← Back
CLASS 6A · District 25-6A

Round Rock Westwood Warriors

Enrollment: 2,856 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#201
was #200
Record
1-6
0-3 district
Elo
1059
#201 of 249
OVR Grade
69.9
#201 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
65.6
#213 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
71.8
#160 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1073
#191 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Boerne
11% (-20) L 14-34 1343 −7.1 −0.9 — −0.55
2
@Austin High (1-5) 1184
68% (+7) W 24-20 1274 −7.3 +1.7 +0.04 —
3
@Buda Johnson (2-5) 1279
56% (+2) L 26-29 1116 −10.9 +4.4 — −0.92
4
Copperas Cove (5-2) 1566
40% (-4) L 15-49 750 −17.4 +12.6 — −0.89
5 7% (-25) L 0-43 945 −21.8 +0.4 — −0.58
6 48% (-1) L 17-29 1050 −17.8 +0.2 — −0.95
7
#15Austin Westlake (5-1) 2332
< 2% (-51) L 0-57 1030 −10.6 +8.2 — −0.12
8
@#42Round Rock (4-2) 2019
< 2% (-38) — — — — — —
10 46% (-2) — — — — — —
11
@#33Lake Travis (2-2-1) 2062
< 2% (-40) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 25-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 15
Chaparrals
89.2
2332
5-1 2-0 42.0 18.0 5.6-0.4 > 98% D2
2 61
Raiders
81.9
1852
7-0 3-0 46.0 20.4 4.3-1.6 96.3% D2
3 42
Dragons
84.4
2019
4-2 1-1 35.8 34.2 4.1-1.9 > 98% D1
4 33
Cavaliers
85.1
2062
2-2 1-1 38.8 27.6 3.7-2.3 96.6% D1
5 158
Tigers
74.1
1335
3-4 2-1 32.1 33.4 2.2-3.8 7.4% —
6 201
Warriors
69.9
1059
1-6 0-3 13.7 37.3 0.5-5.5 < 2% —
7 191
Mavericks
70.5
1099
0-7 0-3 20.4 56.6 0.6-5.4 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Round Rock Westwood’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2011
10-2
Rating 665 (90th)
#2 · 2012
9-4
Rating 628 (84th)
#3 · 2006
9-3
Rating 604 (78th)
#4 · 2009
7-4
Rating 588 (75th)
#5 · 2010
5-6
Rating 585 (73rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 3-7 1368 27.6 35.3 −7.7 1585 −2.5 +3.0 −5.4 1365 −4.18 +0.20 −4.38 493(42nd)
2024 2-8 1132 20.3 37.7 −17.4 1515 −7.2 +8.6 −15.8 1104 −5.68 +0.42 −6.10 438(24th)
2023 7-3 1646 32.6 17.7 +14.9 1390 +5.3 −5.5 +10.8 1770 −0.87 +0.65 −1.52 580(72nd)
2022 4-6 1137 20.5 36.6 −16.1 1527 −4.7 +9.0 −13.8 1156 −3.05 +0.33 −3.38 441(25th)
2021 1-9 1042 15.4 43.6 −28.2 1618 −10.1 +13.8 −23.8 904 −5.75 +0.18 −5.93 396(14th)
2020 3-6 1395 29.1 41.2 −12.1 1662 +5.4 +9.9 −4.6 1386 −2.11 +0.41 −2.52 487(39th)
2019 4-6 1279 36.9 44.2 −7.3 1545 +6.4 +12.7 −6.3 1342 −2.89 +0.62 −3.51 476(35th)
2018 4-6 1339 29.7 33.8 −4.1 1530 −0.4 +2.6 −3.0 1424 −2.90 +0.21 −3.11 493(42nd)
2017 5-6 1412 39.5 40.7 −1.3 1446 +7.8 +11.3 −3.4 1414 −3.57 +0.47 −4.04 499(44th)
2016 5-5 1368 27.2 31.7 −4.5 1488 −0.2 +3.9 −4.1 1397 −2.36 +0.94 −3.30 492(41st)
2015 0-10 1004 13.9 38.1 −24.2 1713 −8.8 +6.9 −15.7 1107 −5.94 0.00 −5.94 420(20th)
2014 2-8 1254 14.5 32.5 −18.0 1661 −7.5 +2.7 −10.2 1246 −4.53 +0.13 −4.66 463(31st)
2013 4-7 1572 29.5 38.6 −9.2 1742 +6.0 +5.5 +0.5 1513 −2.84 +0.44 −3.29 530(55th)
2012 9-4 2050 22.9 17.5 +5.4 1683 −0.1 −13.3 +13.2 1831 +0.73 +2.21 −1.49 628(84th)
2011 10-2 2103 30.6 14.4 +16.2 1617 +6.2 −13.8 +20.0 1999 +3.01 +3.42 −0.41 665(90th)
2010 5-6 1702 27.4 19.6 +7.7 1647 +2.2 −11.1 +13.2 1831 −2.19 +0.90 −3.09 585(73rd)
2009 7-4 1763 29.8 23.2 +6.6 1645 +4.7 −8.3 +13.0 1825 −0.26 +1.52 −1.78 588(75th)
2008 4-5 1600 28.4 30.3 −1.9 1642 +7.1 +2.1 +5.1 1626 −1.62 +0.84 −2.46 548(62nd)
2007 3-7 1497 16.3 21.3 −5.0 1805 −3.3 −11.2 +8.0 1699 −3.05 +0.85 −3.90 558(65th)
2006 9-3 1795 30.2 23.0 +7.2 1652 +10.1 −5.1 +15.2 1879 +0.87 +2.37 −1.49 604(78th)
2005 2-8 1285 17.2 33.5 −16.3 1658 −3.7 +6.1 −9.8 1254 −4.80 +0.60 −5.40 474(34th)
2004 4-6 1568 23.0 26.2 −3.2 1634 +2.8 −0.1 +2.9 1572 −3.30 +0.68 −3.98 544(60th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.