← Back
CLASS 6A · District 10-6A

Royse City Bulldogs

Enrollment: 2,914 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#77
was #77
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1686
#77 of 249
OVR Grade
79.4
#77 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Frisco Lonestar
18% (-15)
2 67% (+7)
3
@Wylie East (0-0) 1679
51% (+0)
4
@Forney (0-0) 1808
38% (-5)
5
#14Longview (0-0) 2322
7% (-25)
7
#44Rockwall-Heath (0-0) 1927
27% (-10)
8
@Mesquite Horn (0-0) 1599
59% (+3)
9
#8North Forney (0-0) 2478
4% (-32)
10
@#46Rockwall (0-0) 1908
28% (-9)
11
Tyler Legacy (0-0) 1473
71% (+9)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 10-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 8
Falcons
91.4
2478
0-0 0-0 6.4-0.6 > 98% D2
2 14
Lobos
89
2322
0-0 0-0 5.8-1.2 > 98% D2
3 44
Hawks
83
1927
0-0 0-0 3.8-3.2 70.5% D1
4 46
Yellowjackets
82.8
1908
0-0 0-0 3.7-3.3 65% D1
5 61
Jackrabbits
81.2
1808
0-0 0-0 3.1-3.9 38.6%
6 77
Bulldogs
79.4
1686
0-0 0-0 2.3-4.7 16.7%
7 92
Jaguars
78.1
1599
0-0 0-0 1.8-5.2 8%
8 127
Red Raiders
76.2
1473
0-0 0-0 1.2-5.8 2.2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Royse City’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2022
7-5
Rating 574 (70th)
#2 · 2025
5-5
Rating 566 (67th)
#3 · 2023
3-7
Rating 485 (38th)
#4 · 2024
2-8
Rating 442 (25th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-5 1542 35.7 31.4 +4.3 1671 +7.7 −4.0 +11.7 1792 −1.12 +0.44 −1.56 566(67th)
2024 2-8 1207 23.3 43.8 −20.5 1606 −5.0 +11.6 −16.5 1087 −4.88 +0.26 −5.13 442(25th)
2023 3-7 1277 26.7 35.1 −8.4 1552 −0.7 +5.9 −6.7 1333 −4.29 +0.22 −4.51 485(38th)
2022 7-5 1666 33.5 29.0 +4.5 1597 +7.0 −1.4 +8.4 1710 −0.99 +1.42 −2.41 574(70th)
2019 1-0 1421 37.0 14.0 +23.0 920 −5.4 −7.6 +2.2 1555 +0.03 +0.03 0.00
2018 1-0 1383 32.0 0.0 +32.0 778 −4.2 −8.5 +4.3 1607 +0.01 +0.01 0.00
2017 2-0 1356 36.0 10.5 +25.5 858 −7.6 −6.3 −1.2 1469 +0.02 +0.02 0.00
2016 2-0 1310 22.5 4.5 +18.0 760 −13.1 −5.5 −7.6 1310 +0.06 +0.06 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.