← Back
CLASS 6A · District 7-6A

Richardson Pearce Mustangs

Enrollment: 2,340 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7
Rank
#177
was #177
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1228
#177 of 249
OVR Grade
72.5
#177 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Wylie (0-0) 1328
40% (-4)
2
McKinney Boyd (0-0) 1305
42% (-3)
3 13% (-18)
4
@Plano (0-0) 1471
27% (-10)
5
@#21Coppell (0-0) 2168
< 2% (-38)
7 13% (-18)
8
@Plano West (0-0) 1440
29% (-8)
9
Richardson (0-0) 1563
20% (-13)
10
@Plano East (0-0) 1352
37% (-5)
11 23% (-11)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 7-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 21
Cowboys
86.7
2168
0-0 0-0 6.6-0.4 > 98% D1
2 80
Wildcats
79.3
1681
0-0 0-0 4.5-2.5 86.4% D1
3 100
Eagles
77.6
1563
0-0 0-0 3.7-3.3 66.1% D2
4 110
Rams
76.8
1515
0-0 0-0 3.4-3.6 53.1% D2
5 128
Wildcats
76.2
1471
0-0 0-0 3.1-3.9 39.8%
6 136
Wolves
75.7
1440
0-0 0-0 2.9-4.1 31.9%
7 157
Panthers
74.4
1352
0-0 0-0 2.3-4.7 17%
8 177
Mustangs
72.5
1228
0-0 0-0 1.5-5.5 5.7%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Richardson Pearce’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004
8-2
Rating 555 (63rd)
#2 · 2024
9-3
Rating 553 (63rd)
#3 · 2018
7-4
Rating 547 (61st)
#4 · 2017
6-6
Rating 539 (58th)
#5 · 2005
7-3
Rating 523 (53rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 4-6 1005 24.2 32.3 −8.1 1259 −9.1 +9.6 −18.7 1033 −4.86 +0.10 −4.95 416(19th)
2024 9-3 1662 44.2 32.9 +11.3 1285 +11.9 +8.7 +3.2 1581 −0.75 +0.79 −1.54 553(63rd)
2023 6-4 1320 37.3 30.4 +6.9 1244 +4.0 +7.3 −3.2 1419 −2.30 +0.43 −2.73 501(44th)
2022 4-6 1205 26.8 32.7 −5.9 1369 −4.2 +7.8 −12.0 1199 −3.64 +0.10 −3.75 453(29th)
2021 3-7 1234 25.7 33.7 −8.0 1363 −5.1 +7.9 −13.0 1174 −5.14 +0.06 −5.21 448(27th)
2020 5-6 1404 41.9 33.6 +8.3 1343 +9.5 +9.1 +0.4 1510 −3.62 +0.15 −3.78 505(46th)
2019 5-6 1349 29.0 30.2 −1.2 1487 +1.9 +3.3 −1.4 1466 −3.02 +0.31 −3.33 499(44th)
2018 7-4 1552 38.1 30.8 +7.3 1430 +7.0 +2.8 +4.2 1605 −0.98 +1.18 −2.16 547(61st)
2017 6-6 1514 30.5 26.5 +4.0 1436 −0.5 −3.1 +2.6 1565 −3.02 +0.59 −3.60 539(58th)
2016 3-7 1081 33.8 45.6 −11.8 1377 +1.3 +19.3 −18.0 1050 −4.92 +0.15 −5.07 420(20th)
2015 3-7 1174 31.2 48.0 −16.8 1407 −0.2 +19.7 −20.0 1001 −5.24 +0.22 −5.46 421(20th)
2014 4-6 1380 23.8 40.2 −16.4 1473 −6.4 +10.8 −17.2 1069 −3.60 +0.69 −4.29 450(28th)
2013 5-6 1320 28.5 27.4 +1.1 1478 −2.7 −1.8 −0.9 1478 −2.73 +0.40 −3.13 501(44th)
2012 2-8 1133 29.9 41.3 −11.4 1482 −1.7 +10.8 −12.6 1186 −5.30 +0.04 −5.34 445(26th)
2011 1-1 1504 23.0 18.5 +4.5 1175 −12.0 −1.8 −10.2 1246 −0.64 +0.27 −0.90
2010 0-2 1462 36.5 39.5 −3.0 1554 +11.1 +14.0 −2.9 1427 −1.67 0.00 −1.67
2009 2-0 1581 46.0 24.5 +21.5 1344 +20.1 +0.4 +19.7 1993 +0.15 +0.15 0.00
2008 1-1 1484 27.5 21.0 +6.5 1144 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 1488 −0.93 +0.03 −0.96
2007 2-0 1648 32.0 12.0 +20.0 959 −4.7 −5.0 +0.3 1506 +0.05 +0.05 0.00
2006 2-0 1637 50.5 5.0 +45.5 906 +11.4 −6.0 +17.4 1936 +0.06 +0.06 0.00
2005 7-3 1613 27.7 23.1 +4.6 1266 −2.1 +1.7 −3.8 1406 −1.46 +0.46 −1.92 523(53rd)
2004 8-2 1646 28.7 18.4 +10.3 1339 +0.8 −3.0 +3.8 1596 −0.08 +1.38 −1.46 555(63rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.