| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PSJA North (5-1) 1798 |
40% (-4) | L 21-46 | 1369 | −0.8 | +4.5 | — | −0.69 |
| 2 | @Boerne |
19% (-14) | L 34-41 | 1668 | +12.9 | +6.1 | — | −0.53 |
| 3 | @San Antonio Reagan (3-2-1) 1744 |
34% (-6) | T 0-0 | 1556 | −22.7 | −24.9 | — | — |
| 4 | Eagle Pass (2-4) 1033 |
81% (+14) | W 56-7 | 2121 | +15.5 | −9.3 | +0.04 | — |
| 5 | @San Antonio Southwest (1-4) 791 |
94% (+26) | W 27-20 | 1061 | −7.9 | +9.6 | +0.01 | — |
| 7 | Laredo Johnson (4-2) 1205 |
74% (+10) | W 32-14 | 1677 | −3.3 | −10.4 | +0.08 | — |
| 8 | @Laredo United South (2-4) 988 |
91% (+22) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | San Antonio Southwest Legacy (2-3-1) 856 |
95% (+28) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Del Rio (0-6) 547 |
> 98% (+40) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Laredo Alexander (4-2) 1319 |
72% (+9) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#110
was #121
Record
3-2-1
3-0 district
Elo
1549
#110 of 249
OVR Grade
77.3
#110 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
74.2
#132 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
78.5
#92 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1575
#108 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 30-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Laredo United’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2016
9-4
Rating 600 (77th)
#2 · 2025
10-3
Rating 594 (76th)
#3 · 2015
10-3
Rating 587 (74th)
#4 · 2013
10-3
Rating 583 (73rd)
#5 · 2019
9-3
Rating 583 (73rd)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.