← Back
CLASS 6A · District 19-6A

Pasadena Dobie Longhorns

Enrollment: 3,642 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#170
was #169
Record
2-4
1-3 district
Elo
1248
#170 of 249
OVR Grade
72.8
#170 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
69.4
#182 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
71.7
#162 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1204
#169 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Clear Springs (2-4) 1518
 33% (-7) W 17-15 1387 −10.9 −6.3 +0.25 —
2
@Alief Taylor (6-1) 1457
 66% (+6) L 30-47 1177 +4.2 +17.1 — −0.90
3
#12Pearland (7-0) 2385
 < 2% (-39) L 10-49 1382 −1.4 +3.3 — −0.13
4
@Pasadena Sam Rayburn (1-6) 637
 94% (+26) W 42-7 1474 −2.8 −1.8 +0.01 —
5
#23Alvin Shadow Creek (5-1) 2203
 3% (-33) L 2-67 836 −4.8 +21.7 — −0.20
6
@Brazoswood (3-3) 1292
 55% (+2) L 3-13 967 −32.2 −10.9 — −0.91
8
Pearland Dawson (3-4) 1551
 22% (-12) — — — — — —
9
@Pasadena Memorial (3-4) 1123
 63% (+5) — — — — — —
10
#28Manvel (5-1) 2101
 3% (-34) — — — — — —
11
@Alvin (0-6) 678
 92% (+23) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 19-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 12
Oilers
90
2385
 7-0 5-0 47.6 9.9 7.7-0.3 > 98% D1
2 23
Sharks
87.2
2203
 5-1 4-0 42.7 8.5 6.9-1.1 > 98% D2
3 28
Mavericks
85.7
2101
 5-1 3-1 46.5 8.0 6.2-1.8 > 98% D2
4 109
Eagles
77.4
1551
 3-4 3-2 24.6 32.4 4.7-3.3 89% D1
5 170
Longhorns
72.8
1248
 2-4 1-3 17.3 33.0 2.8-5.2 4.7% —
6 187
Mavericks
70.9
1123
 3-4 2-3 22.7 41.1 2.8-5.2 3.8% —
7 165
Buccaneers
73.5
1292
 3-3 2-2 25.5 34.3 3.6-4.3 2.8% —
8 235
Yellowjackets
64.2
678
 0-6 0-4 17.5 48.0 0.7-7.3 < 2% —
9 237
Texans
63.6
637
 1-6 0-5 15.0 38.0 0.4-7.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Pasadena Dobie’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004
10-3
Rating 621 (82nd)
#2 · 2020
9-1
Rating 608 (80th)
#3 · 2021
8-3
Rating 587 (74th)
#4 · 2005
8-2
Rating 574 (70th)
#5 · 2019
8-2
Rating 567 (68th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-5 1409 32.4 27.0 +5.4 1381 0.0 −0.7 +0.8 1519 −2.15 +0.13 −2.28 517(51st)
2024 6-5 1657 38.7 38.5 +0.3 1429 +6.6 +8.9 −2.3 1441 −1.70 +0.52 −2.22 531(55th)
2023 8-3 1625 37.5 29.4 +8.2 1453 +7.4 +0.4 +7.0 1675 +0.13 +0.88 −0.75 561(66th)
2022 4-7 1203 23.9 29.9 −6.0 1480 −5.6 +3.0 −8.6 1286 −3.81 +0.14 −3.96 465(32nd)
2021 8-3 1675 49.9 22.8 +27.1 1289 +15.9 −0.8 +16.7 1917 −0.75 +0.30 −1.04 587(74th)
2020 9-1 1856 48.4 16.4 +32.0 1157 +13.5 −3.9 +17.4 1935 +0.64 +0.75 −0.11 608(80th)
2019 8-2 1705 32.5 18.7 +13.8 1410 +0.1 −9.1 +9.2 1730 +0.46 +0.64 −0.18 567(68th)
2018 6-4 1445 37.5 28.8 +8.7 1409 +5.8 +1.4 +4.5 1612 −1.09 +0.41 −1.50 527(54th)
2017 2-6 929 14.9 33.5 −18.6 1172 −17.7 +13.8 −31.5 712 −5.17 +0.01 −5.18 362(9th)
2016 3-7 1127 23.0 25.5 −2.5 1379 −7.9 0.0 −7.9 1303 −5.22 +0.19 −5.42 458(30th)
2015 5-6 1519 29.5 34.0 −4.5 1513 +0.7 +3.6 −2.9 1428 −2.30 +0.20 −2.50 510(48th)
2014 6-5 1512 28.7 28.4 +0.4 1467 −1.9 −0.4 −1.5 1463 −1.44 +0.60 −2.04 514(50th)
2013 5-6 1283 22.1 24.2 −2.1 1478 −6.7 −2.7 −4.0 1400 −3.19 +0.12 −3.31 486(39th)
2012 5-6 1314 18.7 27.0 −8.3 1401 −12.2 −0.8 −11.4 1216 −3.56 +0.58 −4.14 466(32nd)
2011 7-4 1494 32.8 23.5 +9.4 1323 +2.5 −1.0 +3.5 1588 −1.83 +0.71 −2.54 534(56th)
2010 7-3 1659 30.4 18.4 +12.0 1316 +0.9 −5.1 +6.0 1650 −1.17 +0.78 −1.95 558(65th)
2009 4-6 1178 16.5 21.7 −5.2 1342 −10.7 +1.3 −12.0 1199 −4.32 +0.07 −4.39 452(28th)
2008 4-5 1155 13.3 22.9 −9.6 1412 −12.9 +0.7 −13.6 1159 −2.90 +0.58 −3.48 446(27th)
2007 2-8 1100 13.0 32.7 −19.7 1506 −12.2 +7.0 −19.2 1020 −5.64 +0.06 −5.70 424(21st)
2006 4-6 1413 28.7 32.1 −3.4 1430 +3.4 +9.2 −5.8 1355 −3.86 +0.23 −4.09 498(43rd)
2005 8-2 1770 31.2 19.6 +11.6 1391 +4.8 −2.3 +7.1 1678 −0.18 +0.76 −0.93 574(70th)
2004 10-3 1869 26.8 13.8 +13.1 1454 +0.6 −10.1 +10.8 1769 +0.59 +1.74 −1.16 621(82nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.