← Back

CLASS 6A · District 2-6A

Odessa Bronchos

Enrollment: 4,273 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2

Rank

#223

was #223

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

887

#223 of 249

OVR Grade

67.4

#223 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	MX Academy (Mex)	92% (+23)	—	—	—	—
2	El Paso Coronado (0-0) 877	51% (+0)	—	—	—	—
3	@#27San Antonio Johnson (0-0) 2140	< 2% (-50)	—	—	—	—
4	@Abilene Cooper	9% (-23)	—	—	—	—
5	San Benito (0-0) 1261	17% (-15)	—	—	—	—
6	Chandler Compass (AZ)	5% (-29)	—	—	—	—
7	Midland (0-0) 1378	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
8	@Odessa Permian (0-0) 1752	3% (-35)	—	—	—	—
9	San Angelo Central (0-0) 1528	6% (-26)	—	—	—	—
10	@Midland Lee (0-0) 1713	3% (-33)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 2-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		66	Odessa Permian (1) Panthers	80.4 1752	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-0.9	> 98%	D1
2		71	Midland Lee (3) Rebels	79.8 1713	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3		104	San Angelo Central (5) Bobcats	77 1528	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.2-1.8	97.4%	D2
4		149	Midland (4) Bulldogs	74.8 1378	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.6-2.4	91.8%	D2
5		223	Odessa (2) Bronchos	67.4 887	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-3.8	11.8%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Odessa’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2008

9-3

Rating 600 (77th)

#2 · 2009

9-3

Rating 582 (73rd)

#3 · 2010

5-6

Rating 562 (66th)

#4 · 2013

6-6

Rating 531 (56th)

#5 · 2005

7-3

Rating 528 (55th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	0-10	803	18.6	46.7	−28.1	1517	−12.2	+16.8	−29.1	773	−8.15	0.00	−8.15	364(9th)
2024	2-7	1040	30.3	52.3	−22.0	1442	−4.1	+19.9	−24.1	898	−5.04	+0.23	−5.26	402(15th)
2023	5-5	1288	36.9	43.8	−6.9	1467	+5.8	+13.1	−7.4	1316	−2.37	+0.65	−3.03	483(38th)
2022	3-7	1208	31.2	42.6	−11.4	1552	+2.2	+11.1	−8.9	1277	−4.07	+0.40	−4.47	464(31st)
2021	3-7	1265	31.7	39.5	−7.8	1573	+4.1	+9.0	−4.9	1378	−4.02	+0.71	−4.73	478(36th)
2020	0-7	914	7.4	38.7	−31.3	1645	−21.9	+4.6	−26.4	839	−4.71	0.00	−4.71	—
2019	2-8	1061	19.1	40.2	−21.1	1631	−10.8	+9.9	−20.6	984	−5.38	+0.28	−5.66	409(17th)
2018	5-5	1385	31.3	24.3	+7.0	1523	−0.7	−3.8	+3.1	1578	−2.33	+0.66	−2.99	518(51st)
2017	3-7	1270	21.2	27.2	−6.0	1597	−7.2	−4.2	−3.0	1425	−3.16	+0.74	−3.90	487(39th)
2016	0-10	936	9.3	49.4	−40.1	1735	−16.7	+12.3	−29.0	775	−6.01	0.00	−6.01	372(10th)
2015	2-8	1291	23.1	39.4	−16.3	1695	−0.5	+6.3	−6.8	1330	−4.25	+0.54	−4.78	476(35th)
2014	4-6	1541	21.1	25.9	−4.8	1634	−5.6	−6.5	+0.9	1523	−3.04	+0.88	−3.92	525(54th)
2013	6-6	1619	28.5	34.9	−6.4	1574	−2.1	+1.1	−3.2	1421	−2.41	+0.96	−3.37	531(56th)
2012	1-9	1099	9.1	40.0	−30.9	1586	−15.9	+11.7	−27.6	810	−5.94	+0.05	−5.98	391(13th)
2011	2-8	1445	18.8	33.8	−15.0	1705	−4.2	+2.7	−6.9	1328	−4.30	+0.86	−5.16	494(42nd)
2010	5-6	1773	28.2	33.0	−4.8	1725	+4.4	0.0	+4.4	1610	−1.29	+0.95	−2.24	562(66th)
2009	9-3	1787	32.6	20.1	+12.5	1467	+5.2	−5.2	+10.5	1762	−0.09	+1.86	−1.95	582(73rd)
2008	9-3	1818	37.5	26.0	+11.5	1483	+8.8	−2.5	+11.3	1782	+0.59	+2.05	−1.46	600(77th)
2007	2-8	1057	16.4	25.5	−9.1	1583	−7.3	−1.9	−5.4	1365	−5.34	+0.33	−5.67	467(32nd)
2006	2-8	1209	23.5	29.3	−5.8	1434	−4.6	+3.7	−8.3	1292	−6.29	+0.17	−6.46	471(34th)
2005	7-3	1558	23.2	20.3	+2.9	1442	−4.7	−3.8	−0.9	1478	−0.39	+0.72	−1.12	528(55th)
2004	4-6	1224	19.3	38.0	−18.7	1499	−6.1	+8.1	−14.2	1146	−3.81	+0.40	−4.22	455(29th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.