← Back
CLASS 6A · District 28-6A

San Antonio Roosevelt Rough Riders

Enrollment: 2,379 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7
Rank
#147
was #151
Record
3-3
2-1 district
Elo
1374
#147 of 249
OVR Grade
74.7
#147 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
78.8
#89 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
65.2
#207 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1347
#151 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Schertz Clemens (4-2) 1479
 57% (+3) L 22-50 760 −9.3 +20.3 — −0.88
2
@San Antonio East Central (5-1) 1731
 43% (-3) L 14-40 1141 −5.5 +8.8 — −0.88
3
San Antonio Jay
 66% (+7) W 55-6 2181 +16.1 −11.1 +0.03 —
5
@San Antonio Madison (4-2) 1423
 28% (-9) W 45-43 1476 +21.7 +22.7 +0.20 —
6
San Antonio Lee (3-3) 836
 86% (+17) W 46-23 1427 +5.3 +8.2 +0.02 —
7
@#18San Antonio Johnson (5-0) 2290
 2% (-36) L 18-65 1096 +3.8 +20.0 — −0.14
8
@San Antonio Brandeis (3-3) 1461
 41% (-3) — — — — — —
9
San Antonio Clark (1-5) 1197
 68% (+7) — — — — — —
10
@San Antonio Reagan (3-2-1) 1744
 18% (-15) — — — — — —
11
San Antonio Churchill (1-5) 1096
 76% (+11) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 28-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 18
Jaguars
88.5
2290
 5-0 3-0 48.8 11.2 6.9-0.1 > 98% D1
2 74
Rattlers
80.3
1744
 3-2 3-0 20.3 25.2 5.8-1.2 > 98% D1
3 147
Rough Riders
74.7
1374
 3-3 2-1 33.3 37.8 4-3 73.6% D2
4 128
Broncos
76
1461
 3-3 1-2 23.7 26.2 3.8-3.2 74.4% D2
5 141
Mavericks
75.4
1423
 4-2 1-2 22.5 18.0 3.2-3.8 43.7% —
6 192
Chargers
70.5
1096
 1-5 1-2 26.3 45.0 2.2-4.8 5.7% —
7 177
Cougars
72
1197
 1-5 1-2 20.7 30.0 1.7-5.3 2.5% —
8 220
Volunteers
66.6
836
 3-3 0-3 23.7 31.7 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Roosevelt’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2009
7-4
Rating 606 (79th)
#2 · 2020
7-4
Rating 601 (78th)
#3 · 2010
7-4
Rating 593 (76th)
#4 · 2012
9-3
Rating 590 (75th)
#5 · 2008
7-4
Rating 588 (74th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 3-7 1145 25.9 39.9 −14.0 1406 −3.1 +14.1 −17.2 1069 −4.54 +0.18 −4.72 434(23rd)
2024 2-8 998 19.6 36.0 −16.4 1433 −9.0 +10.2 −19.1 1022 −5.99 +0.20 −6.19 414(18th)
2023 6-4 1307 27.9 28.9 −1.0 1217 −4.0 +8.0 −12.0 1200 −2.41 +0.29 −2.70 470(33rd)
2022 4-6 1290 27.8 33.5 −5.7 1378 −0.8 +10.2 −11.0 1225 −3.89 +0.15 −4.03 465(32nd)
2021 5-5 1604 25.6 30.4 −4.8 1456 −0.8 +5.7 −6.5 1338 −1.98 +0.39 −2.36 504(46th)
2020 7-4 1918 29.1 21.5 +7.5 1620 +5.8 −6.3 +12.1 1803 +0.82 +2.12 −1.30 601(78th)
2019 9-2 1756 39.1 23.2 +15.9 1431 +11.6 −2.6 +14.1 1854 +0.95 +1.84 −0.88 587(74th)
2018 4-6 1269 20.7 20.8 −0.1 1472 −7.6 −5.1 −2.5 1438 −3.66 +0.47 −4.12 488(40th)
2017 3-7 1228 21.2 42.2 −21.0 1642 −5.2 +9.3 −14.5 1137 −3.93 +0.19 −4.12 445(26th)
2016 4-6 1418 26.4 35.1 −8.7 1622 +3.0 +6.0 −3.0 1425 −2.45 +0.47 −2.92 501(44th)
2015 4-6 1439 26.8 31.5 −4.7 1642 −1.0 −2.3 +1.2 1531 −2.32 +0.51 −2.82 516(51st)
2014 0-10 961 15.5 39.2 −23.7 1624 −8.5 +10.8 −19.3 1017 −6.80 0.00 −6.80 405(16th)
2013 3-7 1316 21.4 32.6 −11.2 1665 −4.6 −0.6 −4.0 1399 −3.46 +0.14 −3.60 489(40th)
2012 9-3 1879 28.2 23.4 +4.8 1558 +2.2 −5.2 +7.4 1685 +0.97 +2.16 −1.20 590(75th)
2011 2-8 1380 15.5 24.6 −9.1 1713 −7.5 −6.2 −1.3 1467 −4.20 +0.35 −4.55 507(47th)
2010 7-4 1782 24.9 19.5 +5.5 1697 +2.3 −11.3 +13.6 1840 −0.06 +1.69 −1.76 593(76th)
2009 7-4 1905 27.6 20.8 +6.8 1656 +7.9 −6.5 +14.3 1858 +0.40 +2.63 −2.23 606(79th)
2008 7-4 1721 27.5 21.2 +6.4 1672 +6.4 −7.2 +13.6 1840 +0.05 +1.68 −1.62 588(74th)
2007 5-5 1768 24.9 28.6 −3.7 1691 +2.5 −2.6 +5.1 1627 −0.63 +1.03 −1.66 566(67th)
2006 5-5 1559 16.0 18.5 −2.5 1644 −6.7 −10.8 +4.1 1603 −1.54 +1.12 −2.66 545(60th)
2005 4-6 1416 20.6 19.4 +1.2 1609 −0.8 −6.0 +5.3 1631 −2.84 +0.41 −3.25 536(57th)
2004 6-4 1595 24.1 17.8 +6.3 1479 −0.6 −7.0 +6.4 1660 −1.34 +0.64 −1.98 560(65th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.