← Back

CLASS 6A · District 7-6A

Richardson Berkner Rams

Enrollment: 2,303 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8

Rank

#110

was #110

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1515

#110 of 249

OVR Grade

76.8

#110 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Euless Trinity (0-0) 1856	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
2	@Royse City (0-0) 1686	33% (-7)	—	—	—	—
3	@Lewisville Hebron (0-0) 1750	27% (-9)	—	—	—	—
4	#21Coppell (0-0) 2168	6% (-26)	—	—	—	—
5	@Richardson Lake Highlands (0-0) 1681	33% (-7)	—	—	—	—
7	Plano West (0-0) 1440	58% (+3)	—	—	—	—
8	@Richardson (0-0) 1563	45% (-2)	—	—	—	—
9	Plano East (0-0) 1352	66% (+7)	—	—	—	—
10	Plano (0-0) 1471	55% (+2)	—	—	—	—
11	@Richardson Pearce (0-0) 1228	77% (+11)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 7-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		21	Coppell (3) Cowboys	86.7 2168	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D1
2		80	Richardson Lake Highlands (5) Wildcats	79.3 1681	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	86.4%	D1
3		100	Richardson (6) Eagles	77.6 1563	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	66.1%	D2
4		110	Richardson Berkner (8) Rams	76.8 1515	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	53.1%	D2
5		128	Plano (4) Wildcats	76.2 1471	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	39.8%	—
6		136	Plano West (1) Wolves	75.7 1440	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-4.1	31.9%	—
7		157	Plano East (2) Panthers	74.4 1352	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	17%	—
8		177	Richardson Pearce (7) Mustangs	72.5 1228	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.5-5.5	5.7%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Richardson Berkner’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2005

12-1

Rating 649 (87th)

#2 · 2006

9-4

Rating 600 (77th)

#3 · 2008

7-4

Rating 588 (74th)

#4 · 2004

8-4

Rating 582 (73rd)

#5 · 2009

6-5

Rating 562 (66th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	7-5	1421	27.4	21.2	+6.2	1349	−4.4	−5.8	+1.3	1534	−2.15	+0.66	−2.81	528(55th)
2024	5-5	1350	26.9	19.0	+7.9	1254	−8.2	−5.5	−2.7	1432	−3.24	+0.29	−3.53	501(45th)
2023	6-5	1464	32.3	23.5	+8.8	1393	+1.8	−3.7	+5.5	1637	−2.22	+0.64	−2.86	542(59th)
2022	5-6	1331	25.1	29.6	−4.5	1481	−3.6	+1.0	−4.6	1386	−2.79	+0.14	−2.93	489(40th)
2021	4-7	1069	24.2	29.8	−5.6	1240	−9.8	+6.3	−16.2	1096	−5.20	+0.19	−5.39	423(20th)
2020	2-8	740	13.5	37.5	−24.0	1209	−21.0	+15.1	−36.1	597	−6.58	+0.03	−6.61	322(5th)
2019	1-8	787	12.1	30.8	−18.7	1477	−14.6	+5.2	−19.8	1005	−5.82	+0.00	−5.82	387(12th)
2018	3-7	962	18.8	33.4	−14.6	1393	−13.7	+4.5	−18.2	1045	−4.86	+0.15	−5.01	409(17th)
2017	3-7	1082	22.2	29.8	−7.6	1357	−11.1	+2.0	−13.1	1173	−5.07	+0.05	−5.13	437(24th)
2016	5-5	1273	24.4	30.8	−6.4	1338	−8.3	+6.0	−14.4	1140	−2.87	+0.40	−3.27	449(28th)
2015	3-7	955	25.2	40.1	−14.9	1383	−7.9	+12.1	−19.9	1001	−5.00	+0.11	−5.11	402(15th)
2014	2-8	1051	23.1	37.1	−14.0	1419	−8.6	+9.7	−18.3	1043	−5.80	+0.19	−5.99	417(19th)
2013	4-6	1215	25.2	30.1	−4.9	1280	−7.5	+5.8	−13.3	1167	−3.66	+0.08	−3.74	449(28th)
2012	4-6	1322	31.1	38.0	−6.9	1399	−1.8	+9.0	−10.8	1230	−3.21	+0.10	−3.31	468(33rd)
2011	7-4	1645	25.5	19.3	+6.3	1510	−2.2	−9.0	+6.7	1669	−0.32	+1.00	−1.32	557(64th)
2010	4-6	1452	27.4	20.8	+6.6	1464	−0.7	−3.7	+3.0	1575	−3.25	+0.11	−3.36	528(55th)
2009	6-5	1591	28.4	17.2	+11.2	1413	0.0	−8.5	+8.5	1713	−1.59	+0.64	−2.23	562(66th)
2008	7-4	1584	25.7	11.1	+14.6	1446	−0.9	−12.4	+11.5	1788	−0.91	+1.20	−2.10	588(74th)
2007	3-7	1583	26.2	29.6	−3.4	1654	+2.9	−1.2	+4.2	1604	−3.24	+0.95	−4.19	546(61st)
2006	9-4	1823	27.6	23.0	+4.6	1658	+5.7	−5.9	+11.6	1789	+0.85	+2.56	−1.71	600(77th)
2005	12-1	1996	29.5	13.0	+16.5	1487	+3.6	−12.4	+15.9	1898	+2.31	+2.69	−0.38	649(87th)
2004	8-4	1806	22.2	19.0	+3.2	1535	−1.3	−6.8	+5.5	1637	−0.74	+1.58	−2.32	582(73rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.