← Back
CLASS 6A · District 7-6A

Richardson Berkner Rams

Enrollment: 2,303 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#97
was #116
Record
2-4
1-2 district
Elo
1624
#97 of 249
OVR Grade
78.5
#97 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
78.8
#87 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
79.4
#81 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1766
#81 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Euless Trinity (4-2) 1869
 19% (-14) L 17-28 1539 −2.3 −3.8 — −0.49
2
@Royse City (1-5) 1569
 33% (-7) W 37-30 1786 +9.7 −1.8 +0.31 —
3
@Lewisville Hebron (4-2) 1854
 42% (-3) L 23-24 1692 +1.1 −6.5 — −0.68
4
#21Coppell (5-1) 2214
 7% (-25) L 14-42 1673 +3.7 −3.3 — −0.19
5
@Richardson Lake Highlands (4-2) 1695
 41% (-4) L 28-31 1582 +2.7 −0.5 — −0.70
7
Plano West (2-4) 1342
 58% (+3) W 43-7 2321 +17.8 −15.0 +0.16 —
8
@Richardson (1-5) 1192
 86% (+17) — — — — — —
9
Plano East (4-2) 1678
 44% (-2) — — — — — —
10
Plano (2-4) 1451
 67% (+7) — — — — — —
11
@Richardson Pearce (0-6) 1004
 93% (+25) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 7-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 21
Cowboys
87.4
2214
 5-1 3-0 42.5 13.0 6.8-0.2 > 98% D1
2 86
Wildcats
79.6
1695
 4-2 3-0 30.5 26.5 5.5-1.5 > 98% D2
3 88
Panthers
79.3
1678
 4-2 2-1 32.2 18.7 4.3-2.7 87.2% D1
4 97
Rams
78.5
1624
 2-4 1-2 27.0 27.0 3.9-3.1 76.1% D2
5 133
Wildcats
75.9
1451
 2-4 2-1 22.2 28.5 3.5-3.5 33.9% —
6 157
Wolves
74.2
1342
 2-4 1-2 20.5 24.5 2.4-4.6 3.4% —
7 206
Mustangs
69.1
1004
 0-6 0-3 12.0 38.0 0.6-6.4 < 2% —
8 179
Eagles
72
1192
 1-5 0-3 20.8 40.5 1-6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Richardson Berkner’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2005
12-1
Rating 649 (87th)
#2 · 2006
9-4
Rating 600 (77th)
#3 · 2008
7-4
Rating 588 (74th)
#4 · 2004
8-4
Rating 582 (73rd)
#5 · 2009
6-5
Rating 562 (66th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-5 1421 27.4 21.2 +6.2 1349 −4.4 −5.8 +1.3 1534 −2.15 +0.66 −2.81 528(55th)
2024 5-5 1350 26.9 19.0 +7.9 1254 −8.2 −5.5 −2.7 1432 −3.24 +0.29 −3.53 501(45th)
2023 6-5 1464 32.3 23.5 +8.8 1393 +1.8 −3.7 +5.5 1637 −2.22 +0.64 −2.86 542(59th)
2022 5-6 1331 25.1 29.6 −4.5 1481 −3.6 +1.0 −4.6 1386 −2.79 +0.14 −2.93 489(40th)
2021 4-7 1069 24.2 29.8 −5.6 1240 −9.8 +6.3 −16.2 1096 −5.20 +0.19 −5.39 423(20th)
2020 2-8 740 13.5 37.5 −24.0 1209 −21.0 +15.1 −36.1 597 −6.58 +0.03 −6.61 322(5th)
2019 1-8 787 12.1 30.8 −18.7 1477 −14.6 +5.2 −19.8 1005 −5.82 +0.00 −5.82 387(12th)
2018 3-7 962 18.8 33.4 −14.6 1393 −13.7 +4.5 −18.2 1045 −4.86 +0.15 −5.01 409(17th)
2017 3-7 1082 22.2 29.8 −7.6 1357 −11.1 +2.0 −13.1 1173 −5.07 +0.05 −5.13 437(24th)
2016 5-5 1273 24.4 30.8 −6.4 1338 −8.3 +6.0 −14.4 1140 −2.87 +0.40 −3.27 449(28th)
2015 3-7 955 25.2 40.1 −14.9 1383 −7.9 +12.1 −19.9 1001 −5.00 +0.11 −5.11 402(15th)
2014 2-8 1051 23.1 37.1 −14.0 1419 −8.6 +9.7 −18.3 1043 −5.80 +0.19 −5.99 417(19th)
2013 4-6 1215 25.2 30.1 −4.9 1280 −7.5 +5.8 −13.3 1167 −3.66 +0.08 −3.74 449(28th)
2012 4-6 1322 31.1 38.0 −6.9 1399 −1.8 +9.0 −10.8 1230 −3.21 +0.10 −3.31 468(33rd)
2011 7-4 1645 25.5 19.3 +6.3 1510 −2.2 −9.0 +6.7 1669 −0.32 +1.00 −1.32 557(64th)
2010 4-6 1452 27.4 20.8 +6.6 1464 −0.7 −3.7 +3.0 1575 −3.25 +0.11 −3.36 528(55th)
2009 6-5 1591 28.4 17.2 +11.2 1413 0.0 −8.5 +8.5 1713 −1.59 +0.64 −2.23 562(66th)
2008 7-4 1584 25.7 11.1 +14.6 1446 −0.9 −12.4 +11.5 1788 −0.91 +1.20 −2.10 588(74th)
2007 3-7 1583 26.2 29.6 −3.4 1654 +2.9 −1.2 +4.2 1604 −3.24 +0.95 −4.19 546(61st)
2006 9-4 1823 27.6 23.0 +4.6 1658 +5.7 −5.9 +11.6 1789 +0.85 +2.56 −1.71 600(77th)
2005 12-1 1996 29.5 13.0 +16.5 1487 +3.6 −12.4 +15.9 1898 +2.31 +2.69 −0.38 649(87th)
2004 8-4 1806 22.2 19.0 +3.2 1535 −1.3 −6.8 +5.5 1637 −0.74 +1.58 −2.32 582(73rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.