← Back

CLASS 6A · District 11-6A

Mansfield Lake Ridge Eagles

Enrollment: 2,678 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#54

was #54

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1850

#54 of 249

OVR Grade

81.9

#54 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@#50Prosper Walnut Grove (0-0) 1890	46% (-2)	—	—	—	—
2	San Angelo Central (0-0) 1528	79% (+13)	—	—	—	—
3	@Richardson Lake Highlands (0-0) 1681	67% (+7)	—	—	—	—
4	@#3Waxahachie (0-0) 2622	4% (-31)	—	—	—	—
5	Mansfield (0-0) 1434	85% (+17)	—	—	—	—
7	Dallas Skyline (0-0) 1327	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
8	@#4North Crowley (0-0) 2608	4% (-30)	—	—	—	—
9	Red Oak (0-0) 1605	74% (+10)	—	—	—	—
10	@#2Duncanville (0-0) 2708	3% (-34)	—	—	—	—
11	Crowley (0-0) 1329	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 11-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		2	Duncanville (1) Panthers	94.8 2708	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		3	Waxahachie (3) Indians	93.5 2622	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3		4	North Crowley (4) Panthers	93.3 2608	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D2
4		54	Mansfield Lake Ridge (5) Eagles	81.9 1850	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	71.9%	D2
5		90	Red Oak (8) Hawks	78.2 1605	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.5	18.4%	—
6		137	Mansfield (6) Tigers	75.6 1434	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.7-5.3	5.1%	—
7		163	Dallas Skyline (2) Raiders	74 1327	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-5.7	2.3%	—
8		161	Crowley (7) Eagles	74 1329	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-5.8	2.4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Mansfield Lake Ridge’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018

9-3

Rating 615 (81st)

#2 · 2025

9-3

Rating 596 (76th)

#3 · 2022

4-6

Rating 584 (73rd)

#4 · 2019

5-5

Rating 569 (68th)

#5 · 2021

3-7

Rating 551 (62nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	9-3	1760	41.6	34.7	+6.9	1592	+13.3	+1.6	+11.7	1793	+1.04	+1.90	−0.85	596(76th)
2024	1-9	814	17.6	43.5	−25.9	1586	−11.3	+12.7	−24.0	900	−6.49	+0.07	−6.57	382(12th)
2023	0-10	1052	13.4	46.2	−32.8	1903	−7.1	+9.9	−17.0	1075	−5.68	0.00	−5.68	448(27th)
2022	4-6	1688	32.1	35.8	−3.7	1837	+12.2	+1.5	+10.7	1767	−1.28	+0.79	−2.06	584(73rd)
2021	3-7	1547	27.5	43.5	−16.0	1924	+8.6	+5.2	+3.4	1584	−1.47	+0.53	−2.00	551(62nd)
2020	0-9	1312	12.7	38.0	−25.3	2073	−5.1	−1.0	−4.2	1395	−3.83	0.00	−3.83	503(45th)
2019	5-5	1781	33.9	37.0	−3.1	1727	+9.9	+2.3	+7.6	1690	−0.95	+1.53	−2.48	569(68th)
2018	9-3	1965	35.7	29.6	+6.1	1733	+13.7	−2.4	+16.2	1904	+2.16	+3.62	−1.46	615(81st)
2017	0-1	1447	21.0	37.0	−16.0	2061	+2.8	−1.1	+3.9	1599	−0.20	0.00	−0.20	—
2016	0-1	1451	35.0	55.0	−20.0	2217	+20.6	+13.2	+7.4	1685	−0.18	0.00	−0.18	—
2015	1-0	1455	30.0	13.0	+17.0	1603	+1.6	−18.6	+20.2	2004	+0.41	+0.41	0.00	—
2014	0-1	1195	21.0	38.0	−17.0	1662	−2.7	+4.7	−7.4	1316	−0.36	0.00	−0.36	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.