← Back

CLASS 6A · District 27-6A

San Antonio East Central Hornets

Enrollment: 3,579 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#148

was #148

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1378

#148 of 249

OVR Grade

74.8

#148 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@#35San Antonio Harlan (0-0) 1967	8% (-24)	—	—	—	—
2	San Antonio Roosevelt (0-0) 1442	43% (-3)	—	—	—	—
3	@San Antonio Clark (0-0) 1399	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—
4	New Braunfels Canyon (0-0) 1354	53% (+1)	—	—	—	—
5	@Schertz Clemens (0-0) 1372	51% (+0)	—	—	—	—
7	Converse Wagner (0-0) 1169	71% (+8)	—	—	—	—
8	@San Antonio Pieper (0-0) 1661	23% (-11)	—	—	—	—
9	#17Cibolo Steele (0-0) 2273	2% (-36)	—	—	—	—
10	@Converse Judson (0-0) 1481	39% (-4)	—	—	—	—
11	San Marcos (0-0) 1583	30% (-8)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 27-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		17	Cibolo Steele (2) Knights	88.3 2273	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D1
2		83	San Antonio Pieper (8) Warriors	79 1661	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.5	87.7%	D2
3		97	San Marcos (6) Rattlers	77.9 1583	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	76.4%	D2
4		118	Converse Judson (5) Rockets	76.3 1481	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	54.5%	D1
5		148	San Antonio East Central (1) Hornets	74.8 1378	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	28.8%	—
6		151	Schertz Clemens (3) Buffaloes	74.7 1372	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	26.5%	—
7		156	New Braunfels Canyon (4) Cougars	74.4 1354	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.5	21.6%	—
8		185	Converse Wagner (7) Thunderbirds	71.6 1169	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.4-5.6	4.4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio East Central’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021

7-5

Rating 589 (75th)

#2 · 2024

9-4

Rating 575 (70th)

#3 · 2011

8-4

Rating 570 (69th)

#4 · 2012

8-4

Rating 566 (67th)

#5 · 2019

4-5

Rating 525 (54th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	1142	23.2	33.4	−10.2	1534	−3.0	+5.5	−8.6	1285	−5.53	+0.38	−5.91	463(31st)
2024	9-4	1713	40.8	30.5	+10.2	1497	+11.5	+2.1	+9.5	1736	−0.62	+1.02	−1.64	575(70th)
2023	4-7	1332	26.1	34.7	−8.6	1511	−2.0	+5.8	−7.8	1306	−3.84	+0.26	−4.10	486(39th)
2022	2-8	1110	15.2	32.3	−17.1	1595	−11.5	+1.9	−13.5	1164	−5.43	+0.17	−5.60	440(24th)
2021	7-5	1822	23.2	23.2	0.0	1748	+1.0	−8.3	+9.3	1733	+0.57	+2.45	−1.88	589(75th)
2020	2-7	1387	15.4	34.3	−18.9	1807	−6.1	+0.3	−6.4	1340	−2.88	+0.29	−3.16	488(40th)
2019	4-5	1513	25.9	33.0	−7.1	1705	+1.7	−0.4	+2.1	1553	−0.93	+0.64	−1.57	525(54th)
2018	4-6	1403	24.1	30.0	−5.9	1672	+0.5	−0.7	+1.2	1530	−1.84	+0.67	−2.52	513(49th)
2017	0-10	918	11.2	44.6	−33.4	1887	−9.0	+8.6	−17.6	1060	−5.30	0.00	−5.30	423(20th)
2016	1-9	1053	18.1	46.4	−28.3	1784	−3.8	+11.7	−15.5	1113	−4.74	+0.16	−4.90	433(23rd)
2015	4-7	1327	30.5	34.4	−3.9	1456	+2.1	+7.9	−5.8	1355	−4.17	+0.24	−4.41	482(37th)
2014	6-5	1445	28.5	32.5	−4.0	1494	+1.7	+6.4	−4.7	1383	−2.10	+1.11	−3.21	498(43rd)
2013	5-6	1322	25.5	30.7	−5.2	1505	−2.1	+2.4	−4.5	1387	−3.10	+0.25	−3.35	488(40th)
2012	8-4	1650	26.8	17.6	+9.2	1472	−1.3	−9.9	+8.6	1715	−0.90	+0.66	−1.56	566(67th)
2011	8-4	1618	35.5	18.2	+17.3	1263	+3.9	−3.3	+7.3	1681	−2.25	+0.59	−2.84	570(69th)
2010	7-4	1457	28.5	20.2	+8.4	1200	−2.0	+0.1	−2.1	1448	−2.73	+0.76	−3.50	512(49th)
2009	4-7	1242	26.3	28.3	−2.0	1344	−3.5	+4.6	−8.0	1299	−4.80	+0.12	−4.92	472(34th)
2008	3-7	1093	22.3	27.4	−5.1	1310	−8.0	+4.9	−13.0	1176	−5.41	+0.05	−5.46	443(26th)
2007	7-5	1426	27.4	27.6	−0.2	1301	−1.8	+5.6	−7.4	1314	−2.89	+0.47	−3.36	497(43rd)
2006	5-6	1216	31.4	29.5	+1.9	1227	+0.4	+9.6	−9.2	1270	−4.81	+0.40	−5.21	469(33rd)
2005	4-6	1245	23.1	23.5	−0.4	1264	−6.4	+3.3	−9.7	1257	−4.49	+0.11	−4.60	471(33rd)
2004	2-8	1018	19.5	38.0	−18.5	1320	−9.1	+17.6	−26.8	831	−6.25	+0.18	−6.42	396(14th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.