← Back

CLASS 6A · District 6-6A

McKinney Lions

Enrollment: 2,549 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#116

was #116

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1488

#116 of 249

OVR Grade

76.4

#116 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@McKinney North	69% (+8)	—	—	—	—
2	Forney (0-0) 1808	21% (-13)	—	—	—	—
3	@Little Elm (0-0) 1150	80% (+14)	—	—	—	—
4	@#50Prosper Walnut Grove (0-0) 1890	16% (-16)	—	—	—	—
5	#24Prosper (0-0) 2154	6% (-27)	—	—	—	—
7	@#6Allen (0-0) 2516	< 2% (-41)	—	—	—	—
8	@Princeton (0-0) 1131	82% (+14)	—	—	—	—
9	Prosper Rock Hill (0-0) 1453	54% (+1)	—	—	—	—
10	@Dallas Jesuit (0-0) 1511	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—
11	McKinney Boyd (0-0) 1305	68% (+7)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 6-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		6	Allen (1) Eagles	91.9 2516	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D1
2		24	Prosper (3) Eagles	86.5 2154	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.7-1.3	> 98%	D1
3		50	Prosper Walnut Grove (7) Wildcats	82.5 1890	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	94.8%	D2
4		111	Dallas Jesuit (8) Rangers	76.8 1511	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-4.1	41.9%	D2
5		116	McKinney (5) Lions	76.4 1488	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	30.4%	—
6		132	Prosper Rock Hill (6) Blue Hawks	75.9 1453	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.4	23.7%	—
7		165	McKinney Boyd (4) Broncos	73.7 1305	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.8-5.2	7.8%	—
8		193	Princeton (2) Panthers	71 1131	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how McKinney’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2022

8-5

Rating 680 (92nd)

#2 · 2023

9-3

Rating 647 (87th)

#3 · 2021

3-6

Rating 586 (74th)

#4 · 2017

7-4

Rating 572 (70th)

#5 · 2019

7-5

Rating 566 (67th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	3-7	1297	16.0	30.0	−14.0	1644	−8.7	−1.5	−7.1	1321	−3.54	+0.31	−3.85	481(37th)
2024	6-5	1622	26.8	23.5	+3.4	1581	−0.3	−7.6	+7.2	1681	−1.44	+0.59	−2.04	558(65th)
2023	9-3	2020	30.9	19.1	+11.8	1686	+5.8	−13.8	+19.6	1991	+1.91	+2.85	−0.94	647(87th)
2022	8-5	2086	38.5	26.9	+11.5	1844	+15.5	−9.9	+25.3	2134	+1.75	+2.31	−0.56	680(92nd)
2021	3-6	1642	23.1	30.1	−7.0	1924	+1.4	−9.8	+11.3	1782	−1.29	+0.51	−1.80	586(74th)
2020	5-5	1674	22.9	27.0	−4.1	1788	−1.7	−8.9	+7.2	1679	−0.61	+0.76	−1.38	558(65th)
2019	7-5	1734	30.2	28.5	+1.7	1668	+5.8	−2.4	+8.2	1706	−0.34	+1.36	−1.70	566(67th)
2018	4-7	1521	21.1	29.0	−7.9	1643	−5.4	−4.0	−1.4	1466	−3.63	+0.72	−4.35	515(50th)
2017	7-4	1677	30.3	30.2	+0.1	1766	+6.6	−3.6	+10.2	1754	+0.42	+1.64	−1.22	572(70th)
2016	4-6	1269	26.5	39.9	−13.4	1661	+0.3	+6.8	−6.6	1336	−2.27	+0.94	−3.20	475(35th)
2015	0-1	1334	28.0	45.0	−17.0	1174	−18.8	+17.2	−36.0	599	−0.88	0.00	−0.88	—
2014	1-0	1450	26.0	21.0	+5.0	1380	−12.7	−2.7	−9.9	1252	+0.10	+0.10	0.00	—
2013	3-6	1393	19.2	29.4	−10.2	1723	−3.4	−1.4	−2.0	1450	−2.17	+0.08	−2.25	504(46th)
2012	5-5	1474	32.7	36.4	−3.7	1574	+5.5	+6.3	−0.8	1480	−1.62	+0.90	−2.52	515(50th)
2011	0-1	1043	28.0	38.0	−10.0	1890	+9.2	+4.5	+4.7	1617	−0.52	0.00	−0.52	—
2010	0-1	1023	33.0	57.0	−24.0	1949	+13.9	+22.0	−8.1	1298	−0.81	0.00	−0.81	—
2009	0-2	1024	38.5	67.0	−28.5	1421	+6.8	+36.1	−29.3	767	−1.79	0.00	−1.79	—
2008	0-2	1191	35.0	44.5	−9.5	1175	+3.8	+18.4	−14.6	1134	−1.80	0.00	−1.80	—
2007	2-0	1342	27.0	14.0	+13.0	911	−7.4	−2.0	−5.4	1364	+0.06	+0.06	0.00	—
2006	1-1	1270	22.5	21.0	+1.5	1008	−16.3	+4.6	−20.9	978	−0.88	+0.03	−0.91	—
2005	0-1	1280	9.0	23.0	−14.0	1191	−24.0	−2.4	−21.6	959	−0.98	0.00	−0.98	—
2004	1-0	1515	8.0	5.0	+3.0	944	−26.0	−15.3	−10.7	1233	+0.05	+0.05	0.00	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.