← Back
CLASS 6A · District 25-6A

Round Rock McNeil Mavericks

Enrollment: 2,706 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#191
was #181
Record
0-7
0-3 district
Elo
1099
#191 of 249
OVR Grade
70.5
#191 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
69.5
#180 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
57.7
#232 of 249 in 6A
Perf
796
#222 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Austin Bowie (5-1) 1816
32% (-7) L 14-62 753 −8.0 +21.9 — −0.65
2
Lake Belton (3-3) 1596
25% (-11) L 24-30 1393 −8.2 −3.9 — −0.65
3
@Leander Rouse (4-3) 1600
46% (-2) L 3-55 436 −19.5 +23.1 — −0.84
4 35% (-6) L 28-56 485 −16.2 +24.4 — −0.85
5
#33Lake Travis (2-2-1) 2062
2% (-36) L 6-59 788 −13.9 +14.6 — −0.26
6 8% (-24) L 29-77 820 +7.2 +34.4 — −0.56
7 44% (-2) L 39-57 900 +4.2 +28.2 — −0.93
8
@#15Austin Westlake (5-1) 2332
< 2% (-49) — — — — — —
9
#42Round Rock (4-2) 2019
2% (-37) — — — — — —
10 54% (+2) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 25-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 15
Chaparrals
89.2
2332
5-1 2-0 42.0 18.0 5.6-0.4 > 98% D2
2 61
Raiders
81.9
1852
7-0 3-0 46.0 20.4 4.3-1.6 96.3% D2
3 42
Dragons
84.4
2019
4-2 1-1 35.8 34.2 4.1-1.9 > 98% D1
4 33
Cavaliers
85.1
2062
2-2 1-1 38.8 27.6 3.7-2.3 96.6% D1
5 158
Tigers
74.1
1335
3-4 2-1 32.1 33.4 2.2-3.8 7.4% —
6 201
Warriors
69.9
1059
1-6 0-3 13.7 37.3 0.5-5.5 < 2% —
7 191
Mavericks
70.5
1099
0-7 0-3 20.4 56.6 0.6-5.4 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Round Rock McNeil’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004
7-6
Rating 573 (70th)
#2 · 2025
6-4
Rating 566 (67th)
#3 · 2008
5-4
Rating 550 (62nd)
#4 · 2023
7-5
Rating 548 (61st)
#5 · 2007
4-6
Rating 546 (61st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-4 1682 39.3 34.8 +4.5 1595 +10.5 +2.8 +7.7 1692 −0.94 +1.93 −2.87 566(67th)
2024 5-6 1531 25.9 30.1 −4.2 1558 −1.0 0.0 −1.0 1475 −3.02 +0.48 −3.50 523(53rd)
2023 7-5 1619 23.7 20.2 +3.5 1491 −2.1 −5.1 +3.0 1575 −1.62 +1.06 −2.68 548(61st)
2022 2-8 1278 22.0 28.8 −6.8 1606 −2.9 −0.3 −2.6 1434 −4.61 +0.34 −4.95 491(41st)
2021 3-7 1230 19.9 39.1 −19.2 1679 −5.6 +6.2 −11.9 1203 −3.38 +0.36 −3.74 452(28th)
2020 0-9 1068 10.8 35.4 −24.7 1635 −13.9 +4.6 −18.4 1039 −6.35 0.00 −6.35 411(17th)
2019 3-7 1348 25.4 35.1 −9.7 1529 −5.2 +2.4 −7.6 1310 −3.80 +0.57 −4.38 478(36th)
2018 4-6 1261 32.4 34.4 −2.0 1543 +3.0 +3.7 −0.7 1482 −2.90 +0.29 −3.19 493(42nd)
2017 1-9 994 25.5 43.6 −18.1 1552 −2.8 +12.6 −15.4 1114 −6.63 +0.10 −6.73 421(20th)
2016 3-6 1284 16.0 31.1 −15.1 1622 −9.2 +0.9 −10.0 1250 −3.43 +0.36 −3.80 465(32nd)
2015 4-6 1464 31.2 34.0 −2.8 1544 +6.0 +6.9 −0.9 1477 −3.11 +0.52 −3.63 511(48th)
2014 3-7 1126 14.9 29.4 −14.5 1539 −10.4 +2.3 −12.7 1182 −4.14 +0.11 −4.25 442(25th)
2013 2-8 1183 20.6 32.7 −12.1 1511 −7.8 +3.7 −11.5 1211 −5.39 +0.29 −5.68 452(28th)
2012 2-8 1161 21.2 35.9 −14.7 1500 −4.0 +9.0 −13.0 1174 −5.11 +0.14 −5.25 446(26th)
2011 1-9 1084 20.8 37.1 −16.3 1691 −2.5 +7.4 −9.9 1251 −4.82 +0.30 −5.12 451(28th)
2010 1-9 1105 17.7 32.8 −15.1 1728 −5.4 +0.2 −5.6 1359 −5.43 +0.27 −5.70 469(33rd)
2009 2-8 1199 24.4 36.1 −11.7 1715 +0.4 +4.2 −3.8 1404 −4.60 +0.62 −5.21 482(37th)
2008 5-4 1565 16.1 18.2 −2.1 1696 −5.1 −11.2 +6.1 1651 −0.88 +1.34 −2.22 550(62nd)
2007 4-6 1425 26.6 31.8 −5.2 1772 +8.0 +0.8 +7.1 1679 −2.95 +0.47 −3.43 546(61st)
2006 4-6 1338 20.1 25.3 −5.2 1565 −2.7 −0.8 −1.9 1453 −3.49 +0.34 −3.83 504(46th)
2005 6-4 1588 22.0 22.7 −0.7 1494 −3.2 −3.1 −0.1 1498 −1.91 +1.16 −3.07 534(57th)
2004 7-6 1763 20.2 21.9 −1.8 1574 −1.6 −4.5 +3.0 1574 −2.41 +1.54 −3.95 573(70th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.