| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Pflugerville |
22% (-12) | L 21-25 | 1084 | −13.3 | +3.3 | — | −0.96 |
| 2 | @Lockhart |
76% (+11) | L 14-31 | 252 | −30.5 | +19.5 | — | −1.00 |
| 3 | Austin Akins (1-5) 282 |
33% (-7) | W 56-0 | 1349 | −7.0 | −1.0 | +0.01 | — |
| 4 | @Buda Hays Consolidated (4-3) 1432 |
3% (-34) | L 13-45 | 739 | −15.8 | +14.7 | — | −0.70 |
| 5 | < 2% (-50) | L 0-56 | 793 | −18.1 | +10.1 | — | −0.30 | |
| 7 | Leander Rouse (4-3) 1600 |
4% (-32) | L 3-31 | 1036 | −19.5 | −0.9 | — | −0.74 |
| 8 | @Hutto (5-2) 1894 |
< 2% (-44) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | #34Austin Vandegrift (4-2) 2056 |
< 2% (-50) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Georgetown East View (2-4) 1209 |
15% (-16) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Cedar Park Vista Ridge (2-5) 1360 |
9% (-22) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#223
was #224
Record
1-5
0-2 district
Elo
798
#223 of 249
OVR Grade
66
#223 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
62.8
#228 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
68.5
#182 of 249 in 6A
Perf
875
#214 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 24-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Leander’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2006
10-3
Rating 658 (89th)
#2 · 2011
8-4
Rating 647 (87th)
#3 · 2007
9-4
Rating 637 (85th)
#4 · 2010
7-6
Rating 625 (83rd)
#5 · 2009
8-4
Rating 609 (80th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.