← Back
CLASS 6A · District 19-6A

Pasadena Memorial Mavericks

Enrollment: 3,133 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#187
was #190
Record
3-4
2-3 district
Elo
1123
#187 of 249
OVR Grade
70.9
#187 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
71.3
#164 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
64.9
#212 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1072
#192 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Clear Lake (2-4) 1116
 59% (+3) W 44-31 1223 +0.6 +11.6 +0.02 —
2
@Beaumont United
 32% (-7) L 14-19 1213 −17.2 −5.8 — −0.91
3
#28Manvel (5-1) 2101
 < 2% (-43) L 0-75 445 −11.0 +31.2 — −0.21
4
@Alvin (0-6) 678
 84% (+16) W 43-41 804 −3.7 +24.1 +0.01 —
5
@#12Pearland (7-0) 2385
 < 2% (-49) L 0-49 1132 −11.4 +3.3 — −0.13
6
@Pasadena Sam Rayburn (1-6) 637
 86% (+17) W 58-21 1524 +13.2 +12.2 +0.01 —
7
#23Alvin Shadow Creek (5-1) 2203
 < 2% (-43) L 0-52 1161 −6.8 +6.7 — −0.19
8
@Brazoswood (3-3) 1292
 33% (-7) — — — — — —
9
Pasadena Dobie (2-4) 1248
 37% (-5) — — — — — —
10
@Pearland Dawson (3-4) 1551
 14% (-17) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 19-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 12
Oilers
90
2385
 7-0 5-0 47.6 9.9 7.7-0.3 > 98% D1
2 23
Sharks
87.2
2203
 5-1 4-0 42.7 8.5 6.9-1.1 > 98% D2
3 28
Mavericks
85.7
2101
 5-1 3-1 46.5 8.0 6.2-1.8 > 98% D2
4 109
Eagles
77.4
1551
 3-4 3-2 24.6 32.4 4.7-3.3 89% D1
5 170
Longhorns
72.8
1248
 2-4 1-3 17.3 33.0 2.8-5.2 4.7% —
6 187
Mavericks
70.9
1123
 3-4 2-3 22.7 41.1 2.8-5.2 3.8% —
7 165
Buccaneers
73.5
1292
 3-3 2-2 25.5 34.3 3.6-4.3 2.8% —
8 235
Yellowjackets
64.2
678
 0-6 0-4 17.5 48.0 0.7-7.3 < 2% —
9 237
Texans
63.6
637
 1-6 0-5 15.0 38.0 0.4-7.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Pasadena Memorial’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2007
9-3
Rating 624 (83rd)
#2 · 2009
9-3
Rating 551 (62nd)
#3 · 2008
4-6
Rating 531 (55th)
#4 · 2012
8-3
Rating 530 (55th)
#5 · 2010
6-5
Rating 512 (49th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 3-7 1044 17.8 37.1 −19.3 1397 −12.8 +10.5 −23.3 917 −4.56 +0.09 −4.65 405(16th)
2024 3-7 1013 24.6 40.6 −16.0 1390 −8.1 +13.4 −21.5 964 −4.78 +0.18 −4.96 408(17th)
2023 5-6 1243 30.9 27.0 +3.9 1368 −1.8 +1.7 −3.6 1411 −3.84 +0.17 −4.01 492(41st)
2022 5-5 1161 32.4 33.5 −1.1 1190 −1.6 +12.3 −13.9 1153 −3.54 +0.17 −3.71 443(26th)
2021 3-7 885 19.8 33.8 −14.0 1209 −15.1 +10.5 −25.6 859 −5.33 +0.03 −5.36 375(10th)
2020 7-4 1308 28.0 24.4 +3.6 1140 −7.5 +2.8 −10.4 1241 −2.49 +0.20 −2.69 459(30th)
2019 4-6 1124 19.2 28.8 −9.6 1246 −14.9 +5.3 −20.2 995 −4.24 +0.07 −4.32 416(19th)
2018 3-7 1087 23.7 37.6 −13.9 1356 −9.0 +10.6 −19.6 1011 −4.43 +0.03 −4.46 415(18th)
2017 6-3 1436 34.2 27.7 +6.6 1205 +0.5 +7.6 −7.1 1322 −0.95 +0.27 −1.23 488(40th)
2016 6-4 1317 24.9 25.9 −1.0 1286 −6.3 +3.2 −9.5 1263 −1.41 +0.25 −1.66 470(33rd)
2015 3-7 1050 20.7 35.0 −14.3 1407 −9.5 +6.9 −16.5 1088 −4.33 +0.08 −4.41 422(20th)
2014 1-9 781 15.3 43.0 −27.7 1411 −15.6 +14.8 −30.3 742 −6.27 +0.00 −6.27 352(7th)
2013 4-7 1188 14.9 28.0 −13.1 1323 −17.8 +3.2 −21.0 975 −4.89 +0.10 −4.99 421(20th)
2012 8-3 1525 35.9 23.4 +12.5 1264 +2.7 +0.4 +2.3 1557 −0.81 +0.45 −1.26 530(55th)
2011 3-8 1084 24.9 34.6 −9.7 1441 −3.4 +9.2 −12.5 1187 −4.91 +0.12 −5.03 443(26th)
2010 6-5 1431 30.5 28.7 +1.8 1409 +2.4 +3.7 −1.3 1468 −2.90 +0.75 −3.65 512(49th)
2009 9-3 1652 30.9 18.8 +12.2 1332 +3.4 −1.3 +4.6 1616 −0.66 +1.48 −2.13 551(62nd)
2008 4-6 1562 33.7 30.1 +3.6 1453 +8.4 +7.8 +0.6 1516 −3.21 +0.69 −3.91 531(55th)
2007 9-3 1814 34.2 15.3 +18.8 1437 +8.3 −8.3 +16.6 1915 +0.32 +1.22 −0.90 624(83rd)
2006 6-5 1353 18.5 21.5 −3.1 1442 −7.3 −2.1 −5.2 1370 −2.62 +0.51 −3.13 494(42nd)
2005 6-4 1335 24.2 22.3 +1.9 1354 −3.1 −0.2 −2.9 1428 −1.84 +0.32 −2.15 502(45th)
2004 2-8 842 13.4 39.9 −26.5 1339 −16.3 +16.8 −33.1 672 −6.32 +0.03 −6.35 359(8th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.