| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Humble (1-6) 1472 |
80% (+13) | W 42-41 | 1533 | +13.0 | +11.6 | +0.16 | — |
| 2 | Conroe Oak Ridge (1-5) 1070 |
95% (+28) | W 45-20 | 1914 | +13.8 | −2.7 | +0.04 | — |
| 4 | #35Tomball (5-1) 2056 |
28% (-9) | W 55-38 | 2497 | +39.0 | −0.9 | +0.67 | — |
| 5 | @Magnolia West (2-4) 1221 |
95% (+29) | W 58-7 | 2343 | +18.6 | −15.1 | +0.07 | — |
| 6 | Klein Collins (5-2) 1934 |
44% (-2) | L 24-40 | 1692 | +4.4 | −3.3 | — | −0.32 |
| 7 | 34% (-6) | L 14-37 | 1529 | +2.7 | +1.5 | — | −0.30 | |
| 8 | Klein Oak (2-4) 1730 |
59% (+3) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Tomball Memorial (1-5) 1362 |
87% (+18) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Magnolia (3-4) 1857 |
46% (-2) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Klein Forest (1-6) 1176 |
94% (+26) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#64
was #56
Record
4-2
2-2 district
Elo
1818
#64 of 249
OVR Grade
81.4
#64 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
85.7
#32 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
76.3
#109 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1918
#58 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 15-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Klein Cain’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2021
9-3
Rating 680 (92nd)
#2 · 2020
8-3
Rating 658 (89th)
#3 · 2024
9-2
Rating 657 (89th)
#4 · 2022
10-2
Rating 656 (88th)
#5 · 2023
8-4
Rating 622 (83rd)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.