← Back

CLASS 6A · District 27-6A

Schertz Clemens Buffaloes

Enrollment: 2,651 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#151

was #151

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1372

#151 of 249

OVR Grade

74.7

#151 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	San Antonio Roosevelt (0-0) 1442	43% (-3)	—	—	—	—
2	San Antonio Churchill (0-0) 1132	73% (+10)	—	—	—	—
3	@New Braunfels	20% (-13)	—	—	—	—
4	@Converse Judson (0-0) 1481	39% (-4)	—	—	—	—
5	San Antonio East Central (0-0) 1378	49% (0)	—	—	—	—
7	@New Braunfels Canyon (0-0) 1354	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
8	@San Marcos (0-0) 1583	29% (-8)	—	—	—	—
9	Converse Wagner (0-0) 1169	70% (+8)	—	—	—	—
10	@San Antonio Pieper (0-0) 1661	23% (-12)	—	—	—	—
11	#17Cibolo Steele (0-0) 2273	2% (-36)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 27-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		17	Cibolo Steele (2) Knights	88.3 2273	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D1
2		83	San Antonio Pieper (8) Warriors	79 1661	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.5	87.7%	D2
3		97	San Marcos (6) Rattlers	77.9 1583	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	76.4%	D2
4		118	Converse Judson (5) Rockets	76.3 1481	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	54.5%	D1
5		148	San Antonio East Central (1) Hornets	74.8 1378	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	28.8%	—
6		151	Schertz Clemens (3) Buffaloes	74.7 1372	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	26.5%	—
7		156	New Braunfels Canyon (4) Cougars	74.4 1354	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.5	21.6%	—
8		185	Converse Wagner (7) Thunderbirds	71.6 1169	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.4-5.6	4.4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Schertz Clemens’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2017

8-3

Rating 673 (91st)

#2 · 2019

10-2

Rating 663 (90th)

#3 · 2015

11-3

Rating 661 (89th)

#4 · 2005

10-1

Rating 631 (85th)

#5 · 2020

4-5

Rating 624 (83rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1369	25.5	24.7	+0.8	1398	−2.9	−0.7	−2.2	1445	−3.69	+0.26	−3.96	504(46th)
2024	2-8	1133	19.0	33.0	−14.0	1491	−11.2	+4.0	−15.2	1121	−5.60	+0.06	−5.66	440(24th)
2023	4-6	1266	25.8	25.5	+0.3	1418	−5.4	−1.6	−3.7	1406	−3.85	+0.43	−4.28	493(42nd)
2022	4-6	1297	24.5	25.7	−1.2	1488	−5.2	−2.7	−2.5	1438	−3.71	+0.41	−4.11	493(42nd)
2021	2-8	1415	10.1	25.2	−15.1	1825	−9.2	−7.6	−1.6	1460	−3.24	+0.58	−3.82	513(49th)
2020	4-5	1897	30.7	27.8	+2.9	1880	+9.9	−8.5	+18.4	1960	−0.91	+0.77	−1.68	624(83rd)
2019	10-2	2229	33.5	18.8	+14.8	1725	+9.8	−14.0	+23.8	2095	+3.73	+4.26	−0.53	663(90th)
2018	6-5	1918	24.1	23.1	+1.0	1849	+2.7	−10.9	+13.6	1840	+0.16	+1.54	−1.37	613(81st)
2017	8-3	2085	25.9	12.8	+13.1	1776	+2.2	−22.1	+24.4	2109	+2.26	+2.55	−0.29	673(91st)
2016	5-5	1782	36.3	23.3	+13.0	1724	+12.9	−10.1	+22.9	2073	−0.96	+0.54	−1.50	620(82nd)
2015	11-3	2075	41.6	37.3	+4.3	1860	+19.0	−0.2	+19.2	1980	+3.91	+4.11	−0.19	661(89th)
2014	5-6	1615	22.5	25.4	−2.8	1765	+0.8	−6.0	+6.9	1671	−1.94	+0.57	−2.51	556(64th)
2013	2-0	1618	42.0	3.5	+38.5	1023	+9.0	−9.2	+18.2	1955	+0.34	+0.34	0.00	—
2012	0-3	1323	13.0	31.7	−18.7	1583	−13.6	+4.5	−18.1	1048	−2.33	0.00	−2.33	—
2011	1-1	1699	8.5	15.0	−6.5	1298	−15.9	−4.7	−11.2	1221	−0.50	+0.02	−0.52	—
2010	1-1	1802	10.5	24.0	−13.5	1411	−12.2	+1.4	−13.6	1159	−0.18	+0.12	−0.30	—
2009	1-0	1882	27.0	17.0	+10.0	1302	−3.1	−7.4	+4.3	1609	+0.04	+0.04	0.00	—
2008	2-0	1898	26.5	6.0	+20.5	1405	−1.8	−15.8	+14.1	1851	+0.38	+0.38	0.00	—
2007	2-0	1847	20.5	6.5	+14.0	1637	−5.0	−22.6	+17.6	1941	+0.30	+0.30	0.00	—
2006	1-1	1800	22.5	10.0	+12.5	1367	−2.4	−10.2	+7.8	1695	−0.66	+0.20	−0.86	—
2005	10-1	1860	35.7	10.7	+25.0	1281	+6.5	−9.4	+15.9	1899	+1.01	+1.47	−0.45	631(85th)
2004	8-3	1772	30.9	12.5	+18.4	1343	+2.8	−8.9	+11.7	1792	−0.64	+0.77	−1.41	607(79th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.