← Back
CLASS 6A · District 5-6A

Lewisville Hebron Hawks

Enrollment: 3,619 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#60
was #63
Record
4-2
3-0 district
Elo
1854
#60 of 249
OVR Grade
81.9
#60 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
76.7
#105 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
81.9
#61 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1761
#82 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@#21Coppell (5-1) 2214
 15% (-17) L 10-40 1623 −0.3 −5.3 — −0.21
2
@#31Prosper Walnut Grove (5-1) 2078
 25% (-11) L 0-35 1337 −19.5 −13.0 — −0.36
3
Richardson Berkner (2-4) 1624
 58% (+3) W 24-23 1756 +1.4 −8.8 +0.25 —
5
Little Elm (3-3) 1426
 67% (+7) W 24-21 1722 −0.3 −9.1 +0.20 —
6
@Flower Mound Marcus (2-4) 1424
 59% (+3) W 56-28 2067 +23.9 +1.3 +0.29 —
7
Frisco Wakeland (2-4) 1457
 78% (+12) W 38-10 2063 +9.1 −13.4 +0.19 —
8
@#9Lewisville (3-3) 2457
 7% (-24) — — — — — —
9
#19Denton Guyer (4-2) 2248
 16% (-16) — — — — — —
10
Flower Mound (5-1) 1720
 64% (+5) — — — — — —
11
@Denton Braswell (5-1) 1736
 62% (+5) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 5-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 9
Fighting Farmers
91
2457
 3-3 3-0 45.7 14.2 6.8-0.2 > 98% D1
2 19
Wildcats
87.9
2248
 4-2 2-1 32.5 21.5 5.7-1.3 > 98% D2
3 60
Hawks
81.9
1854
 4-2 3-0 25.3 26.2 4.5-2.5 87.7% D1
4 75
Bengals
80.2
1736
 5-1 2-1 30.8 26.7 4-3 84.9% D2
5 81
Jaguars
79.9
1720
 5-1 2-1 31.2 16.2 3.2-3.8 24% —
6 131
Wolverines
76
1457
 2-4 0-3 16.3 35.0 1.6-5.4 3.1% —
7 140
Marauders
75.5
1424
 2-4 0-3 23.0 36.5 1.2-5.8 < 2% —
8 139
Lobos
75.5
1426
 3-3 0-3 29.8 24.2 1-6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Lewisville Hebron’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013
8-4
Rating 688 (93rd)
#2 · 2008
8-4
Rating 672 (91st)
#3 · 2017
7-3
Rating 667 (90th)
#4 · 2010
6-4
Rating 663 (90th)
#5 · 2024
8-5
Rating 658 (89th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-6 1813 31.6 29.6 +2.0 1835 +11.0 −5.1 +16.1 1902 −0.73 +0.75 −1.48 616(82nd)
2024 8-5 2010 34.3 28.2 +6.2 1847 +10.5 −9.1 +19.6 1989 +1.53 +2.37 −0.84 658(89th)
2023 5-5 1504 24.6 27.7 −3.1 1563 −2.9 −1.6 −1.3 1467 −2.11 +0.90 −3.02 523(53rd)
2022 5-5 1617 28.3 28.5 −0.2 1653 +3.4 −2.1 +5.5 1637 −1.57 +0.79 −2.36 549(62nd)
2021 5-6 1817 29.7 34.9 −5.2 1891 +8.2 −3.7 +11.9 1798 −0.40 +1.09 −1.49 601(78th)
2020 4-3 1758 29.9 32.6 −2.7 1707 +3.6 −2.6 +6.2 1656 −0.42 +0.99 −1.42 —
2019 8-3 1982 34.3 21.4 +12.9 1588 +6.8 −10.1 +16.9 1921 +1.21 +2.39 −1.18 617(82nd)
2018 8-5 1938 33.4 24.8 +8.5 1621 +8.2 −5.1 +13.3 1833 +0.30 +2.51 −2.21 613(81st)
2017 7-3 2123 36.8 24.6 +12.2 1816 +15.7 −9.1 +24.8 2120 +1.40 +2.44 −1.04 667(90th)
2016 8-4 1915 31.3 29.8 +1.5 1766 +8.6 −5.1 +13.7 1842 +0.93 +2.32 −1.40 616(82nd)
2015 4-7 1822 24.2 27.7 −3.5 1946 +4.5 −8.9 +13.5 1837 −0.76 +1.80 −2.56 613(81st)
2014 2-8 1578 19.0 36.2 −17.2 1905 −2.1 −1.5 −0.6 1485 −2.77 +0.22 −2.99 541(59th)
2013 8-4 2088 29.2 19.6 +9.6 1952 +11.6 −15.7 +27.3 2182 +2.05 +3.01 −0.96 688(93rd)
2012 6-5 1815 20.1 22.6 −2.5 1864 +1.4 −10.4 +11.9 1796 +0.78 +2.08 −1.30 602(78th)
2011 6-5 1956 26.5 22.7 +3.7 1894 +5.1 −14.7 +19.8 1995 +1.18 +2.71 −1.53 646(87th)
2010 6-4 2063 33.0 26.7 +6.3 1880 +10.5 −11.8 +22.3 2056 +1.10 +2.58 −1.48 663(90th)
2009 4-6 1860 34.0 29.6 +4.4 1773 +9.4 −4.9 +14.3 1858 −1.29 +1.42 −2.70 607(79th)
2008 8-4 2229 26.8 22.5 +4.3 1875 +7.1 −13.3 +20.4 2010 +2.17 +3.63 −1.45 672(91st)
2007 11-3 2041 32.6 23.9 +8.6 1629 +9.0 −5.2 +14.2 1856 +2.34 +3.13 −0.79 634(85th)
2006 10-2 1917 27.7 16.0 +11.7 1595 +4.4 −11.9 +16.3 1907 +1.53 +2.31 −0.78 635(85th)
2005 2-0 1653 33.5 6.0 +27.5 1212 +6.1 −13.5 +19.6 1990 +0.13 +0.13 0.00 —
2004 2-0 1603 61.0 7.0 +54.0 1125 +30.4 −8.4 +38.8 2470 +0.28 +0.28 0.00 —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.