| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Antonio O'Connor (3-3) 1131 |
93% (+25) | W 35-28 | 1402 | +3.9 | +7.8 | +0.03 | — |
| 2 | @Laredo United South (2-4) 988 |
95% (+28) | W 17-7 | 1305 | −15.0 | −7.2 | +0.02 | — |
| 3 | New Braunfels Canyon (3-3) 1358 |
69% (+8) | L 12-20 | 1113 | −11.3 | +4.1 | — | −0.84 |
| 5 | San Antonio Reagan (3-2-1) 1744 |
42% (-3) | L 20-35 | 1181 | −2.7 | +10.1 | — | −0.74 |
| 6 | 3% (-34) | L 25-38 | 1946 | +10.8 | −7.0 | — | −0.14 | |
| 7 | @San Antonio Churchill (1-5) 1096 |
80% (+13) | W 33-29 | 1143 | −10.3 | +4.0 | +0.04 | — |
| 8 | San Antonio Roosevelt (3-3) 1374 |
59% (+3) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @San Antonio Madison (4-2) 1423 |
54% (+2) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | San Antonio Clark (1-5) 1197 |
75% (+11) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @San Antonio Lee (3-3) 836 |
93% (+25) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#128
was #139
Record
3-3
1-2 district
Elo
1461
#128 of 249
OVR Grade
76
#128 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
72.1
#154 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
73.3
#140 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1348
#150 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 28-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Brandeis’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2014
12-2
Rating 702 (94th)
#2 · 2019
13-1
Rating 694 (93rd)
#3 · 2012
12-2
Rating 688 (93rd)
#4 · 2018
11-3
Rating 655 (88th)
#5 · 2013
10-2
Rating 648 (87th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.