← Back

CLASS 6A · District 29-6A

San Antonio Stevens Falcons

Enrollment: 2,410 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8

Rank

#217

was #217

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

925

#217 of 249

OVR Grade

67.9

#217 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@San Antonio Veterans Memorial	53% (+1)	—	—	—	—
2	@Del Rio (0-0) 733	69% (+8)	—	—	—	—
3	#35San Antonio Harlan (0-0) 1967	< 2% (-42)	—	—	—	—
4	@San Antonio Taft (0-0) 1164	27% (-10)	—	—	—	—
5	San Antonio Sotomayor (0-0) 1431	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
6	@San Antonio O'Connor (0-0) 1010	41% (-3)	—	—	—	—
7	San Antonio Holmes (0-0) 629	78% (+12)	—	—	—	—
8	@#38San Antonio Brennan (0-0) 1958	< 2% (-41)	—	—	—	—
10	San Antonio Warren (0-0) 1057	37% (-5)	—	—	—	—
11	@San Antonio Marshall (0-0) 670	74% (+10)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 29-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		35	San Antonio Harlan (1) Hawks	83.6 1967	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		38	San Antonio Brennan (2) Bears	83.5 1958	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
3		139	San Antonio Sotomayor (3) Wildcats	75.6 1431	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.4-2.5	92.3%	D2
4		187	San Antonio Taft (4) Raiders	71.5 1164	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.1-3.9	54%	D2
5		201	San Antonio Warren (6) Warriors	69.9 1057	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-4.5	26%	—
6		207	San Antonio O’Connor (7) Panthers	69.2 1010	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.2-4.8	17.2%	—
7		217	San Antonio Stevens (8) Falcons	67.9 925	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-5.3	9.4%	—
8		239	San Antonio Marshall (5) Rams	64.1 670	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-6.7	< 2%	—
9		242	San Antonio Holmes (9) Huskies	63.5 629	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.1-6.9	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Stevens’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2010

11-4

Rating 610 (80th)

#2 · 2015

9-3

Rating 583 (73rd)

#3 · 2014

8-4

Rating 579 (71st)

#4 · 2020

7-5

Rating 572 (69th)

#5 · 2008

7-5

Rating 547 (61st)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	3-7	943	21.1	32.6	−11.5	1212	−13.6	+8.9	−22.5	937	−5.18	+0.12	−5.30	398(15th)
2024	2-8	773	21.0	36.4	−15.4	1290	−11.2	+13.3	−24.6	886	−6.63	+0.04	−6.66	376(11th)
2023	1-9	680	9.9	31.3	−21.4	1309	−20.0	+8.7	−28.7	782	−7.74	+0.01	−7.74	357(8th)
2022	4-6	1147	30.0	32.4	−2.4	1337	+0.8	+8.4	−7.6	1311	−3.99	+0.13	−4.12	463(31st)
2021	1-9	1020	18.1	38.4	−20.3	1534	−8.8	+8.9	−17.6	1059	−6.74	+0.10	−6.84	414(18th)
2020	7-5	1838	26.3	25.8	+0.6	1566	+2.1	−3.4	+5.5	1638	−0.99	+1.98	−2.97	572(69th)
2019	5-6	1461	21.1	22.6	−1.5	1556	−3.0	−2.4	−0.6	1484	−2.25	+0.44	−2.69	512(49th)
2018	4-6	1334	15.3	22.5	−7.2	1530	−10.8	−4.8	−6.0	1349	−2.89	+0.45	−3.34	483(38th)
2017	3-7	1218	20.2	29.7	−9.5	1447	−9.7	+2.1	−11.8	1205	−4.67	+0.15	−4.82	453(29th)
2016	4-6	1464	33.5	29.0	+4.5	1516	+5.1	+1.1	+4.0	1599	−3.41	+0.60	−4.01	527(54th)
2015	9-3	1735	33.9	23.7	+10.2	1492	+4.5	−5.5	+10.0	1750	−0.25	+0.85	−1.11	583(73rd)
2014	8-4	1742	33.6	25.7	+7.9	1487	+6.3	−2.0	+8.3	1708	−0.76	+0.94	−1.71	579(71st)
2013	5-5	1349	33.4	25.0	+8.4	1347	+1.1	+0.3	+0.8	1519	−2.56	+0.26	−2.82	509(48th)
2012	1-9	965	16.8	32.8	−16.0	1508	−11.9	+3.9	−15.8	1106	−7.10	+0.04	−7.14	419(19th)
2011	6-5	1497	22.8	21.4	+1.5	1379	−3.6	−1.4	−2.3	1444	−2.52	+0.75	−3.27	514(50th)
2010	11-4	1920	32.3	27.6	+4.7	1582	+7.4	−0.6	+8.0	1701	+0.57	+2.40	−1.83	610(80th)
2009	7-3	1564	33.0	24.4	+8.6	1404	+5.7	+1.2	+4.5	1612	−0.77	+0.87	−1.64	543(59th)
2008	7-5	1507	27.2	22.6	+4.7	1503	0.0	−3.7	+3.8	1594	−1.96	+1.11	−3.08	547(61st)
2007	4-6	1240	17.5	18.9	−1.4	1340	−9.1	−1.5	−7.6	1309	−4.06	+0.45	−4.51	476(35th)
2006	0-10	805	10.2	35.8	−25.6	1471	−15.6	+10.1	−25.7	856	−7.85	0.00	−7.85	376(11th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.