← Back

CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

North Garland Raiders

Enrollment: 2,903 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2

Rank

#197

was #197

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1096

#197 of 249

OVR Grade

70.5

#197 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Princeton (0-0) 1131	46% (-1)	—	—	—	—
2	@Grand Prairie (0-0) 766	80% (+13)	—	—	—	—
3	Denton	34% (-6)	—	—	—	—
4	Wylie East (0-0) 1679	8% (-23)	—	—	—	—
5	@South Garland (0-0) 506	92% (+24)	—	—	—	—
7	@Garland (0-0) 1259	34% (-7)	—	—	—	—
8	Garland Sachse (0-0) 1529	14% (-17)	—	—	—	—
9	@Wylie (0-0) 1328	27% (-9)	—	—	—	—
10	Garland Lakeview Centennial (0-0) 1510	15% (-17)	—	—	—	—
11	Garland Rowlett (0-0) 1534	14% (-18)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		82	Wylie East (4) Raiders	79.3 1679	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-1.5	94.9%	D1
2		102	Garland Rowlett (7) Eagles	77.1 1534	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	83.1%	D2
3		103	Garland Sachse (3) Mustangs	77 1529	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	82%	D1
4		112	Garland Lakeview Centennial (6) Patriots	76.8 1510	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	78.5%	D2
5		162	Wylie (1) Pirates	74 1328	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	34.4%	—
6		172	Garland (5) Owls	73 1259	0-0	0-0	—	—	3-4	22.4%	—
7		197	North Garland (2) Raiders	70.5 1096	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	4.7%	—
8		246	South Garland (8) Titans	61.6 506	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how North Garland’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004

7-4

Rating 571 (69th)

#2 · 2005

4-6

Rating 558 (65th)

#3 · 2009

6-5

Rating 558 (65th)

#4 · 2006

5-5

Rating 547 (61st)

#5 · 2019

6-4

Rating 497 (43rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	956	18.1	31.9	−13.8	1248	−13.2	+10.4	−23.6	909	−6.48	+0.10	−6.58	396(14th)
2024	0-10	739	15.9	45.6	−29.7	1413	−13.0	+21.2	−34.2	645	−7.99	0.00	−7.99	341(6th)
2023	2-8	1063	21.3	38.8	−17.5	1296	−10.5	+14.8	−25.4	866	−6.47	+0.05	−6.52	404(15th)
2022	3-7	1119	32.4	37.1	−4.7	1305	+1.3	+14.4	−13.1	1173	−5.46	+0.32	−5.78	442(25th)
2021	6-5	1213	27.5	30.4	−2.9	1281	−7.0	+5.3	−12.4	1191	−2.64	+0.32	−2.97	449(27th)
2020	1-5	885	11.2	34.3	−23.2	1181	−21.3	+13.0	−34.3	644	−4.11	+0.01	−4.12	—
2019	6-4	1276	36.9	22.2	+14.7	1168	+1.9	+2.1	−0.2	1495	−2.80	+0.21	−3.01	497(43rd)
2018	6-4	1283	23.2	16.4	+6.8	1225	−9.2	−5.1	−4.1	1398	−2.34	+0.34	−2.68	491(41st)
2017	3-7	1058	24.3	35.2	−10.9	1315	−7.8	+11.0	−18.8	1030	−5.20	+0.10	−5.30	415(18th)
2016	2-8	846	8.9	22.2	−13.3	1371	−21.7	−2.6	−19.1	1022	−5.92	+0.16	−6.08	396(14th)
2015	3-6	931	19.1	33.7	−14.6	1504	−14.3	+0.4	−14.6	1134	−3.45	+0.11	−3.56	417(19th)
2014	0-10	573	11.8	38.8	−27.0	1469	−21.6	+6.8	−28.4	791	−7.50	0.00	−7.50	340(6th)
2013	0-10	612	6.8	38.6	−31.8	1367	−24.0	+13.7	−37.7	556	−8.35	0.00	−8.35	313(4th)
2012	1-9	810	15.5	42.4	−26.9	1389	−15.9	+15.1	−31.0	725	−6.95	+0.03	−6.97	354(8th)
2011	0-9	907	8.6	43.7	−35.1	1609	−15.8	+14.1	−30.0	750	−6.31	0.00	−6.31	369(9th)
2010	1-9	1211	12.0	27.0	−15.0	1583	−11.2	−1.0	−10.3	1243	−6.32	+0.10	−6.42	463(31st)
2009	6-5	1585	22.2	15.7	+6.5	1485	−2.5	−8.8	+6.3	1658	−2.15	+1.04	−3.20	558(65th)
2008	5-5	1360	22.9	27.3	−4.4	1393	−5.4	+2.5	−7.9	1302	−2.83	+0.26	−3.09	484(38th)
2007	1-9	1262	17.5	30.9	−13.4	1589	−6.5	+1.8	−8.2	1294	−6.52	+0.05	−6.57	476(35th)
2006	5-5	1573	33.0	29.0	+4.0	1499	+6.8	+2.0	+4.8	1620	−1.87	+0.83	−2.70	547(61st)
2005	4-6	1519	23.5	17.9	+5.6	1566	+1.0	−7.5	+8.5	1712	−3.41	+0.37	−3.77	558(65th)
2004	7-4	1668	27.6	21.6	+6.0	1557	+4.7	−3.6	+8.2	1706	−0.90	+0.93	−1.83	571(69th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.