← Back
CLASS 6A · District 25-6A

Round Rock Cedar Ridge Raiders

Enrollment: 2,789 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#125
was #125
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1475
#125 of 249
OVR Grade
76.2
#125 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1 78% (+12)
2
@Copperas Cove (0-0) 1365
61% (+4)
3 37% (-5)
4
Leander Rouse (0-0) 1250
72% (+9)
5 68% (+7)
6 45% (-2)
7
@#18Lake Travis (0-0) 2244
4% (-31)
9 79% (+13)
10
@#15Austin Westlake (0-0) 2295
3% (-33)
11
Round Rock (0-0) 1849
17% (-15)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 25-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 15
Chaparrals
88.6
2295
0-0 0-0 5.3-0.7 > 98% D2
2 18
Cavaliers
87.8
2244
0-0 0-0 5.2-0.8 > 98% D1
3 55
Dragons
81.9
1849
0-0 0-0 3.8-2.2 94.8% D1
4 106
Mavericks
76.9
1523
0-0 0-0 2.4-3.6 55.7% D2
5 125
Raiders
76.2
1475
0-0 0-0 2.2-3.8 34.9%
6 167
Warriors
73.6
1299
0-0 0-0 1.4-4.6 11.1%
7 188
Tigers
71.5
1159
0-0 0-0 0.8-5.2 3.6%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Round Rock Cedar Ridge’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016
11-1
Rating 722 (96th)
#2 · 2017
12-2
Rating 718 (95th)
#3 · 2015
10-2
Rating 681 (92nd)
#4 · 2018
9-3
Rating 654 (88th)
#5 · 2020
6-4
Rating 598 (77th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-5 1483 36.1 40.2 −4.1 1599 +7.0 +8.3 −1.4 1466 −2.02 +0.85 −2.87 517(51st)
2024 3-7 1116 23.3 35.3 −12.0 1543 −4.2 +6.1 −10.3 1243 −4.56 +0.66 −5.21 454(29th)
2023 2-8 1104 11.9 34.3 −22.4 1625 −11.2 +6.3 −17.5 1063 −5.20 +0.60 −5.80 434(23rd)
2022 5-6 1748 23.3 27.5 −4.2 1840 +3.6 −6.6 +10.2 1754 −0.78 +1.30 −2.09 587(74th)
2021 7-4 1847 26.4 19.8 +6.5 1681 +0.5 −13.3 +13.8 1844 +0.59 +1.90 −1.30 593(76th)
2020 6-4 1842 28.0 25.0 +3.0 1786 +6.0 −8.7 +14.7 1867 +0.15 +1.04 −0.90 598(77th)
2019 6-5 1765 37.4 36.5 +0.9 1665 +9.8 +2.6 +7.2 1680 −0.80 +1.76 −2.57 566(67th)
2018 9-3 2176 41.3 27.3 +14.0 1693 +16.2 −6.3 +22.5 2063 +2.03 +2.88 −0.86 654(88th)
2017 12-2 2317 42.6 18.5 +24.1 1697 +16.4 −15.2 +31.6 2291 +3.24 +3.58 −0.34 718(95th)
2016 11-1 2260 45.9 14.6 +31.3 1611 +19.7 −15.5 +35.1 2379 +3.00 +3.10 −0.10 722(96th)
2015 10-2 2122 35.6 16.2 +19.4 1663 +12.2 −14.7 +26.9 2171 +2.84 +3.28 −0.44 681(92nd)
2014 4-7 1563 19.0 22.2 −3.2 1648 −2.7 −4.9 +2.2 1555 −2.95 +0.63 −3.58 532(56th)
2013 8-4 1748 34.4 31.4 +3.0 1539 +6.0 +1.8 +4.2 1605 −0.39 +1.51 −1.90 567(68th)
2012 3-6 1070 27.6 37.6 −10.0 1512 +1.7 +11.2 −9.5 1262 −4.11 +0.63 −4.73 449(28th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.