← Back
CLASS 6A · District 4-6A

Northwest Eaton Eagles

Enrollment: 3,238 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#130
was #131
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1456
#130 of 249
OVR Grade
75.9
#130 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Denton Ryan
16% (-16)
2
@Arlington (0-0) 1475
48% (-1)
3 50% (+0)
4
@#30Byron Nelson (0-0) 2077
7% (-25)
5
@#9Southlake Carroll (0-0) 2444
< 2% (-40)
7
Keller Central (0-0) 1456
50% (0)
8 58% (+3)
9 48% (-1)
10
Justin Northwest (0-0) 1333
63% (+5)
11
@Keller (0-0) 1583
37% (-5)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 4-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 9
Dragons
90.9
2444
0-0 0-0 6.7-0.3 > 98% D2
2 30
Bobcats
85.3
2077
0-0 0-0 5.8-1.2 > 98% D1
3 98
Indians
77.9
1583
0-0 0-0 3.5-3.5 66.1% D1
4 123
Falcons
76.3
1477
0-0 0-0 2.8-4.2 39% D2
5 130
Chargers
75.9
1456
0-0 0-0 2.6-4.4 32.7%
6 130
Eagles
75.9
1456
0-0 0-0 2.6-4.4 31.7%
7 150
Pioneers
74.7
1376
0-0 0-0 2.1-4.9 17.9%
8 158
Texans
74.1
1333
0-0 0-0 1.9-5.1 12.8%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Northwest Eaton’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021
8-3
Rating 608 (80th)
#2 · 2020
9-4
Rating 602 (78th)
#3 · 2024
4-6
Rating 547 (61st)
#4 · 2018
5-5
Rating 536 (57th)
#5 · 2023
4-6
Rating 533 (56th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 3-7 1400 25.2 32.5 −7.3 1695 +1.2 +0.2 +1.0 1525 −3.33 +0.35 −3.68 517(51st)
2024 4-6 1579 28.0 31.5 −3.5 1718 +3.5 −1.3 +4.8 1620 −1.47 +0.60 −2.07 547(61st)
2023 4-6 1415 33.1 31.6 +1.5 1544 +4.8 +1.0 +3.9 1597 −2.94 +0.39 −3.33 533(56th)
2022 4-6 1558 28.9 34.9 −6.0 1604 0.0 +1.8 −1.7 1456 −2.52 +0.40 −2.92 519(52nd)
2021 8-3 1876 36.0 24.6 +11.4 1618 +8.9 −8.7 +17.5 1938 +0.17 +1.65 −1.48 608(80th)
2020 9-4 1900 32.4 18.9 +13.5 1597 +5.0 −11.2 +16.2 1906 +0.09 +1.67 −1.58 602(78th)
2019 4-6 1443 19.7 23.2 −3.5 1722 −1.7 −6.7 +4.9 1623 −2.50 +0.59 −3.09 528(55th)
2018 5-5 1536 19.2 21.5 −2.3 1660 −3.7 −8.2 +4.5 1614 −0.99 +1.61 −2.60 536(57th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.