← Back

CLASS 6A · District 6-6A

McKinney Boyd Broncos

Enrollment: 2,599 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#165

was #165

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1305

#165 of 249

OVR Grade

73.7

#165 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Flower Mound (0-0) 1430	37% (-5)	—	—	—	—
2	@Richardson Pearce (0-0) 1228	58% (+3)	—	—	—	—
3	@Keller (0-0) 1583	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
4	Prosper Rock Hill (0-0) 1453	35% (-6)	—	—	—	—
5	@Dallas Jesuit (0-0) 1511	30% (-8)	—	—	—	—
7	Princeton (0-0) 1131	67% (+7)	—	—	—	—
8	#50Prosper Walnut Grove (0-0) 1890	8% (-23)	—	—	—	—
9	@#24Prosper (0-0) 2154	3% (-34)	—	—	—	—
10	#6Allen (0-0) 2516	< 2% (-48)	—	—	—	—
11	@McKinney (0-0) 1488	32% (-7)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 6-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		6	Allen (1) Eagles	91.9 2516	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D1
2		24	Prosper (3) Eagles	86.5 2154	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.7-1.3	> 98%	D1
3		50	Prosper Walnut Grove (7) Wildcats	82.5 1890	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	94.8%	D2
4		111	Dallas Jesuit (8) Rangers	76.8 1511	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-4.1	41.9%	D2
5		116	McKinney (5) Lions	76.4 1488	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	30.4%	—
6		132	Prosper Rock Hill (6) Blue Hawks	75.9 1453	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.4	23.7%	—
7		165	McKinney Boyd (4) Broncos	73.7 1305	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.8-5.2	7.8%	—
8		193	Princeton (2) Panthers	71 1131	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how McKinney Boyd’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2014

8-4

Rating 683 (92nd)

#2 · 2013

7-5

Rating 655 (88th)

#3 · 2021

8-3

Rating 649 (87th)

#4 · 2012

6-5

Rating 624 (83rd)

#5 · 2010

9-3

Rating 620 (82nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-9	1059	20.8	33.6	−12.8	1655	−4.8	+3.4	−8.2	1295	−5.76	+0.02	−5.79	456(29th)
2024	3-7	1267	28.2	34.3	−6.1	1539	+0.2	+4.3	−4.0	1399	−3.60	+0.10	−3.70	489(40th)
2023	1-9	1125	16.1	46.2	−30.1	1679	−9.6	+12.5	−22.1	948	−4.73	+0.04	−4.77	420(19th)
2022	2-8	1491	21.4	39.5	−18.1	1928	+0.6	−0.2	+0.8	1521	−3.04	+0.22	−3.27	542(59th)
2021	8-3	2020	29.1	22.9	+6.2	1899	+6.2	−14.4	+20.6	2015	+2.20	+2.62	−0.42	649(87th)
2020	4-7	1640	18.2	23.1	−4.9	1867	−5.7	−15.0	+9.3	1732	−2.18	+0.75	−2.93	570(69th)
2019	3-7	1519	18.8	22.0	−3.2	1751	−4.8	−11.7	+6.9	1671	−3.57	+0.55	−4.12	545(60th)
2018	2-8	1368	25.6	38.4	−12.8	1712	+1.2	+5.6	−4.4	1391	−4.25	+0.44	−4.70	491(41st)
2017	5-5	1652	18.4	25.4	−7.0	1835	−4.6	−11.0	+6.4	1660	−0.48	+1.28	−1.76	565(67th)
2016	2-8	1487	17.2	40.2	−23.0	1800	−6.2	+3.5	−9.7	1257	−3.81	+0.27	−4.08	492(41st)
2015	5-5	1843	27.2	31.0	−3.8	1857	+6.9	−4.2	+11.1	1778	+0.17	+2.30	−2.13	599(77th)
2014	8-4	2153	31.2	24.4	+6.8	1937	+9.6	−14.5	+24.0	2100	+2.62	+3.27	−0.65	683(92nd)
2013	7-5	2005	30.3	24.4	+5.9	1887	+10.5	−11.9	+22.4	2059	+1.13	+2.45	−1.32	655(88th)
2012	6-5	1797	27.8	25.0	+2.8	1889	+6.1	−12.1	+18.3	1956	−0.08	+1.95	−2.03	624(83rd)
2011	8-3	1890	32.8	18.6	+14.2	1507	+4.7	−9.9	+14.6	1865	−0.15	+1.05	−1.20	607(79th)
2010	9-3	1949	34.3	19.2	+15.1	1508	+8.0	−8.0	+16.0	1899	+0.66	+1.93	−1.27	620(82nd)
2009	4-6	1483	35.6	39.9	−4.3	1684	+10.5	+8.3	+2.1	1554	−1.38	+0.95	−2.33	527(54th)
2008	2-7	1228	20.8	38.1	−17.3	1888	−1.1	+2.4	−3.5	1413	−2.95	+0.24	−3.19	503(45th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.