| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11% (-20) | L 20-45 | 1654 | +8.4 | +2.2 | — | −0.08 | |
| 2 | Highland Park |
37% (-5) | W 49-46 | 2047 | +30.4 | +8.6 | +0.69 | — |
| 3 | Byron Nelson (3-3) 1653 |
69% (+7) | L 44-46 | 1564 | +9.7 | +7.2 | — | −0.57 |
| 4 | @Tyler Legacy (2-4) 1413 |
91% (+22) | W 63-35 | 2072 | +16.5 | −6.4 | +0.11 | — |
| 5 | Forney (2-4) 1531 |
86% (+17) | W 35-28 | 1809 | +9.5 | −2.9 | +0.18 | — |
| 7 | @Royse City (1-5) 1569 |
80% (+14) | W 42-14 | 2311 | +14.7 | −17.8 | +0.27 | — |
| 8 | 12% (-19) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 9 | Mesquite Horn (0-6) 1116 |
97% (+35) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | 44% (-2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 11 | #38Rockwall (4-2) 2040 |
44% (-2) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#44
was #47
Record
4-2
3-0 district
Elo
1987
#44 of 249
OVR Grade
84
#44 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
85.5
#34 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
76.3
#108 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1909
#59 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 10-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Rockwall-Heath’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2020
10-3
Rating 725 (96th)
#2 · 2021
11-2
Rating 690 (93rd)
#3 · 2025
8-4
Rating 682 (92nd)
#4 · 2023
9-3
Rating 635 (85th)
#5 · 2013
6-4
Rating 610 (80th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.