← Back

CLASS 6A · District 28-6A

San Antonio Madison Mavericks

Enrollment: 2,477 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#166

was #166

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1302

#166 of 249

OVR Grade

73.6

#166 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	New Braunfels Canyon (0-0) 1354	45% (-2)	—	—	—	—
2	San Antonio Jay	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
3	@San Marcos (0-0) 1583	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
5	San Antonio Roosevelt (0-0) 1442	36% (-6)	—	—	—	—
6	@San Antonio Clark (0-0) 1399	40% (-4)	—	—	—	—
7	San Antonio Reagan (0-0) 1685	17% (-15)	—	—	—	—
8	@San Antonio Churchill (0-0) 1132	67% (+7)	—	—	—	—
9	San Antonio Brandeis (0-0) 1625	20% (-13)	—	—	—	—
10	San Antonio Lee (0-0) 625	94% (+27)	—	—	—	—
11	@#27San Antonio Johnson (0-0) 2140	3% (-34)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 28-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		27	San Antonio Johnson (2) Jaguars	86.3 2140	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D1
2		79	San Antonio Reagan (1) Rattlers	79.4 1685	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-2.1	92.4%	D1
3		87	San Antonio Brandeis (4) Broncos	78.5 1625	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	87.7%	D2
4		135	San Antonio Roosevelt (7) Rough Riders	75.7 1442	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.6-3.4	55.7%	D2
5		146	San Antonio Clark (3) Cougars	75.1 1399	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.3-3.7	39.1%	—
6		166	San Antonio Madison (6) Mavericks	73.6 1302	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.8-4.2	20.1%	—
7		192	San Antonio Churchill (8) Chargers	71 1132	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-5.1	5.2%	—
8		243	San Antonio Lee (5) Volunteers	63.4 625	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.3-6.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Madison’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013

11-4

Rating 704 (94th)

#2 · 2007

13-2

Rating 699 (94th)

#3 · 2012

11-3

Rating 689 (93rd)

#4 · 2018

9-3

Rating 651 (88th)

#5 · 2011

10-5

Rating 650 (87th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	3-8	1285	25.3	35.0	−9.7	1553	−2.5	+5.2	−7.7	1307	−4.38	+0.15	−4.52	478(36th)
2024	2-8	1130	21.5	34.1	−12.6	1454	−6.9	+8.3	−15.2	1119	−5.70	+0.04	−5.74	440(24th)
2023	4-6	1075	27.2	29.2	−2.0	1237	−5.1	+7.4	−12.5	1188	−4.54	+0.33	−4.88	447(27th)
2022	3-7	1392	26.2	28.3	−2.1	1413	−2.4	+3.1	−5.5	1362	−5.02	+0.21	−5.23	491(41st)
2021	6-5	1716	26.7	19.6	+7.1	1567	+1.8	−7.1	+8.9	1723	−0.20	+1.68	−1.88	566(67th)
2020	6-5	1728	23.3	23.8	−0.5	1612	−0.1	−3.3	+3.2	1581	−0.84	+0.79	−1.63	543(60th)
2019	9-3	2027	30.0	25.8	+4.2	1613	+6.4	−3.6	+10.0	1750	+1.34	+2.20	−0.86	599(77th)
2018	9-3	2078	37.4	20.3	+17.1	1620	+12.7	−8.4	+21.1	2029	+1.99	+2.87	−0.88	651(88th)
2017	4-7	1624	36.2	37.0	−0.8	1744	+11.4	+4.0	+7.3	1684	−2.12	+0.64	−2.76	556(64th)
2016	4-7	1398	20.5	23.6	−3.1	1815	−0.5	−8.6	+8.0	1700	−2.50	+0.30	−2.80	545(60th)
2015	0-10	1180	21.6	43.9	−22.3	1836	−2.5	+6.8	−9.2	1269	−5.50	0.00	−5.50	469(33rd)
2014	4-6	1770	18.5	23.3	−4.8	1737	−3.2	−7.0	+3.7	1593	−1.68	+0.89	−2.57	556(64th)
2013	11-4	2160	40.3	25.3	+15.0	1830	+17.0	−10.7	+27.7	2193	+3.45	+4.52	−1.07	704(94th)
2012	11-3	2151	39.4	20.1	+19.4	1742	+16.5	−11.8	+28.2	2206	+2.85	+3.55	−0.70	689(93rd)
2011	10-5	2077	31.7	31.5	+0.3	1807	+11.5	−2.1	+13.6	1839	+2.35	+3.88	−1.53	650(87th)
2010	7-4	1795	29.7	24.5	+5.2	1751	+8.5	−7.4	+15.9	1897	+0.64	+2.94	−2.30	606(79th)
2009	6-4	1818	28.0	17.9	+10.1	1680	+7.9	−9.3	+17.3	1932	−0.32	+1.57	−1.90	611(80th)
2008	9-3	1979	36.0	25.6	+10.4	1687	+15.7	−3.0	+18.7	1967	+1.51	+2.69	−1.18	630(84th)
2007	13-2	2157	37.0	17.6	+19.4	1749	+14.5	−15.1	+29.7	2242	+4.63	+5.09	−0.46	699(94th)
2006	5-5	1619	29.8	24.2	+5.6	1715	+8.9	−4.9	+13.8	1845	−1.66	+0.92	−2.59	581(72nd)
2005	11-3	2006	29.5	21.5	+8.0	1651	+9.7	−5.2	+14.9	1872	+1.95	+3.10	−1.15	634(85th)
2004	8-4	1486	26.8	24.5	+2.3	1625	+5.4	−3.2	+8.6	1714	−0.71	+1.76	−2.47	555(63rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.