← Back

CLASS 6A · District 19-6A

Pasadena Memorial Mavericks

Enrollment: 3,133 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#202

was #202

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1052

#202 of 249

OVR Grade

69.8

#202 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Clear Lake (0-0) 965	59% (+3)	—	—	—	—
2	@Beaumont United	26% (-10)	—	—	—	—
3	#33Manvel (0-0) 1985	< 2% (-37)	—	—	—	—
4	@Alvin (0-0) 976	58% (+3)	—	—	—	—
5	@#16Pearland (0-0) 2282	< 2% (-49)	—	—	—	—
6	@Pasadena Sam Rayburn (0-0) 939	62% (+5)	—	—	—	—
7	#28Alvin Shadow Creek (0-0) 2095	< 2% (-42)	—	—	—	—
8	@Brazoswood (0-0) 1154	39% (-4)	—	—	—	—
9	Pasadena Dobie (0-0) 1430	17% (-15)	—	—	—	—
10	@Pearland Dawson (0-0) 1843	4% (-32)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 19-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		16	Pearland (2) Oilers	88.4 2282	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		28	Alvin Shadow Creek (6) Sharks	85.6 2095	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-1.4	> 98%	D2
3		33	Manvel (9) Mavericks	83.9 1985	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.1-1.9	96.9%	D2
4		56	Pearland Dawson (5) Eagles	81.8 1843	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-2.5	90.3%	D1
5		141	Pasadena Dobie (1) Longhorns	75.5 1430	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-4.3	12.4%	—
6		189	Brazoswood (7) Buccaneers	71.4 1154	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.4-5.6	< 2%	—
7		202	Pasadena Memorial (3) Mavericks	69.8 1052	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.8-6.2	< 2%	—
8		208	Alvin (4) Yellowjackets	68.7 976	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.5-6.5	< 2%	—
9		214	Pasadena Sam Rayburn (8) Texans	68.1 939	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-6.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Pasadena Memorial’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2007

9-3

Rating 624 (83rd)

#2 · 2009

9-3

Rating 551 (62nd)

#3 · 2008

4-6

Rating 531 (55th)

#4 · 2012

8-3

Rating 530 (55th)

#5 · 2010

6-5

Rating 512 (49th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	3-7	1044	17.8	37.1	−19.3	1397	−12.8	+10.5	−23.3	917	−4.56	+0.09	−4.65	405(16th)
2024	3-7	1013	24.6	40.6	−16.0	1390	−8.1	+13.4	−21.5	964	−4.78	+0.18	−4.96	408(17th)
2023	5-6	1243	30.9	27.0	+3.9	1368	−1.8	+1.7	−3.6	1411	−3.84	+0.17	−4.01	492(41st)
2022	5-5	1161	32.4	33.5	−1.1	1190	−1.6	+12.3	−13.9	1153	−3.54	+0.17	−3.71	443(26th)
2021	3-7	885	19.8	33.8	−14.0	1209	−15.1	+10.5	−25.6	859	−5.33	+0.03	−5.36	375(10th)
2020	7-4	1308	28.0	24.4	+3.6	1140	−7.5	+2.8	−10.4	1241	−2.49	+0.20	−2.69	459(30th)
2019	4-6	1124	19.2	28.8	−9.6	1246	−14.9	+5.3	−20.2	995	−4.24	+0.07	−4.32	416(19th)
2018	3-7	1087	23.7	37.6	−13.9	1356	−9.0	+10.6	−19.6	1011	−4.43	+0.03	−4.46	415(18th)
2017	6-3	1436	34.2	27.7	+6.6	1205	+0.5	+7.6	−7.1	1322	−0.95	+0.27	−1.23	488(40th)
2016	6-4	1317	24.9	25.9	−1.0	1286	−6.3	+3.2	−9.5	1263	−1.41	+0.25	−1.66	470(33rd)
2015	3-7	1050	20.7	35.0	−14.3	1407	−9.5	+6.9	−16.5	1088	−4.33	+0.08	−4.41	422(20th)
2014	1-9	781	15.3	43.0	−27.7	1411	−15.6	+14.8	−30.3	742	−6.27	+0.00	−6.27	352(7th)
2013	4-7	1188	14.9	28.0	−13.1	1323	−17.8	+3.2	−21.0	975	−4.89	+0.10	−4.99	421(20th)
2012	8-3	1525	35.9	23.4	+12.5	1264	+2.7	+0.4	+2.3	1557	−0.81	+0.45	−1.26	530(55th)
2011	3-8	1084	24.9	34.6	−9.7	1441	−3.4	+9.2	−12.5	1187	−4.91	+0.12	−5.03	443(26th)
2010	6-5	1431	30.5	28.7	+1.8	1409	+2.4	+3.7	−1.3	1468	−2.90	+0.75	−3.65	512(49th)
2009	9-3	1652	30.9	18.8	+12.2	1332	+3.4	−1.3	+4.6	1616	−0.66	+1.48	−2.13	551(62nd)
2008	4-6	1562	33.7	30.1	+3.6	1453	+8.4	+7.8	+0.6	1516	−3.21	+0.69	−3.91	531(55th)
2007	9-3	1814	34.2	15.3	+18.8	1437	+8.3	−8.3	+16.6	1915	+0.32	+1.22	−0.90	624(83rd)
2006	6-5	1353	18.5	21.5	−3.1	1442	−7.3	−2.1	−5.2	1370	−2.62	+0.51	−3.13	494(42nd)
2005	6-4	1335	24.2	22.3	+1.9	1354	−3.1	−0.2	−2.9	1428	−1.84	+0.32	−2.15	502(45th)
2004	2-8	842	13.4	39.9	−26.5	1339	−16.3	+16.8	−33.1	672	−6.32	+0.03	−6.35	359(8th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.