← Back
CLASS 6A · District 30-6A

Laredo United South Panthers

Enrollment: 3,190 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#207
was #209
Record
2-4
2-1 district
Elo
988
#207 of 249
OVR Grade
68.9
#207 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
65.3
#216 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
71.4
#164 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1049
#194 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Boerne Champion
 6% (-26) L 7-60 288 −18.7 +29.7 — −0.74
2
San Antonio Brandeis (3-3) 1461
 5% (-28) L 7-17 1140 −20.7 −6.3 — −0.71
3
@Castroville Medina Valley
 4% (-31) L 19-30 1434 −4.8 −2.2 — −0.65
4
@Laredo Alexander (4-2) 1319
 23% (-12) L 14-17 1217 −19.4 −8.0 — −0.94
5
San Antonio Southwest Legacy (2-3-1) 856
 46% (-1) W 25-22 976 −13.4 +7.6 +0.02 —
7
@Del Rio (0-6) 547
 82% (+15) W 38-7 1241 −5.8 +4.6 +0.00 —
8
Laredo United (3-2-1) 1549
 9% (-22) — — — — — —
9
@Eagle Pass (2-4) 1033
 45% (-2) — — — — — —
10
San Antonio Southwest (1-4) 791
 70% (+8) — — — — — —
11
@Laredo Johnson (4-2) 1205
 29% (-9) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 30-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 110
Longhorns
77.3
1549
 3-2 3-0 28.3 21.3 6.6-0.4 > 98% D1
2 161
Bulldogs
73.9
1319
 4-2 3-0 32.0 27.0 5.8-1.2 > 98% D2
3 176
Wolves
72.2
1205
 4-2 2-1 35.5 25.2 4.6-2.4 90.7% D1
4 203
Eagles
69.6
1033
 2-4 1-2 23.3 33.7 3.4-3.6 57.6% D2
5 207
Panthers
68.9
988
 2-4 2-1 18.3 25.5 3.5-3.5 46.6% —
6 224
Dragons
65.9
791
 1-4 1-2 16.6 26.0 2-5 3.8% —
7 218
Titans
66.9
856
 2-3 0-3 25.2 26.8 1.7-5.3 < 2% —
8 240
Rams
62.2
547
 0-6 0-3 10.0 33.7 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Laredo United South’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021
9-4
Rating 566 (67th)
#2 · 2016
10-3
Rating 547 (61st)
#3 · 2019
7-3
Rating 543 (60th)
#4 · 2020
4-4
Rating 512 (49th)
#5 · 2015
6-5
Rating 491 (41st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 928 16.7 30.3 −13.6 1305 −14.7 +7.3 −22.1 948 −6.77 +0.05 −6.82 398(15th)
2024 4-7 1050 23.0 23.1 −0.1 1240 −7.4 +3.0 −10.4 1240 −5.76 +0.17 −5.93 448(27th)
2023 3-8 1068 18.4 27.4 −9.0 1389 −10.5 +3.4 −13.9 1153 −5.96 +0.21 −6.18 442(25th)
2022 3-7 1353 22.7 25.5 −2.8 1403 −5.8 −0.1 −5.7 1357 −4.85 +0.69 −5.53 487(39th)
2021 9-4 1767 27.5 17.6 +9.8 1324 −2.1 −5.5 +3.4 1586 −1.22 +1.14 −2.37 566(67th)
2020 4-4 1468 28.2 26.1 +2.1 1387 −0.3 +2.2 −2.4 1439 −1.82 +0.45 −2.27 512(49th)
2019 7-3 1688 37.0 27.0 +10.0 1328 +4.5 +1.9 +2.6 1565 −1.23 +1.14 −2.37 543(60th)
2018 3-8 1169 21.7 25.2 −3.5 1328 −7.5 +3.6 −11.1 1222 −6.22 +0.20 −6.43 451(28th)
2017 4-7 1203 23.4 29.5 −6.1 1287 −5.5 +7.5 −13.0 1176 −5.40 +0.56 −5.96 448(27th)
2016 10-3 1725 28.1 22.1 +6.0 1323 −1.4 −0.8 −0.5 1487 −0.13 +1.75 −1.88 547(61st)
2015 6-5 1358 23.0 22.1 +0.9 1369 −7.1 −3.1 −4.0 1400 −2.39 +0.32 −2.70 491(41st)
2014 2-8 868 15.6 31.4 −15.8 1297 −13.7 +8.9 −22.6 934 −6.42 +0.05 −6.46 386(12th)
2013 6-5 1119 19.7 16.5 +3.3 1050 −14.0 +0.1 −14.1 1148 −3.82 +0.11 −3.93 444(26th)
2012 4-5 897 18.7 23.9 −5.2 1019 −16.6 +7.7 −24.3 893 −4.35 +0.03 −4.38 385(12th)
2011 2-8 688 18.6 40.2 −21.6 1062 −15.5 +22.5 −38.0 551 −7.33 +0.01 −7.35 322(4th)
2010 4-6 799 19.4 33.3 −13.9 981 −14.6 +19.9 −34.5 637 −5.58 +0.02 −5.60 345(6th)
2009 3-7 833 18.8 28.8 −10.0 1075 −15.3 +11.0 −26.3 841 −6.03 +0.02 −6.05 374(10th)
2008 3-6 785 21.4 25.7 −4.2 1016 −14.3 +9.1 −23.4 914 −5.51 +0.02 −5.53 380(11th)
2007 7-4 1003 20.6 20.0 +0.6 860 −17.0 +6.9 −23.9 904 −3.49 +0.10 −3.58 400(15th)
2006 5-5 792 21.9 23.9 −2.0 839 −17.0 +12.0 −29.0 776 −4.60 +0.08 −4.68 365(9th)
2005 0-10 161 5.7 42.3 −36.6 963 −29.9 +28.9 −58.8 29 −9.58 0.00 −9.58 209(0th)
2004 0-10 261 2.8 55.7 −52.9 930 −34.6 +41.2 −75.8 -396 −9.66 0.00 −9.66 164(0th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.