← Back
CLASS 6A · District 19-6A

Pasadena Sam Rayburn Texans

Enrollment: 2,494 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#214
was #214
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
939
#214 of 249
OVR Grade
68.1
#214 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Aldine (0-0) 253
95% (+27)
2
Pasadena
89% (+20)
3
@Brazoswood (0-0) 1154
29% (-9)
4
Pasadena Dobie (0-0) 1430
11% (-20)
5
@Pearland Dawson (0-0) 1843
2% (-36)
6 38% (-5)
7
@#33Manvel (0-0) 1985
< 2% (-42)
8
Alvin (0-0) 976
46% (-1)
9
@#16Pearland (0-0) 2282
< 2% (-54)
11
#28Alvin Shadow Creek (0-0) 2095
< 2% (-46)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 19-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 16
Oilers
88.4
2282
0-0 0-0 7.3-0.7 > 98% D1
2 28
Sharks
85.6
2095
0-0 0-0 6.6-1.4 > 98% D2
3 33
Mavericks
83.9
1985
0-0 0-0 6.1-1.9 96.9% D2
4 56
Eagles
81.8
1843
0-0 0-0 5.5-2.5 90.3% D1
5 141
Longhorns
75.5
1430
0-0 0-0 3.7-4.3 12.4%
6 189
Buccaneers
71.4
1154
0-0 0-0 2.4-5.6 < 2%
7 202
Mavericks
69.8
1052
0-0 0-0 1.8-6.2 < 2%
8 208
Yellowjackets
68.7
976
0-0 0-0 1.5-6.5 < 2%
9 214
Texans
68.1
939
0-0 0-0 1.3-6.7 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Pasadena Sam Rayburn’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004
6-4
Rating 442 (25th)
#2 · 2006
4-6
Rating 428 (21st)
#3 · 2010
5-5
Rating 408 (17th)
#4 · 2011
4-6
Rating 404 (16th)
#5 · 2005
3-7
Rating 394 (14th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 4-6 919 17.3 31.7 −14.4 1224 −16.7 +8.6 −25.2 869 −3.63 +0.05 −3.68 387(12th)
2024 2-8 607 11.9 40.6 −28.7 1282 −23.0 +14.8 −37.8 554 −5.93 +0.01 −5.95 317(4th)
2023 2-8 567 15.6 46.9 −31.3 1074 −23.6 +25.6 −49.2 271 −7.06 +0.01 −7.07 279(2nd)
2022 3-7 767 20.3 38.4 −18.1 1045 −17.3 +19.9 −37.2 569 −6.26 +0.02 −6.28 330(5th)
2021 4-5 716 18.6 33.8 −15.2 895 −23.1 +15.1 −38.1 547 −4.27 +0.01 −4.29 318(4th)
2020 3-7 553 14.4 26.4 −12.0 961 −25.7 +9.8 −35.5 613 −6.10 +0.01 −6.11 308(3rd)
2019 0-10 285 4.9 61.6 −56.7 1302 −27.4 +36.5 −63.8 -96 −8.41 0.00 −8.41 195(0th)
2018 0-10 343 4.8 51.9 −47.1 1309 −28.1 +26.2 −54.4 140 −7.95 0.00 −7.95 232(0th)
2017 0-8 439 11.1 42.8 −31.6 1183 −22.8 +22.5 −45.3 367 −7.20 0.00 −7.20 271(1st)
2016 2-8 641 12.0 30.0 −18.0 1063 −24.7 +10.7 −35.4 615 −7.06 +0.02 −7.08 322(4th)
2015 0-10 402 12.2 46.1 −33.9 1397 −20.0 +18.6 −38.6 536 −7.46 0.00 −7.46 289(2nd)
2014 0-10 450 13.3 49.2 −35.9 1411 −18.4 +21.2 −39.6 510 −7.24 0.00 −7.24 292(2nd)
2013 1-9 545 14.1 47.3 −33.2 1278 −17.9 +24.8 −42.8 431 −7.47 +0.01 −7.48 291(2nd)
2012 4-6 962 17.1 38.3 −21.2 1245 −16.8 +14.3 −31.1 722 −4.49 +0.10 −4.59 368(9th)
2011 4-6 994 21.1 28.1 −7.0 1127 −14.1 +7.7 −21.8 955 −5.02 +0.06 −5.08 404(16th)
2010 5-5 1027 21.6 29.2 −7.6 1149 −12.2 +9.4 −21.6 959 −4.00 +0.08 −4.08 408(17th)
2009 2-8 879 15.5 31.6 −16.1 1315 −13.5 +11.6 −25.1 872 −6.24 +0.03 −6.27 382(12th)
2008 2-7 907 9.4 26.6 −17.1 1381 −18.7 +3.9 −22.7 933 −5.13 +0.03 −5.16 394(14th)
2007 2-8 757 12.0 32.9 −20.9 1258 −18.5 +12.4 −30.9 728 −6.44 +0.02 −6.45 354(8th)
2006 4-6 1028 17.2 22.3 −5.1 1241 −14.1 +2.2 −16.3 1092 −4.38 +0.10 −4.49 428(21st)
2005 3-7 921 13.4 27.7 −14.3 1303 −17.0 +7.0 −24.0 899 −4.97 +0.07 −5.04 394(14th)
2004 6-4 1205 21.9 25.0 −3.1 1191 −11.9 +6.0 −17.9 1052 −2.38 +0.17 −2.56 442(25th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.