← Back

CLASS 6A · District 11-6A

Mansfield Tigers

Enrollment: 2,638 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#137

was #137

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1434

#137 of 249

OVR Grade

75.6

#137 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Arlington Martin (0-0) 1633	30% (-8)	—	—	—	—
2	@Mansfield Summit	25% (-11)	—	—	—	—
3	Plano (0-0) 1471	46% (-1)	—	—	—	—
4	Red Oak (0-0) 1605	33% (-7)	—	—	—	—
5	@Mansfield Lake Ridge (0-0) 1850	15% (-17)	—	—	—	—
7	@#2Duncanville (0-0) 2708	< 2% (-51)	—	—	—	—
8	Dallas Skyline (0-0) 1327	61% (+4)	—	—	—	—
9	@Crowley (0-0) 1329	61% (+4)	—	—	—	—
10	#4North Crowley (0-0) 2608	< 2% (-47)	—	—	—	—
11	@#3Waxahachie (0-0) 2622	< 2% (-48)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 11-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		2	Duncanville (1) Panthers	94.8 2708	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		3	Waxahachie (3) Indians	93.5 2622	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3		4	North Crowley (4) Panthers	93.3 2608	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D2
4		54	Mansfield Lake Ridge (5) Eagles	81.9 1850	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	71.9%	D2
5		90	Red Oak (8) Hawks	78.2 1605	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.5	18.4%	—
6		137	Mansfield (6) Tigers	75.6 1434	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.7-5.3	5.1%	—
7		163	Dallas Skyline (2) Raiders	74 1327	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-5.7	2.3%	—
8		161	Crowley (7) Eagles	74 1329	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-5.8	2.4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Mansfield’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2015

12-3

Rating 733 (96th)

#2 · 2017

11-2

Rating 706 (94th)

#3 · 2016

9-3

Rating 691 (93rd)

#4 · 2014

7-4

Rating 668 (90th)

#5 · 2011

11-2

Rating 658 (89th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-6	1500	29.6	37.6	−8.0	1575	−0.3	+3.5	−3.8	1405	−2.73	+0.62	−3.35	511(48th)
2024	8-3	1725	34.2	33.4	+0.8	1544	+4.9	+0.9	+4.0	1599	+0.62	+1.63	−1.01	557(64th)
2023	6-4	1590	28.6	36.3	−7.7	1793	+6.2	+1.4	+4.8	1621	−0.28	+0.76	−1.03	558(65th)
2022	7-4	1728	27.6	20.4	+7.3	1823	+6.4	−14.0	+20.4	2011	+0.48	+1.23	−0.76	618(82nd)
2021	4-6	1475	26.2	33.5	−7.3	1756	+1.9	+0.6	+1.3	1531	−2.13	+0.56	−2.69	521(52nd)
2020	4-6	1632	18.0	30.3	−12.3	1889	−2.6	−5.4	+2.8	1570	−0.84	+1.17	−2.01	549(62nd)
2019	4-6	1614	26.1	31.1	−5.0	1635	+2.4	−3.1	+5.5	1636	−2.38	+0.56	−2.94	546(61st)
2018	3-7	1681	16.8	20.3	−3.5	1661	−5.1	−11.0	+5.9	1647	−3.65	+0.30	−3.95	553(63rd)
2017	11-2	2306	34.9	15.5	+19.5	1732	+12.2	−16.5	+28.7	2216	+3.84	+4.58	−0.73	706(94th)
2016	9-3	2280	41.2	25.2	+16.1	1783	+16.2	−10.7	+26.9	2172	+2.73	+3.15	−0.42	691(93rd)
2015	12-3	2425	38.7	27.1	+11.6	1902	+18.1	−9.9	+28.0	2200	+4.94	+6.54	−1.61	733(96th)
2014	7-4	2210	33.4	25.6	+7.7	1848	+9.8	−12.1	+21.9	2048	+1.28	+2.12	−0.84	668(90th)
2013	5-6	1812	21.5	27.6	−6.1	1838	−0.1	−8.8	+8.7	1718	−0.43	+1.51	−1.94	588(74th)
2012	7-5	2005	33.7	25.9	+7.7	1798	+11.1	−9.5	+20.6	2015	+0.11	+1.85	−1.75	643(86th)
2011	11-2	2086	40.8	22.0	+18.8	1546	+13.0	−8.6	+21.6	2039	+2.24	+2.75	−0.51	658(89th)
2010	8-3	1593	34.6	29.2	+5.5	1454	+5.3	+0.5	+4.9	1622	−0.47	+1.15	−1.62	548(61st)
2009	1-9	1138	15.7	37.3	−21.6	1549	−12.8	+7.4	−20.3	994	−6.33	+0.14	−6.47	421(20th)
2008	7-5	1840	27.4	26.2	+1.2	1571	+0.9	−4.5	+5.4	1636	−0.85	+1.89	−2.74	582(73rd)
2007	8-3	1516	36.7	17.0	+19.7	1278	+6.0	−4.4	+10.4	1761	−1.01	+0.59	−1.60	566(67th)
2006	3-7	1187	20.4	27.0	−6.6	1257	−10.6	+4.7	−15.3	1118	−5.50	+0.14	−5.63	445(26th)
2005	5-5	1270	16.1	26.4	−10.3	1373	−13.3	+0.7	−14.0	1149	−3.31	+0.57	−3.89	458(30th)
2004	4-6	1183	21.1	26.9	−5.8	1334	−8.2	+3.9	−12.1	1199	−4.35	+0.58	−4.94	459(30th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.