← Back
CLASS 6A · District 29-6A

San Antonio Holmes Huskies

Enrollment: 2,239 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 9
Rank
#241
was #240
Record
1-5
0-4 district
Elo
523
#241 of 249
OVR Grade
61.9
#241 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
61
#232 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
62.5
#219 of 249 in 6A
Perf
635
#229 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Laredo Martin
 53% (+1) W 28-21 708 −19.3 +12.3 +0.01 —
2
@San Antonio MacArthur
 65% (+6) L 21-27 449 −25.0 +17.0 — −1.00
3
San Antonio Sotomayor (5-2) 1586
 2% (-37) L 6-35 791 −16.8 +11.5 — −0.80
4
@San Antonio O'Connor (3-3) 1131
 11% (-20) L 20-36 827 −11.1 +15.8 — −0.96
6
#41San Antonio Brennan (5-1) 2028
 < 2% (-58) L 7-70 798 −4.1 +23.9 — −0.32
7
@San Antonio Stevens (2-5) 800
 34% (-6) L 0-13 238 −43.1 +7.3 — −0.99
8
San Antonio Warren (4-3) 1317
 3% (-32) — — — — — —
9
@San Antonio Marshall (1-5) 693
 33% (-7) — — — — — —
10
San Antonio Harlan (5-1) 1927
 < 2% (-56) — — — — — —
11
@San Antonio Taft (4-3) 1192
 6% (-27) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 29-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 41
Bears
84.6
2028
 5-1 4-0 50.5 7.0 7.6-0.4 > 98% D1
2 53
Hawks
83
1927
 5-1 4-0 41.5 13.8 7.2-0.8 > 98% D1
3 102
Wildcats
77.9
1586
 5-2 4-1 26.7 17.1 5.9-2.1 > 98% D2
4 162
Warriors
73.8
1317
 4-3 3-2 29.4 30.4 4.9-3.1 97.9% D2
5 178
Raiders
72
1192
 4-3 2-3 24.9 29.4 3.7-4.3 2.1% —
6 185
Panthers
71
1131
 3-3 2-2 26.2 24.0 3.5-4.5 < 2% —
7 222
Falcons
66
800
 2-5 1-4 10.9 36.1 1.7-6.3 < 2% —
8 232
Rams
64.4
693
 1-5 0-4 12.8 45.2 1.2-6.8 < 2% —
9 241
Huskies
61.9
523
 1-5 0-4 13.7 33.7 0.4-7.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Holmes’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021
5-5
Rating 491 (41st)
#2 · 2012
4-6
Rating 458 (30th)
#3 · 2010
3-7
Rating 451 (28th)
#4 · 2011
4-6
Rating 448 (27th)
#5 · 2016
5-5
Rating 417 (19th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 1-9 508 15.2 46.0 −30.8 1237 −19.1 +22.2 −41.3 468 −7.27 +0.01 −7.28 297(2nd)
2024 1-9 529 22.7 47.8 −25.1 1277 −9.8 +25.0 −34.9 628 −7.50 +0.01 −7.51 320(4th)
2023 1-9 592 22.8 51.7 −28.9 1255 −7.6 +30.0 −37.5 562 −7.50 +0.02 −7.52 320(4th)
2022 0-10 570 9.5 41.0 −31.5 1296 −21.5 +16.7 −38.2 544 −8.38 0.00 −8.38 309(3rd)
2021 5-5 1284 26.8 24.1 +2.7 1396 −4.3 −2.8 −1.5 1462 −3.04 +0.31 −3.34 491(41st)
2020 1-7 790 11.9 36.4 −24.5 1539 −13.7 +8.6 −22.3 942 −4.81 +0.09 −4.89 373(10th)
2019 0-10 674 2.6 37.0 −34.4 1559 −20.8 +11.6 −32.4 689 −7.06 0.00 −7.06 335(5th)
2018 1-9 843 17.0 35.0 −18.0 1545 −8.6 +8.4 −17.0 1075 −6.04 +0.06 −6.10 402(15th)
2017 2-8 773 17.3 35.4 −18.1 1256 −15.1 +12.2 −27.3 817 −6.59 +0.13 −6.72 362(9th)
2016 5-5 1158 22.9 35.1 −12.2 1251 −8.9 +12.1 −21.1 973 −3.34 +0.21 −3.56 417(19th)
2015 4-6 932 29.1 35.7 −6.6 1261 −4.7 +12.7 −17.5 1063 −4.27 +0.14 −4.41 408(17th)
2014 0-10 540 11.1 37.5 −26.4 1343 −19.1 +14.3 −33.4 665 −8.04 0.00 −8.04 320(4th)
2013 0-10 744 10.1 48.8 −38.7 1440 −18.7 +22.0 −40.7 482 −7.63 0.00 −7.63 315(4th)
2012 4-6 1113 30.9 36.4 −5.5 1423 +1.3 +9.4 −8.0 1299 −4.27 +0.41 −4.68 458(30th)
2011 4-6 1158 19.2 23.6 −4.4 1260 −10.0 +3.1 −13.1 1172 −4.16 +0.14 −4.30 448(27th)
2010 3-7 1008 35.2 34.8 +0.4 1280 +5.8 +14.0 −8.2 1296 −5.56 +0.20 −5.75 451(28th)
2009 2-8 780 23.6 40.4 −16.8 1292 −5.8 +20.3 −26.1 848 −6.34 +0.05 −6.39 370(10th)
2008 1-9 679 18.5 42.1 −23.6 1350 −10.7 +20.0 −30.6 734 −7.24 +0.00 −7.24 346(7th)
2007 1-9 744 9.0 38.4 −29.4 1360 −17.1 +17.2 −34.3 644 −7.25 +0.32 −7.57 342(6th)
2006 2-8 1012 17.9 36.6 −18.7 1383 −8.9 +12.7 −21.6 959 −6.14 +0.06 −6.20 409(17th)
2005 3-7 1019 22.8 36.2 −13.4 1296 −4.0 +15.8 −19.7 1006 −5.71 +0.15 −5.86 416(19th)
2004 2-8 949 18.2 42.1 −23.9 1266 −11.4 +21.3 −32.7 681 −6.95 +0.03 −6.99 369(10th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.