← Back

CLASS 6A · District 30-6A

Laredo Alexander Bulldogs

Enrollment: 3,169 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#161

was #162

Record

4-2

3-0 district

Elo

1319

#161 of 249

OVR Grade

73.9

#161 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

73.2

#142 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

68.9

#179 of 249 in 6A

Perf

1259

#164 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@Los Fresnos (3-3) 1360	19% (-14)	L 39-46	1179	+3.0	+15.9	—	−0.83
2	@Gregory-Portland	22% (-12)	L 22-43	917	−7.2	+16.2	—	−0.87
3	San Benito (4-2) 1282	35% (-6)	W 28-7	1683	−2.8	−10.2	+0.06	—
4	Laredo United South (2-4) 988	77% (+12)	W 17-14	1130	−15.0	−0.2	+0.02	—
5	@Eagle Pass (2-4) 1033	67% (+7)	W 37-17	1396	−3.5	+0.7	+0.04	—
7	@San Antonio Southwest Legacy (2-3-1) 856	85% (+17)	W 49-35	1251	+10.6	+20.6	+0.02	—
8	San Antonio Southwest (1-4) 791	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	@Del Rio (0-6) 547	96% (+31)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	Laredo Johnson (4-2) 1205	62% (+5)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	@Laredo United (3-2-1) 1549	28% (-9)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 30-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		110	Laredo United (1) Longhorns	77.3 1549	3-2	3-0	28.3	21.3	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D1
2		161	Laredo Alexander (4) Bulldogs	73.9 1319	4-2	3-0	32.0	27.0	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D2
3		176	Laredo Johnson (2) Wolves	72.2 1205	4-2	2-1	35.5	25.2	4.6-2.4	90.7%	D1
4		203	Eagle Pass (6) Eagles	69.6 1033	2-4	1-2	23.3	33.7	3.4-3.6	57.6%	D2
5		207	Laredo United South (3) Panthers	68.9 988	2-4	2-1	18.3	25.5	3.5-3.5	46.6%	—
6		224	San Antonio Southwest (7) Dragons	65.9 791	1-4	1-2	16.6	26.0	2-5	3.8%	—
7		218	San Antonio Southwest Legacy (8) Titans	66.9 856	2-3	0-3	25.2	26.8	1.7-5.3	< 2%	—
8		240	Del Rio (5) Rams	62.2 547	0-6	0-3	10.0	33.7	0.4-6.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Laredo Alexander’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2011

12-1

Rating 601 (78th)

#2 · 2012

9-4

Rating 543 (60th)

#3 · 2013

9-4

Rating 534 (56th)

#4 · 2018

9-3

Rating 533 (56th)

#5 · 2010

10-3

Rating 515 (50th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1015	20.8	23.9	−3.1	1185	−12.9	+3.3	−16.2	1096	−4.78	+0.33	−5.11	425(21st)
2024	6-5	1350	20.3	20.9	−0.6	1231	−9.8	−0.6	−9.2	1269	−3.39	+0.47	−3.87	479(36th)
2023	6-5	1180	27.5	29.3	−1.8	1177	−7.4	+7.5	−14.9	1127	−4.10	+0.28	−4.38	448(27th)
2022	4-7	1027	22.4	32.4	−10.0	1305	−9.1	+8.5	−17.6	1060	−4.99	+0.25	−5.24	418(19th)
2021	3-7	1014	16.3	20.2	−3.9	1269	−15.9	−1.3	−14.6	1136	−5.30	+0.07	−5.38	423(20th)
2020	2-4	1087	23.5	32.3	−8.8	1266	−8.0	+10.8	−18.7	1031	−2.93	+0.04	−2.97	—
2019	6-5	1274	33.4	30.4	+3.0	1362	+1.8	+5.5	−3.7	1407	−3.54	+0.48	−4.02	484(38th)
2018	9-3	1663	20.7	17.8	+2.8	1335	−7.4	−4.1	−3.3	1417	−0.38	+1.31	−1.69	533(56th)
2017	6-6	1434	24.4	23.4	+1.0	1334	−3.9	+0.7	−4.6	1385	−3.80	+0.59	−4.40	508(47th)
2016	3-7	1108	20.5	24.5	−4.0	1324	−9.4	+0.8	−10.2	1244	−4.87	+0.04	−4.90	448(27th)
2015	5-7	1327	26.2	25.4	+0.8	1385	−4.2	+0.1	−4.3	1393	−4.66	+0.24	−4.90	499(44th)
2014	6-5	1317	28.8	20.0	+8.8	1322	−1.1	−3.0	+1.9	1547	−3.16	+0.96	−4.12	508(47th)
2013	9-4	1540	32.2	23.2	+8.9	1278	+2.4	+2.6	−0.2	1495	−1.81	+0.52	−2.33	534(56th)
2012	9-4	1608	31.5	22.6	+8.8	1274	+1.0	+0.4	+0.6	1514	−2.28	+0.62	−2.90	543(60th)
2011	12-1	1762	40.8	14.2	+26.6	1123	+7.0	−4.2	+11.2	1780	+0.70	+0.76	−0.07	601(78th)
2010	10-3	1455	35.4	23.6	+11.8	1085	+2.4	+6.9	−4.5	1388	−1.17	+0.68	−1.84	515(50th)
2009	4-7	1101	22.2	29.7	−7.5	1244	−8.0	+9.1	−17.1	1072	−5.31	+0.16	−5.47	429(22nd)
2008	4-7	1077	33.9	34.7	−0.8	1165	+1.4	+16.0	−14.5	1137	−5.89	+0.08	−5.97	436(24th)
2007	4-6	885	28.8	32.4	−3.6	973	−6.0	+18.0	−23.9	901	−5.45	+0.04	−5.50	389(13th)
2006	7-4	987	26.2	19.0	+7.2	994	−10.5	+4.9	−15.3	1117	−3.30	+0.20	−3.50	428(21st)
2005	1-9	465	10.4	26.8	−16.4	951	−25.6	+13.5	−39.2	520	−8.55	+0.00	−8.55	302(3rd)
2004	5-6	774	20.5	22.2	−1.6	944	−18.8	+7.5	−26.2	844	−5.71	+0.04	−5.75	375(10th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.