← Back

CLASS 6A · District 28-6A

San Antonio Lee Volunteers

Enrollment: 2,503 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#243

was #243

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

625

#243 of 249

OVR Grade

63.4

#243 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@San Antonio Edison	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
2	Kyle Lehman	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
3	@San Antonio MacArthur	58% (+3)	—	—	—	—
5	#27San Antonio Johnson (0-0) 2140	< 2% (-61)	—	—	—	—
6	@San Antonio Roosevelt (0-0) 1442	3% (-33)	—	—	—	—
7	San Antonio Clark (0-0) 1399	4% (-31)	—	—	—	—
8	@San Antonio Reagan (0-0) 1685	< 2% (-42)	—	—	—	—
9	San Antonio Churchill (0-0) 1132	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
10	@San Antonio Madison (0-0) 1302	6% (-27)	—	—	—	—
11	San Antonio Brandeis (0-0) 1625	< 2% (-40)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 28-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		27	San Antonio Johnson (2) Jaguars	86.3 2140	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D1
2		79	San Antonio Reagan (1) Rattlers	79.4 1685	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-2.1	92.4%	D1
3		87	San Antonio Brandeis (4) Broncos	78.5 1625	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	87.7%	D2
4		135	San Antonio Roosevelt (7) Rough Riders	75.7 1442	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.6-3.4	55.7%	D2
5		146	San Antonio Clark (3) Cougars	75.1 1399	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.3-3.7	39.1%	—
6		166	San Antonio Madison (6) Mavericks	73.6 1302	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.8-4.2	20.1%	—
7		192	San Antonio Churchill (8) Chargers	71 1132	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-5.1	5.2%	—
8		243	San Antonio Lee (5) Volunteers	63.4 625	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.3-6.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Lee’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2014

4-6

Rating 484 (38th)

#2 · 2006

3-7

Rating 482 (37th)

#3 · 2008

2-8

Rating 477 (36th)

#4 · 2015

6-4

Rating 477 (36th)

#5 · 2007

2-8

Rating 448 (27th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	535	9.3	31.7	−22.4	1163	−26.3	+9.8	−36.1	598	−6.54	+0.01	−6.55	316(4th)
2024	1-9	545	9.3	38.0	−28.7	1184	−24.1	+17.3	−41.3	467	−7.68	+0.01	−7.69	300(3rd)
2023	0-10	409	5.1	41.6	−36.5	1269	−25.5	+18.9	−44.4	389	−8.64	0.00	−8.64	281(2nd)
2022	2-8	820	11.0	38.5	−27.5	1351	−18.3	+14.7	−33.0	676	−5.98	+0.06	−6.04	348(7th)
2021	1-9	782	12.7	45.2	−32.5	1494	−13.9	+19.0	−32.9	677	−6.04	+0.01	−6.05	341(6th)
2020	1-8	818	8.8	45.3	−36.6	1637	−14.3	+16.5	−30.7	731	−5.18	+0.02	−5.20	348(7th)
2019	2-8	845	19.9	41.4	−21.5	1403	−7.3	+16.8	−24.0	899	−5.72	+0.08	−5.80	378(11th)
2018	0-10	641	16.2	47.7	−31.5	1412	−12.1	+22.9	−35.0	625	−7.86	0.00	−7.86	323(5th)
2017	1-7	887	13.2	36.2	−23.0	1473	−16.2	+7.5	−23.8	906	−4.43	+0.10	−4.54	383(12th)
2016	2-8	966	21.2	36.6	−15.4	1420	−6.7	+12.3	−19.0	1025	−5.85	+0.02	−5.88	407(16th)
2015	6-4	1308	39.0	41.3	−2.3	1381	+7.1	+13.9	−6.8	1329	−1.52	+0.67	−2.19	477(36th)
2014	4-6	1236	30.4	30.2	+0.2	1427	+2.8	+6.0	−3.2	1420	−3.31	+0.15	−3.46	484(38th)
2013	3-7	1023	18.0	33.8	−15.8	1458	−13.3	+5.3	−18.7	1034	−4.18	+0.12	−4.30	414(18th)
2012	1-9	858	17.3	43.2	−25.9	1475	−11.3	+15.3	−26.6	834	−6.68	+0.01	−6.69	373(10th)
2011	2-8	998	12.8	36.2	−23.4	1622	−10.8	+7.8	−18.7	1034	−5.18	+0.12	−5.31	415(18th)
2010	1-9	963	12.8	41.3	−28.5	1610	−10.0	+12.8	−22.9	929	−5.24	+0.02	−5.27	399(15th)
2009	1-9	985	15.1	40.9	−25.8	1592	−6.0	+15.3	−21.3	968	−5.44	+0.13	−5.57	404(16th)
2008	2-8	1203	22.1	31.0	−8.9	1580	0.0	+5.7	−5.6	1360	−4.51	+0.10	−4.62	477(36th)
2007	2-8	1047	24.2	37.7	−13.5	1616	−0.5	+10.0	−10.5	1237	−5.13	+0.04	−5.17	448(27th)
2006	3-7	1235	24.1	32.4	−8.3	1576	+0.6	+6.2	−5.6	1359	−2.96	+0.24	−3.21	482(37th)
2005	1-9	901	12.1	33.1	−21.0	1590	−9.4	+8.2	−17.5	1061	−5.97	+0.05	−6.02	413(18th)
2004	2-8	974	10.6	32.6	−22.0	1527	−13.2	+7.5	−20.6	984	−5.28	+0.26	−5.55	412(17th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.