← Back

CLASS 6A · District 7-6A

Richardson Eagles

Enrollment: 2,659 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#100

was #100

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1563

#100 of 249

OVR Grade

77.6

#100 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Wylie East (0-0) 1679	38% (-5)	—	—	—	—
2	Garland Naaman Forest	80% (+13)	—	—	—	—
3	Mansfield Timberview	46% (-1)	—	—	—	—
4	Plano West (0-0) 1440	63% (+5)	—	—	—	—
5	Plano (0-0) 1471	60% (+4)	—	—	—	—
7	@Plano East (0-0) 1352	71% (+8)	—	—	—	—
8	Richardson Berkner (0-0) 1515	55% (+2)	—	—	—	—
9	@Richardson Pearce (0-0) 1228	80% (+13)	—	—	—	—
10	#21Coppell (0-0) 2168	7% (-24)	—	—	—	—
11	@Richardson Lake Highlands (0-0) 1681	38% (-5)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 7-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		21	Coppell (3) Cowboys	86.7 2168	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D1
2		80	Richardson Lake Highlands (5) Wildcats	79.3 1681	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	86.4%	D1
3		100	Richardson (6) Eagles	77.6 1563	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	66.1%	D2
4		110	Richardson Berkner (8) Rams	76.8 1515	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	53.1%	D2
5		128	Plano (4) Wildcats	76.2 1471	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	39.8%	—
6		136	Plano West (1) Wolves	75.7 1440	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-4.1	31.9%	—
7		157	Plano East (2) Panthers	74.4 1352	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	17%	—
8		177	Richardson Pearce (7) Mustangs	72.5 1228	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.5-5.5	5.7%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Richardson’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2025

8-4

Rating 569 (68th)

#2 · 2010

7-4

Rating 521 (52nd)

#3 · 2009

6-5

Rating 516 (50th)

#4 · 2024

7-5

Rating 490 (40th)

#5 · 2004

5-5

Rating 488 (39th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	8-4	1565	31.8	16.2	+15.7	1272	−0.9	−7.4	+6.4	1661	−1.91	+0.81	−2.73	569(68th)
2024	7-5	1348	28.8	25.8	+2.9	1277	−4.1	+2.2	−6.3	1342	−2.69	+0.67	−3.36	490(40th)
2023	4-6	1008	29.5	24.6	+4.9	1190	−5.5	+2.1	−7.6	1310	−4.42	+0.03	−4.45	457(30th)
2022	3-7	893	19.8	29.4	−9.6	1283	−13.5	+5.6	−19.1	1022	−4.77	+0.03	−4.80	402(15th)
2021	1-9	681	14.0	38.9	−24.9	1249	−20.8	+14.2	−35.0	626	−7.58	+0.02	−7.59	326(5th)
2020	5-6	1168	17.6	28.4	−10.7	1304	−15.0	+3.5	−18.5	1037	−3.68	+0.16	−3.83	420(19th)
2019	5-5	1140	26.6	24.4	+2.2	1234	−5.7	+2.6	−8.3	1293	−3.20	+0.10	−3.30	457(30th)
2018	5-5	1024	30.2	38.3	−8.1	1197	−5.0	+14.1	−19.1	1023	−3.35	+0.08	−3.44	411(17th)
2017	1-9	687	20.2	42.7	−22.5	1395	−11.7	+13.7	−25.4	864	−7.06	+0.01	−7.08	360(8th)
2016	0-10	692	6.6	31.2	−24.6	1407	−25.7	+4.1	−29.8	755	−7.87	0.00	−7.87	346(7th)
2015	1-9	944	23.4	43.9	−20.5	1468	−7.9	+13.5	−21.4	965	−6.84	+0.12	−6.96	396(14th)
2014	3-7	1207	20.3	38.2	−17.9	1449	−9.7	+10.0	−19.7	1006	−4.79	+0.24	−5.03	426(21st)
2013	3-7	1138	28.3	34.5	−6.2	1508	−1.8	+5.1	−6.9	1327	−3.71	+0.39	−4.11	464(31st)
2012	4-7	1362	29.1	44.9	−15.8	1701	+1.7	+10.8	−9.1	1273	−2.84	+0.26	−3.10	477(36th)
2011	5-5	1341	27.9	34.0	−6.1	1350	−2.6	+9.1	−11.7	1207	−2.90	+0.36	−3.25	469(33rd)
2010	7-4	1501	23.5	18.5	+5.0	1388	−6.0	−5.0	−1.0	1476	−1.11	+0.60	−1.71	521(52nd)
2009	6-5	1329	26.5	17.6	+8.9	1334	−3.1	−5.0	+1.9	1548	−2.52	+0.45	−2.97	516(50th)
2008	5-5	1167	22.6	20.7	+1.9	1308	−8.0	−2.0	−6.0	1350	−2.94	+0.47	−3.41	473(34th)
2007	0-10	766	8.3	41.9	−33.6	1739	−14.5	+9.8	−24.3	893	−5.80	0.00	−5.80	379(11th)
2006	0-10	893	8.0	44.4	−36.4	1679	−14.2	+13.7	−27.9	803	−6.70	0.00	−6.70	377(11th)
2005	2-8	1082	22.0	25.6	−3.6	1376	−7.9	+1.6	−9.4	1264	−6.25	+0.11	−6.36	456(29th)
2004	5-5	1297	22.4	24.0	−1.6	1385	−5.6	+0.8	−6.4	1340	−3.10	+0.60	−3.70	488(39th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.