← Back

CLASS 6A · District 12-6A

Killeen Harker Heights Knights

Enrollment: 2,259 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#34

was #34

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1972

#34 of 249

OVR Grade

83.7

#34 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Hutto (0-0) 1693	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
2	Odessa Permian (0-0) 1752	72% (+9)	—	—	—	—
3	Buda Hays Consolidated (0-0) 1593	83% (+15)	—	—	—	—
4	@#26Dripping Springs (0-0) 2147	32% (-7)	—	—	—	—
6	Lake Belton (0-0) 1578	84% (+16)	—	—	—	—
7	@Temple (0-0) 1744	72% (+9)	—	—	—	—
8	Bryan (0-0) 1064	98% (+36)	—	—	—	—
9	@Killeen Chaparral (0-0) 905	> 98% (+43)	—	—	—	—
10	Copperas Cove (0-0) 1365	93% (+24)	—	—	—	—
11	@#48Waco Midway (0-0) 1907	57% (+3)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 12-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		34	Killeen Harker Heights (5) Knights	83.7 1972	0-0	0-0	—	—	5-1	> 98%	D2
2		48	Waco Midway (1) Panthers	82.7 1907	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3		68	Temple (2) Wildcats	80.3 1744	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-2	93.6%	D1
4		99	Lake Belton (6) Broncos	77.8 1578	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.2-2.8	78.1%	D2
5		152	Copperas Cove (3) Bulldawgs	74.6 1365	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-3.7	27.2%	—
6		199	Bryan (4) Vikings	70 1064	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.1-4.9	3%	—
7		219	Killeen Chaparral (7) Bobcats	67.6 905	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.6-5.4	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Killeen Harker Heights’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2022

12-2

Rating 681 (92nd)

#2 · 2025

9-3

Rating 649 (87th)

#3 · 2024

8-3

Rating 616 (82nd)

#4 · 2021

8-2

Rating 599 (77th)

#5 · 2023

7-4

Rating 566 (67th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	9-3	2001	36.1	19.9	+16.2	1593	+9.1	−11.7	+20.8	2020	+1.31	+2.60	−1.29	649(87th)
2024	8-3	1862	42.3	25.8	+16.5	1516	+12.1	−5.9	+18.0	1950	−0.03	+1.61	−1.64	616(82nd)
2023	7-4	1733	32.3	28.9	+3.4	1539	+1.6	−3.6	+5.2	1630	−1.12	+0.71	−1.83	566(67th)
2022	12-2	2178	33.6	18.3	+15.3	1711	+8.9	−15.8	+24.6	2116	+3.62	+4.12	−0.50	681(92nd)
2021	8-2	1816	47.6	31.2	+16.4	1505	+17.9	+1.7	+16.2	1905	+0.38	+1.03	−0.64	599(77th)
2020	7-4	1683	35.4	32.1	+3.3	1637	+10.0	+0.2	+9.7	1744	−0.21	+1.40	−1.61	560(66th)
2019	4-7	1418	20.9	30.1	−9.2	1641	−7.1	−3.7	−3.4	1415	−2.68	+1.18	−3.86	499(44th)
2018	1-9	1179	12.5	38.9	−26.4	1691	−13.8	+4.6	−18.3	1042	−5.38	+0.14	−5.51	428(21st)
2017	5-5	1546	25.7	32.1	−6.4	1563	−0.9	+1.1	−1.9	1451	−2.08	+0.64	−2.72	516(50th)
2016	6-5	1659	26.5	21.5	+5.1	1582	+0.2	−8.0	+8.2	1705	−1.51	+1.67	−3.18	559(65th)
2015	2-8	1304	17.1	23.9	−6.8	1511	−10.8	−4.5	−6.3	1342	−5.48	+0.13	−5.60	479(36th)
2014	5-5	1387	28.7	33.5	−4.8	1549	+1.7	+4.1	−2.3	1441	−2.29	+0.56	−2.85	501(44th)
2013	2-8	1200	28.6	39.6	−11.0	1542	−2.9	+5.6	−8.5	1288	−5.44	+0.22	−5.66	465(32nd)
2012	4-7	1579	14.0	23.8	−9.8	1636	−12.0	−9.2	−2.8	1430	−2.48	+0.94	−3.42	518(51st)
2011	5-5	1418	27.2	25.1	+2.1	1451	−1.2	−1.5	+0.3	1508	−2.38	+0.73	−3.11	516(50th)
2010	3-7	1116	24.2	30.3	−6.1	1494	−4.8	+1.8	−6.6	1335	−4.58	+0.15	−4.73	467(32nd)
2009	2-8	1121	24.3	32.2	−7.9	1549	−0.5	+5.0	−5.6	1360	−5.47	+0.29	−5.77	469(33rd)
2008	1-9	951	19.9	37.2	−17.3	1557	−7.1	+8.2	−15.3	1118	−6.74	+0.03	−6.77	422(20th)
2007	1-8	1142	14.8	31.9	−17.1	1552	−10.1	+3.0	−13.1	1173	−5.64	+0.05	−5.69	448(27th)
2006	4-6	1411	12.9	22.7	−9.8	1563	−9.2	−2.8	−6.4	1340	−2.77	+0.63	−3.40	496(42nd)
2005	6-5	1481	20.2	24.1	−3.9	1623	−1.6	−2.3	+0.7	1518	−1.58	+0.79	−2.37	526(54th)
2004	6-4	1541	28.8	22.1	+6.7	1519	+6.2	−1.0	+7.3	1682	−1.74	+1.10	−2.85	555(64th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.