| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laredo Alexander (4-2) 1319 |
81% (+14) | W 46-39 | 1467 | +12.6 | +14.0 | +0.05 | — |
| 2 | McAllen Rowe |
90% (+21) | W 28-24 | 1060 | −10.8 | +6.8 | +0.02 | — |
| 3 | @McAllen Memorial |
79% (+13) | W 54-20 | 1993 | +18.9 | −0.9 | +0.06 | — |
| 4 | @Mission Veterans Memorial |
82% (+15) | L 31-35 | 1202 | −1.0 | +11.0 | — | −0.94 |
| 5 | Edinburg Vela (5-1) 1690 |
33% (-7) | L 42-49 | 1507 | +14.4 | +14.1 | — | −0.73 |
| 7 | @PSJA North (5-1) 1798 |
18% (-14) | L 3-41 | 1044 | −18.8 | −0.5 | — | −0.60 |
| 8 | San Benito (4-2) 1282 |
58% (+3) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @PSJA (2-4) 934 |
86% (+17) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Brownsville Veterans Memorial (4-2) 1432 |
43% (-3) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Harlingen (4-2) 1428 |
43% (-3) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#150
was #145
Record
3-3
0-1 district
Elo
1360
#150 of 249
OVR Grade
74.5
#150 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
76.8
#103 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
68.7
#180 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1379
#145 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 32-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Los Fresnos’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2008
12-1
Rating 626 (84th)
#2 · 2025
11-1
Rating 571 (69th)
#3 · 2017
9-4
Rating 569 (68th)
#4 · 2021
7-4
Rating 560 (66th)
#5 · 2015
9-2
Rating 552 (63rd)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.