← Back
CLASS 6A · District 28-6A

San Antonio Lee Volunteers

Enrollment: 2,503 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#220
was #216
Record
3-3
0-3 district
Elo
836
#220 of 249
OVR Grade
66.6
#220 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
65
#220 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
65.1
#208 of 249 in 6A
Perf
854
#218 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@San Antonio Edison
 90% (+21) W 50-19 863 −6.4 +19.1 +0.00 —
2
Kyle Lehman
 17% (-15) W 33-7 1445 −9.1 −6.9 +0.03 —
3
@San Antonio MacArthur
 73% (+9) W 16-3 924 −30.0 −7.0 +0.01 —
5
#18San Antonio Johnson (5-0) 2290
 < 2% (-54) L 6-66 771 −8.2 +21.0 — −0.14
6
@San Antonio Roosevelt (3-3) 1374
 14% (-17) L 23-46 772 −14.1 +15.0 — −0.89
7
San Antonio Clark (1-5) 1197
 27% (-10) L 14-49 347 −17.4 +28.7 — −0.95
8
@San Antonio Reagan (3-2-1) 1744
 2% (-36) — — — — — —
9
San Antonio Churchill (1-5) 1096
 25% (-10) — — — — — —
10
@San Antonio Madison (4-2) 1423
 8% (-23) — — — — — —
11
San Antonio Brandeis (3-3) 1461
 7% (-25) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 28-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 18
Jaguars
88.5
2290
 5-0 3-0 48.8 11.2 6.9-0.1 > 98% D1
2 74
Rattlers
80.3
1744
 3-2 3-0 20.3 25.2 5.8-1.2 > 98% D1
3 147
Rough Riders
74.7
1374
 3-3 2-1 33.3 37.8 4-3 73.6% D2
4 128
Broncos
76
1461
 3-3 1-2 23.7 26.2 3.8-3.2 74.4% D2
5 141
Mavericks
75.4
1423
 4-2 1-2 22.5 18.0 3.2-3.8 43.7% —
6 192
Chargers
70.5
1096
 1-5 1-2 26.3 45.0 2.2-4.8 5.7% —
7 177
Cougars
72
1197
 1-5 1-2 20.7 30.0 1.7-5.3 2.5% —
8 220
Volunteers
66.6
836
 3-3 0-3 23.7 31.7 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Lee’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2014
4-6
Rating 484 (38th)
#2 · 2006
3-7
Rating 482 (37th)
#3 · 2008
2-8
Rating 477 (36th)
#4 · 2015
6-4
Rating 477 (36th)
#5 · 2007
2-8
Rating 448 (27th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 535 9.3 31.7 −22.4 1163 −26.3 +9.8 −36.1 598 −6.54 +0.01 −6.55 316(4th)
2024 1-9 545 9.3 38.0 −28.7 1184 −24.1 +17.3 −41.3 467 −7.68 +0.01 −7.69 300(3rd)
2023 0-10 409 5.1 41.6 −36.5 1269 −25.5 +18.9 −44.4 389 −8.64 0.00 −8.64 281(2nd)
2022 2-8 820 11.0 38.5 −27.5 1351 −18.3 +14.7 −33.0 676 −5.98 +0.06 −6.04 348(7th)
2021 1-9 782 12.7 45.2 −32.5 1494 −13.9 +19.0 −32.9 677 −6.04 +0.01 −6.05 341(6th)
2020 1-8 818 8.8 45.3 −36.6 1637 −14.3 +16.5 −30.7 731 −5.18 +0.02 −5.20 348(7th)
2019 2-8 845 19.9 41.4 −21.5 1403 −7.3 +16.8 −24.0 899 −5.72 +0.08 −5.80 378(11th)
2018 0-10 641 16.2 47.7 −31.5 1412 −12.1 +22.9 −35.0 625 −7.86 0.00 −7.86 323(5th)
2017 1-7 887 13.2 36.2 −23.0 1473 −16.2 +7.5 −23.8 906 −4.43 +0.10 −4.54 383(12th)
2016 2-8 966 21.2 36.6 −15.4 1420 −6.7 +12.3 −19.0 1025 −5.85 +0.02 −5.88 407(16th)
2015 6-4 1308 39.0 41.3 −2.3 1381 +7.1 +13.9 −6.8 1329 −1.52 +0.67 −2.19 477(36th)
2014 4-6 1236 30.4 30.2 +0.2 1427 +2.8 +6.0 −3.2 1420 −3.31 +0.15 −3.46 484(38th)
2013 3-7 1023 18.0 33.8 −15.8 1458 −13.3 +5.3 −18.7 1034 −4.18 +0.12 −4.30 414(18th)
2012 1-9 858 17.3 43.2 −25.9 1475 −11.3 +15.3 −26.6 834 −6.68 +0.01 −6.69 373(10th)
2011 2-8 998 12.8 36.2 −23.4 1622 −10.8 +7.8 −18.7 1034 −5.18 +0.12 −5.31 415(18th)
2010 1-9 963 12.8 41.3 −28.5 1610 −10.0 +12.8 −22.9 929 −5.24 +0.02 −5.27 399(15th)
2009 1-9 985 15.1 40.9 −25.8 1592 −6.0 +15.3 −21.3 968 −5.44 +0.13 −5.57 404(16th)
2008 2-8 1203 22.1 31.0 −8.9 1580 0.0 +5.7 −5.6 1360 −4.51 +0.10 −4.62 477(36th)
2007 2-8 1047 24.2 37.7 −13.5 1616 −0.5 +10.0 −10.5 1237 −5.13 +0.04 −5.17 448(27th)
2006 3-7 1235 24.1 32.4 −8.3 1576 +0.6 +6.2 −5.6 1359 −2.96 +0.24 −3.21 482(37th)
2005 1-9 901 12.1 33.1 −21.0 1590 −9.4 +8.2 −17.5 1061 −5.97 +0.05 −6.02 413(18th)
2004 2-8 974 10.6 32.6 −22.0 1527 −13.2 +7.5 −20.6 984 −5.28 +0.26 −5.55 412(17th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.