← Back
CLASS 6A · District 15-6A

Magnolia West Mustangs

Enrollment: 2,329 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#186
was #186
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1164
#186 of 249
OVR Grade
71.5
#186 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Bryan (0-0) 1064
60% (+4)
2
Cy Creek (0-0) 1081
59% (+3)
3
Magnolia (0-0) 1863
5% (-28)
4
@Klein Forest (0-0) 1329
33% (-7)
5
Klein Cain (0-0) 1785
7% (-25)
6
@#40Tomball (0-0) 1941
4% (-31)
8
#42Klein Collins (0-0) 1936
4% (-31)
9
@Klein (0-0) 1882
5% (-29)
10
#37Klein Oak (0-0) 1959
3% (-32)
11
@Tomball Memorial (0-0) 1505
19% (-14)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 15-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 37
Panthers
83.5
1959
0-0 0-0 5.7-2.3 81.3% D1
2 40
Cougars
83.3
1941
0-0 0-0 5.5-2.5 77.4% D2
3 42
Tigers
83.2
1936
0-0 0-0 5.5-2.5 77.6% D2
4 51
Bearkats
82.4
1882
0-0 0-0 5.1-2.9 65.2% D1
5 52
Bulldogs
82.1
1863
0-0 0-0 5-3 57.4%
6 64
Hurricanes
80.9
1785
0-0 0-0 4.4-3.6 37.4%
7 114
Wildcats
76.7
1505
0-0 0-0 2.5-5.5 3.2%
8 160
Golden Eagles
74
1329
0-0 0-0 1.5-6.5 < 2%
9 186
Mustangs
71.5
1164
0-0 0-0 0.8-7.2 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Magnolia West’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2024
1-9
Rating 454 (29th)
#2 · 2025
2-8
Rating 441 (25th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 1123 19.8 40.8 −21.0 1663 −9.6 +5.0 −14.6 1135 −3.91 +0.15 −4.06 441(25th)
2024 1-9 1169 19.4 36.8 −17.4 1629 −7.9 +3.9 −11.8 1205 −5.77 +0.06 −5.83 454(29th)
2023 1-0 1654 49.0 6.0 +43.0 897 +12.0 −6.6 +18.7 1967 +0.05 +0.05 0.00
2022 1-0 1638 43.0 0.0 +43.0 1146 +16.0 −11.8 +27.8 2195 +0.07 +0.07 0.00
2021 1-0 1613 27.0 14.0 +13.0 2009 +5.9 −31.9 +37.8 2445 +0.64 +0.64 0.00
2020 0-1 1369 13.0 28.0 −15.0 2014 −4.3 −12.8 +8.4 1710 −0.18 0.00 −0.18
2019 0-1 1367 21.0 26.0 −5.0 1630 +2.2 −2.0 +4.3 1606 −0.70 0.00 −0.70
2018 0-1 1390 40.0 45.0 −5.0 1629 +6.7 +9.4 −2.7 1432 −0.90 0.00 −0.90
2016 1-0 1475 34.0 9.0 +25.0 1228 +1.6 −13.6 +15.2 1881 +0.07 +0.07 0.00
2015 0-1 1406 23.0 47.0 −24.0 1852 −1.3 +3.3 −4.5 1386 −0.70 0.00 −0.70
2014 0-1 1473 50.0 61.0 −11.0 1801 +25.1 +20.5 +4.6 1616 −0.56 0.00 −0.56
2011 1-0 1510 46.0 12.0 +34.0 1107 +7.2 −9.8 +17.0 1926 +0.27 +0.27 0.00
2010 1-0 1262 27.0 7.0 +20.0 1617 −1.0 −25.3 +24.4 2110 +0.23 +0.23 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.