| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conroe (3-3) 1530 |
> 98% (+41) | W 70-10 | 3119 | +39.6 | −25.2 | +0.18 | — |
| 2 | 86% (+17) | L 28-31 | 2254 | +19.6 | −10.6 | — | −0.28 | |
| 3 | 79% (+13) | W 58-7 | 3280 | +36.0 | −35.2 | +0.73 | — | |
| 4 | Humble Kingwood (3-4) 1639 |
95% (+29) | W 63-28 | 2486 | +33.1 | −6.4 | +0.38 | — |
| 5 | Crosby (4-3) 1793 |
96% (+30) | W 45-3 | 2861 | +22.0 | −32.4 | +0.37 | — |
| 6 | 56% (+2) | W 42-14 | 3014 | +33.0 | −27.6 | +0.92 | — | |
| 7 | Humble (1-6) 1472 |
> 98% (+44) | W 70-6 | 3108 | +41.0 | −23.4 | +0.17 | — |
| 9 | 27% (-9) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 10 | 70% (+8) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 11 | Channelview (0-7) 780 |
> 98% (+72) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#6
was #6
Record
6-1
4-0 district
Elo
2580
#6 of 249
OVR Grade
92.9
#6 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
97.5
#2 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
94.5
#5 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2875
#2 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 17-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Sheldon CE King’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2025
13-3
Rating 811 (99th)
#2 · 2022
9-5
Rating 723 (96th)
#3 · 2021
10-3
Rating 722 (96th)
#4 · 2023
9-4
Rating 692 (93rd)
#5 · 2020
8-4
Rating 665 (90th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.