| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Lufkin |
94% (+27) | W 59-7 | 2938 | +33.8 | −23.8 | +0.30 | — |
| 2 | Marshall |
94% (+27) | W 61-14 | 2865 | +36.8 | −17.8 | +0.31 | — |
| 3 | @Ruston (LA) |
55% (+2) | L 22-36 | — | — | — | — | −0.13 |
| 4 | #37North Forney (1-4) 2041 |
63% (+5) | W 49-13 | 2917 | +22.3 | −34.4 | +0.83 | — |
| 5 | @Royse City (1-5) 1569 |
97% (+33) | W 42-7 | 2486 | +14.7 | −24.8 | +0.27 | — |
| 7 | 83% (+15) | W 56-49 | 2215 | +23.1 | −5.5 | +0.71 | — | |
| 8 | #44Rockwall-Heath (4-2) 1987 |
88% (+19) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Tyler Legacy (2-4) 1413 |
> 98% (+42) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Mesquite Horn (0-6) 1116 |
> 98% (+54) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Forney (2-4) 1531 |
> 98% (+37) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#8
was #9
Record
5-1
3-0 district
Elo
2462
#8 of 249
OVR Grade
91.1
#8 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
93.4
#5 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
93.1
#10 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2684
#5 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 10-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Longview’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2018
16-0
Rating 861 (100th)
#2 · 2019
11-1
Rating 791 (99th)
#3 · 2017
13-2
Rating 741 (97th)
#4 · 2024
12-3
Rating 741 (97th)
#5 · 2025
7-5
Rating 731 (96th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.