| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zapata |
80% (+13) | W 35-12 | 1137 | −11.8 | +2.8 | +0.01 | — |
| 2 | Wall |
12% (-19) | L 14-55 | 451 | −14.5 | +27.5 | — | −0.84 |
| 3 | Brownsville Pace |
81% (+14) | W 48-21 | 1237 | +1.2 | +11.8 | +0.01 | — |
| 4 | @Mission Sharyland |
48% (-1) | L 41-42 | 998 | +3.5 | +23.5 | — | −0.97 |
| 5 | @Brownsville Veterans Memorial (4-2) 1432 |
9% (-22) | L 49-56 | 1037 | +14.1 | +32.6 | — | −0.80 |
| 7 | Edinburg North (0-6) 447 |
89% (+20) | W 34-28 | 404 | −20.9 | +22.9 | +0.00 | — |
| 8 | Edinburg Vela (5-1) 1690 |
5% (-29) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Edinburg (4-2) 874 |
59% (+4) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Weslaco (3-3) 1417 |
13% (-18) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Edinburg Economedes (2-4) 1062 |
40% (-4) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#208
was #210
Record
3-3
1-0 district
Elo
963
#208 of 249
OVR Grade
68.5
#208 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
71.7
#159 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
57.8
#231 of 249 in 6A
Perf
877
#213 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 31-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how La Joya’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2004
10-3
Rating 547 (61st)
#2 · 2005
9-3
Rating 515 (50th)
#3 · 2007
6-7
Rating 501 (45th)
#4 · 2018
6-4
Rating 458 (30th)
#5 · 2006
6-6
Rating 441 (25th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.