← Back
CLASS 6A · District 10-6A

Longview Lobos

Enrollment: 2,400 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#14
was #14
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2322
#14 of 249
OVR Grade
89
#14 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Lufkin
94% (+27)
2
Marshall
94% (+26)
3
@Ruston (LA)
52% (+1)
4
#8North Forney (0-0) 2478
34% (-6)
5
@Royse City (0-0) 1686
93% (+25)
7
@#46Rockwall (0-0) 1908
85% (+17)
8
#44Rockwall-Heath (0-0) 1927
84% (+16)
9
@Tyler Legacy (0-0) 1473
97% (+34)
10
Mesquite Horn (0-0) 1599
95% (+29)
11
@Forney (0-0) 1808
90% (+21)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 10-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 8
Falcons
91.4
2478
0-0 0-0 6.4-0.6 > 98% D2
2 14
Lobos
89
2322
0-0 0-0 5.8-1.2 > 98% D2
3 44
Hawks
83
1927
0-0 0-0 3.8-3.2 70.5% D1
4 46
Yellowjackets
82.8
1908
0-0 0-0 3.7-3.3 65% D1
5 61
Jackrabbits
81.2
1808
0-0 0-0 3.1-3.9 38.6%
6 77
Bulldogs
79.4
1686
0-0 0-0 2.3-4.7 16.7%
7 92
Jaguars
78.1
1599
0-0 0-0 1.8-5.2 8%
8 127
Red Raiders
76.2
1473
0-0 0-0 1.2-5.8 2.2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Longview’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018
16-0
Rating 861 (100th)
#2 · 2019
11-1
Rating 791 (99th)
#3 · 2017
13-2
Rating 741 (97th)
#4 · 2024
12-3
Rating 741 (97th)
#5 · 2025
7-5
Rating 731 (96th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-5 2238 38.7 25.3 +13.3 1954 +16.0 −16.6 +32.5 2314 +1.53 +2.59 −1.05 731(96th)
2024 12-3 2500 32.2 17.1 +15.1 1764 +8.7 −20.3 +29.0 2225 +3.42 +4.73 −1.30 741(97th)
2023 1-1 2089 24.5 15.0 +9.5 1696 +3.5 −13.0 +16.5 1913 −0.39 +0.08 −0.47
2022 2-0 2220 52.5 5.0 +47.5 1416 +21.1 −20.6 +41.6 2541 +0.63 +0.63 0.00
2021 1-0 2312 46.0 20.0 +26.0 1749 +19.5 −17.9 +37.4 2436 +0.60 +0.60 0.00
2020 2-1 2311 33.7 27.3 +6.3 1864 +9.4 −14.5 +23.8 2096 +0.77 +1.22 −0.45
2019 11-1 2575 41.4 10.2 +31.2 1745 +19.0 −25.6 +44.5 2613 +3.71 +4.17 −0.47 791(99th)
2018 16-0 2676 49.8 19.7 +30.1 1868 +26.9 −16.7 +43.6 2591 +8.18 +8.18 0.00 861(100th)
2017 13-2 2401 41.2 20.9 +20.3 1863 +17.3 −16.6 +33.9 2347 +5.50 +5.97 −0.47 741(97th)
2016 7-3 2039 42.8 28.5 +14.3 1744 +13.3 −10.7 +24.0 2099 +1.14 +2.48 −1.33 649(87th)
2013 11-2 2255 41.6 20.8 +20.8 1812 +19.4 −16.6 +35.9 2399 +4.29 +4.64 −0.34 716(95th)
2012 9-4 2043 34.2 18.4 +15.8 1786 +12.2 −15.6 +27.7 2194 +1.38 +2.81 −1.42 678(91st)
2011 11-2 2235 34.5 20.1 +14.4 1939 +14.4 −17.5 +31.9 2298 +4.63 +5.13 −0.49 716(95th)
2010 10-5 2284 26.9 20.6 +6.3 1956 +6.7 −18.1 +24.8 2121 +4.22 +5.62 −1.40 720(96th)
2009 2-1 2073 24.3 20.0 +4.3 2221 +12.4 −20.6 +33.0 2325 +0.91 +1.42 −0.52
2008 2-1 2175 24.3 19.3 +5.0 2174 +13.0 −17.3 +30.3 2258 +0.91 +1.07 −0.16
2007 12-2 2170 28.8 16.0 +12.8 1735 +8.7 −13.7 +22.4 2060 +3.97 +4.49 −0.52 680(91st)
2006 9-3 2221 31.1 20.1 +11.0 1688 +12.3 −8.9 +21.2 2030 +1.97 +3.30 −1.33 672(91st)
2005 10-1 2299 35.2 12.8 +22.4 1629 +14.4 −14.5 +28.9 2222 +2.96 +3.56 −0.60 710(95th)
2004 12-1 2108 33.6 16.7 +16.9 1647 +16.4 −11.3 +27.7 2192 +2.95 +3.09 −0.14 687(92nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.