| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Midland Lee (4-3) 1669 |
27% (-10) | L 33-41 | 1346 | +2.1 | +8.2 | — | −0.64 |
| 2 | Garland Sachse (6-0) 1785 |
30% (-8) | L 3-45 | 830 | −20.3 | +6.5 | — | −0.71 |
| 3 | @Mansfield (2-4) 1536 |
29% (-9) | L 28-31 | 1611 | −0.4 | −4.8 | — | −0.76 |
| 4 | Richardson Pearce (0-6) 1004 |
77% (+11) | W 21-9 | 1268 | −15.2 | −6.0 | +0.03 | — |
| 5 | @Richardson (1-5) 1192 |
59% (+4) | W 38-19 | 1536 | −0.9 | −2.4 | +0.09 | — |
| 7 | #21Coppell (5-1) 2214 |
4% (-30) | L 10-26 | 1973 | −0.3 | −19.3 | — | −0.18 |
| 8 | @Plano East (4-2) 1678 |
28% (-9) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Richardson Lake Highlands (4-2) 1695 |
26% (-10) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Richardson Berkner (2-4) 1624 |
33% (-7) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Plano West (2-4) 1342 |
61% (+4) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#133
was #134
Record
2-4
2-1 district
Elo
1451
#133 of 249
OVR Grade
75.9
#133 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
70.9
#168 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
77.5
#101 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1427
#136 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 7-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance


Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Plano’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2007
13-2
Rating 751 (97th)
#2 · 2005
13-1
Rating 719 (95th)
#3 · 2008
10-2
Rating 706 (94th)
#4 · 2013
7-4
Rating 660 (89th)
#5 · 2010
7-4
Rating 649 (87th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.






