← Back

CLASS 6A · District 25-6A

Round Rock Dragons

Enrollment: 3,899 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#55

was #55

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1849

#55 of 249

OVR Grade

81.9

#55 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Pflugerville Weiss	35% (-6)	—	—	—	—
2	@Temple (0-0) 1744	61% (+4)	—	—	—	—
3	#26Dripping Springs (0-0) 2147	22% (-12)	—	—	—	—
4	@#23Austin Vandegrift (0-0) 2164	21% (-13)	—	—	—	—
5	Round Rock Stony Point (0-0) 1159	95% (+28)	—	—	—	—
6	@#15Austin Westlake (0-0) 2295	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
8	Round Rock Westwood (0-0) 1299	91% (+22)	—	—	—	—
9	@Round Rock McNeil (0-0) 1523	80% (+13)	—	—	—	—
10	#18Lake Travis (0-0) 2244	16% (-16)	—	—	—	—
11	@Round Rock Cedar Ridge (0-0) 1475	83% (+15)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 25-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		15	Austin Westlake (3) Chaparrals	88.6 2295	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.3-0.7	> 98%	D2
2		18	Lake Travis (2) Cavaliers	87.8 2244	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
3		55	Round Rock (1) Dragons	81.9 1849	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.8-2.2	94.8%	D1
4		106	Round Rock McNeil (6) Mavericks	76.9 1523	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.4-3.6	55.7%	D2
5		125	Round Rock Cedar Ridge (5) Raiders	76.2 1475	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.2-3.8	34.9%	—
6		167	Round Rock Westwood (4) Warriors	73.6 1299	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.4-4.6	11.1%	—
7		188	Round Rock Stony Point (7) Tigers	71.5 1159	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.8-5.2	3.6%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Round Rock’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021

9-2

Rating 695 (93rd)

#2 · 2014

10-2

Rating 683 (92nd)

#3 · 2016

10-4

Rating 676 (91st)

#4 · 2022

9-2

Rating 665 (90th)

#5 · 2006

9-4

Rating 661 (89th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-6	1688	35.4	26.5	+8.8	1653	+7.3	−6.7	+14.0	1851	−2.33	+0.66	−2.99	587(74th)
2024	8-3	1771	28.2	18.3	+9.9	1562	+0.5	−12.1	+12.6	1815	−0.14	+1.16	−1.30	591(75th)
2023	4-7	1504	20.6	23.5	−2.9	1724	−0.8	−6.9	+6.1	1653	−3.37	+0.42	−3.79	548(62nd)
2022	9-2	2023	34.8	16.8	+18.0	1718	+13.0	−15.0	+28.0	2199	+1.99	+2.42	−0.43	665(90th)
2021	9-2	2119	36.8	11.0	+25.8	1665	+11.4	−19.7	+31.1	2277	+2.06	+2.92	−0.86	695(93rd)
2020	8-3	2112	36.2	22.5	+13.6	1641	+11.9	−8.6	+20.5	2012	+1.24	+3.02	−1.79	646(87th)
2019	6-4	1647	43.2	30.3	+12.9	1526	+13.1	0.0	+13.1	1828	−0.77	+1.29	−2.06	575(70th)
2018	7-5	1743	47.8	38.4	+9.3	1609	+19.9	+6.7	+13.2	1829	−0.51	+1.18	−1.69	583(73rd)
2017	2-8	1481	30.8	44.3	−13.5	1786	+7.4	+9.6	−2.2	1446	−4.07	+0.13	−4.19	515(50th)
2016	10-4	2117	40.2	26.1	+14.1	1791	+17.9	−9.0	+26.9	2172	+2.48	+3.59	−1.12	676(91st)
2015	8-3	2002	35.1	18.6	+16.5	1641	+10.8	−11.3	+22.1	2053	+1.31	+2.31	−1.00	638(85th)
2014	10-2	2108	33.1	13.2	+19.8	1685	+11.1	−17.7	+28.8	2220	+2.47	+3.22	−0.75	683(92nd)
2013	7-5	1751	34.4	23.8	+10.6	1522	+3.9	−7.8	+11.7	1792	−1.12	+0.97	−2.09	592(76th)
2012	4-7	1478	24.5	27.2	−2.6	1590	−0.3	−0.3	0.0	1501	−3.81	+0.42	−4.23	518(51st)
2011	4-7	1653	24.3	33.1	−8.8	1766	+4.0	+2.2	+1.7	1543	−1.62	+1.13	−2.75	546(61st)
2010	2-8	1259	13.7	29.1	−15.4	1849	−7.5	−4.9	−2.6	1434	−4.55	+0.56	−5.12	505(46th)
2009	4-6	1522	26.0	30.7	−4.7	1660	+2.0	+0.3	+1.7	1542	−2.22	+1.10	−3.32	530(55th)
2008	6-5	1805	25.0	21.5	+3.5	1771	+4.2	−10.0	+14.2	1855	−0.48	+1.77	−2.25	603(78th)
2007	8-5	1993	22.3	17.8	+4.5	1729	+2.4	−12.7	+15.0	1876	−0.14	+2.69	−2.83	634(85th)
2006	9-4	2174	32.2	21.5	+10.7	1688	+11.0	−8.4	+19.4	1984	+0.97	+2.85	−1.88	661(89th)
2005	6-5	1587	22.8	21.2	+1.6	1512	−3.2	−5.8	+2.6	1565	−2.38	+0.81	−3.19	542(59th)
2004	4-6	1230	19.5	23.9	−4.4	1515	−3.8	−0.6	−3.2	1421	−4.12	+0.44	−4.56	493(42nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.