21.5	−36.6	585	−7.25	+0.04	−7.28	320(4th)
2016	0-10	675	14.9	40.2	−25.3	1364	−15.6	+15.7	−31.3	718	−7.89	0.00	−7.89	339(6th)
2015	0-3	969	18.3	44.7	−26.3	1312	−17.9	+16.2	−34.1	647	−2.55	0.00	−2.55	—
2014	0-1	1075	27.0	55.0	−28.0	1051	−11.4	+34.0	−45.4	366	−0.93	0.00	−0.93	—
2013	2-8	1161	15.7	24.5	−8.8	1490	−13.3	−3.6	−9.7	1258	−5.53	+0.11	−5.64	456(29th)
2012	7-5	1631	29.8	25.9	+3.9	1547	+0.8	−4.5	+5.3	1633	−1.57	+1.32	−2.89	558(65th)
2011	3-7	1477	23.7	28.4	−4.7	1645	−1.1	−1.1	0.0	1500	−4.15	+0.12	−4.28	520(52nd)
2010	8-4	1866	24.7	18.8	+5.9	1634	+2.3	−10.0	+12.3	1808	+0.28	+2.13	−1.85	609(80th)
2009	8-5	1777	19.2	18.4	+0.8	1714	−1.1	−11.1	+10.0	1750	−0.08	+2.24	−2.32	592(76th)
2008	5-6	1614	26.4	31.0	−4.6	1680	+3.1	−0.2	+3.3	1582	−2.12	+0.80	−2.92	544(60th)
2007	10-2	1979	30.3	17.1	+13.2	1629	+7.9	−11.4	+19.3	1982	+1.82	+2.90	−1.08	647(87th)
2006	4-7	1554	24.1	26.8	−2.7	1613	−1.2	−3.3	+2.2	1555	−3.38	+0.46	−3.85	537(58th)
2005	8-5	1898	22.3	17.2	+5.2	1714	+1.5	−12.5	+14.0	1850	+0.06	+2.16	−2.10	623(83rd)
2004	9-2	1780	31.3	18.1	+13.2	1546	+7.8	−7.6	+15.5	1887	+0.76	+2.09	−1.33	607(79th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.