← Back
CLASS 6A · District 30-6A

Laredo Johnson Wolves

Enrollment: 3,271 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#195
was #195
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1111
#195 of 249
OVR Grade
70.7
#195 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Laredo Nixon
66% (+6)
2
@Corpus Christi Flour Bluff
14% (-17)
3
Eagle Pass Winn
94% (+26)
4 66% (+6)
5
Del Rio (0-0) 733
83% (+15)
7
@Laredo United (0-0) 1559
13% (-18)
8
Eagle Pass (0-0) 1207
40% (-4)
9 69% (+8)
10
@Laredo Alexander (0-0) 1125
49% (-1)
11 67% (+7)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 30-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 101
Longhorns
77.5
1559
0-0 0-0 6.3-0.7 > 98% D1
2 180
Eagles
72.2
1207
0-0 0-0 4.5-2.5 85.5% D2
3 194
Bulldogs
70.9
1125
0-0 0-0 4-3 71.1% D2
4 195
Wolves
70.7
1111
0-0 0-0 3.9-3.1 66.7% D1
5 212
Titans
68.3
948
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 28.2%
6 213
Panthers
68.2
941
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 24.6%
7 218
Dragons
67.8
920
0-0 0-0 2.5-4.5 20.5%
8 234
Rams
65
733
0-0 0-0 1.4-5.6 3.7%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Laredo Johnson’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2015
7-3
Rating 478 (36th)
#2 · 2014
6-5
Rating 449 (28th)
#3 · 2025
7-4
Rating 429 (22nd)
#4 · 2010
5-5
Rating 406 (16th)
#5 · 2011
6-4
Rating 405 (16th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-4 1098 19.1 26.2 −7.1 1227 −12.9 +4.5 −17.4 1065 −2.44 +0.36 −2.81 429(22nd)
2024 3-7 950 17.1 20.7 −3.6 1056 −16.7 +4.5 −21.1 972 −6.38 +0.11 −6.49 404(16th)
2023 5-5 668 18.4 21.6 −3.2 839 −22.2 +7.8 −30.0 751 −4.66 +0.03 −4.69 352(7th)
2022 5-5 825 21.0 21.3 −0.3 941 −17.5 +5.4 −22.9 928 −4.25 +0.17 −4.42 383(12th)
2021 2-8 631 12.4 35.5 −23.1 1109 −22.1 +17.1 −39.2 519 −7.39 +0.05 −7.44 307(3rd)
2020 0-6 553 11.0 44.7 −33.7 1355 −18.7 +21.3 −40.0 499 −5.17 0.00 −5.17
2019 2-7 684 7.7 34.4 −26.8 1275 −25.3 +11.0 −36.3 592 −5.41 +0.04 −5.45 322(5th)
2018 3-7 762 12.1 27.2 −15.1 1250 −18.7 +7.8 −26.5 838 −5.70 +0.09 −5.79 363(9th)
2017 0-10 547 11.5 29.0 −17.5 1197 −19.9 +9.5 −29.3 767 −8.97 0.00 −8.97 335(5th)
2016 1-9 722 10.4 32.4 −22.0 1194 −22.4 +11.5 −33.9 652 −7.62 +0.00 −7.63 335(5th)
2015 7-3 1240 24.6 15.7 +8.9 1112 −10.7 −3.4 −7.3 1318 −2.03 +0.65 −2.68 478(36th)
2014 6-5 1129 16.6 15.3 +1.4 1090 −16.6 −3.3 −13.3 1167 −4.14 +0.37 −4.52 449(28th)
2013 1-9 524 6.9 26.0 −19.1 1150 −25.2 +7.9 −33.1 671 −8.13 +0.02 −8.14 321(4th)
2012 2-7 751 11.3 31.1 −19.8 1201 −20.9 +11.3 −32.2 695 −6.16 +0.03 −6.20 345(7th)
2011 6-4 1077 14.3 19.0 −4.7 997 −22.3 +1.4 −23.7 909 −3.32 +0.06 −3.38 405(16th)
2010 5-5 960 14.0 15.3 −1.3 957 −21.8 +1.4 −23.2 919 −4.23 +0.10 −4.33 406(16th)
2009 0-1 461 6.0 22.0 −16.0 833 −32.1 +10.8 −42.9 427 −0.99 0.00 −0.99
2008 0-1 465 13.0 37.0 −24.0 785 −23.7 +24.8 −48.6 285 −0.98 0.00 −0.98
2007 2-8 436 17.6 32.7 −15.1 902 −19.3 +19.8 −39.1 523 −7.58 +0.03 −7.62 299(3rd)
2006 1-9 314 13.7 34.8 −21.1 936 −23.3 +21.2 −44.5 388 −8.63 +0.01 −8.64 270(1st)
2005 3-6 578 12.4 36.1 −23.7 907 −23.8 +22.6 −46.4 339 −5.65 +0.03 −5.68 288(2nd)
2004 3-7 613 20.8 33.6 −12.8 885 −19.1 +19.5 −38.6 534 −6.79 +0.05 −6.83 319(4th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.